Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;7(2):182–191. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.2.182-191.2000

TABLE 11.

Monocyte CD4 tagging experiments: use of goat anti-mouse Ig–FITC to localize CD4—anti-CD4–PE MAb complex of tagged monocytes

Isolation no. Monocyte CD4 expression (mean channel no.) in overnight PBMC cultures
Untagged cultures
CD4-tagged cultures
Autoa GaM-FITCb Auto GaM-FITC
19 0.357 0.367 0.372 0.367
24 0.510 0.664 0.654 0.898
25 0.505 0.561 0.763 0.717
Meanc ± SEM 0.073 ± 0.042d 0.064 ± 0.091de
a

Mean channel number of autofluorescence (FL1 log). 

b

Mean channel number of goat anti-mouse Ig (GaM)–FITC signal. 

c

Corrected for autofluorescence. 

d

No statistically significant binding of goat anti-mouse Ab to monocytes; P > 0.050. 

e

No statistically significant difference in levels of goat anti-mouse Ab between untagged and tagged cultures; P > 0.050.