Table 6.
Item-level discriminant validity testing for FHC-PA (Sg).
FHC-PA (Sg) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Label | Item Description (In our family…) | Mean | SD | Factor 1 (Val) | Factor 2 (Coh) | Factor 3 (Inf) |
Factor = Val (Value) | ||||||
Val1 | ...we make it a point of being physically active during our daily life (e.g., taking walks, exercising, playing sports) | 1.89 | 0.75 | – | 2 | 2 |
Val2 | ...it is normal to be physically active on a regular basis | 1.88 | 0.75 | – | 2 | 2 |
Val3 | ...it is normal for us that we exercise on a regular basis | 1.78 | 0.82 | – | 2 | 2 |
Val4 | ...it is normal to be physically active in our free time | 1.80 | 0.72 | – | 2 | 2 |
Val5 | ...we agree that physical activities are part of our daily life | 1.91 | 0.73 | – | 2 | 2 |
Val6 | …we encourage and support each other to be physically active | 2.01 | 0.74 | – | 1 | 2 |
Factor = Coh (Cohesion) | ||||||
Coh1 | ...we like spending time together doing physical activities | 1.71 | 0.79 | 2 | – | 2 |
Coh2 | ...we enjoy exercising together | 1.66 | 0.83 | 2 | – | 2 |
Coh3 | ...we have fun doing physical activities together | 1.78 | 0.80 | 2 | – | 2 |
Coh4 | ...we find it very pleasant to be together doing physical activities | 1.82 | 0.78 | 2 | – | 2 |
Coh5 | ...we like spending time together in sports (e.g., cycling, ball games, canoeing) | 1.51 | 0.88 | 2 | – | 2 |
Coh6 | ...we usually agree on physical activities to do together | 1.70 | 0.81 | 2 | – | 2 |
Factor = Inf (Information) | ||||||
Inf1 | ...we watch videos (e.g., on YouTube, Netflix, or TV) on fitness, physical activities, or exercise | 1.51 | 0.89 | 2 | 2 | – |
Inf2 | ...we actively look for the latest information on physical activity and exercise to stay up to date | 1.31 | 0.83 | 2 | 2 | – |
Inf3 | ...we collect information (e.g., download/bookmark online information, cut out print articles) on fitness, physical activity, and exercise | 1.24 | 0.81 | 2 | 2 | – |
Inf4 | ...we read articles (printed or online) on fitness, physical activity, and exercise | 1.41 | 0.84 | 2 | 2 | – |
Cutoff point for significance is 2 standard errors (1 SE = 0.05, 2 SE = 0.1). Levels of scaling success: 2: Item-factor correlation is significantly higher for hypothesized scale than for competing scale. 1: Item-factor correlation is higher for hypothesized scale than competing scale, but not significantly.−1: Item-factor correlation is lower for hypothesized scale than competing scale, but not significantly.−2: Item-factor correlation is significantly lower for hypothesized scale than for competing scale.