Table 2.
Factor structure of the acculturation scale compared between the subsamples.
| Factor | Hungary | Czech rep. | Serbia | Germany |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor 1 | Sep 2 | Sep 2 | Sep 2 (−) | Sep 2 |
| Ass 2 | Ass 2 | Ass 2 | Ass 2 | |
| Sep 3 | Sep 3 | Sep 3 | ||
| Ass 3 | Ass 3 | Ass 3 | ||
| Ass 4 | Ass 4 (−) | Ass 4 | ||
| Int 5 (−) | Int 5 (−) | |||
| Int 2 | Sep 1 | |||
| Int 4 | Int 3 (−) | |||
| Sep 1 (−) | ||||
| Factor 2 | Ass 5 | Ass 5 | Ass 5 | Ass 5 |
| Int 4 | Int 4 | Int 4 | ||
| Ass 1 | Ass 1 | Ass 1 | ||
| Sep 1 | Sep 1 | Int 5 | Ass 3 | |
| Ass 4 | Int 1 | |||
| Factor 3 | Int 2 | Int 2 | Int 2 | |
| Int 1 | Int 1 | Int 1 | ||
| Int 3 | Int 3 | Int 3 | ||
| Int 5 | Ass 1 |
(−) negative loading on the affiliated factor.