Table 4.
Proposed relative importance of the confidence criteria in the scheme for the assessment of structural alerts relating to acceptable levels of confidence. In this case, the attributes are for hazard identification supporting risk assessment.
| Criteria | Comment |
|---|---|
| Essential Attributes of a Structural Alert – Must be Associated with High Confidence (where possible) | |
| Structural Description | The alert must be explicitly defined in terms of its chemical structure, structural domain and which species it is relevant to. |
| Property Domain | |
| Toxicity or Relationship to Adversity | |
| Species Specificity | |
| Corroborating Evidence | |
| Desirable Attributes of a Structural Alert – Preferably Associated with High Confidence (where possible) | |
| Metabolic Domain | The mechanistic and metabolic relevance of an alert increases its transparency and potential acceptance. |
| Mechanistic Interpretation | |
| Mechanistic Causality | |
| Optional Attributes of a Structural Alerts – Where Possible Associated with High/Moderate Confidence | |
| Purpose | Statistical analysis and source data increase the credibility, or otherwise, of a structural alert. |
| Coverage | |
| Performance | |
| Supporting Evidence | |