Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 4;226(4):696–707. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiac289

Table 3.

Modelled sensitivity of diagnostic tests

Sensitivity (95% CI)
Diagnostic Test 10 p/μL 50 p/μL 100 p/μL 200 p/μL 10 p/μL 50 p/μL 100 p/μL 200 p/μL 10 p/μL 50 p/μL 100 p/μL 200 p/μL
A. Overall modelled sensitivities at low density B. Modelled sensitivity by fever status
Overall Febrile Afebrile
Microscopy 7% (4–15) 45% (34–57) 69% (54–81) 86% (72–93) 11% (2–38) 71% (48–87) 90% (67–98) 97% (79–100) 6% (2–14) 34% (22–47) 56% (38–72) 76% (55–89)
cRDT 26% (18–36) 56% (46–66) 69% (56–80) 80% (66–89) 48% (26–71) 84% (64–94) 91% (71–98) 96% (76–99) 20% (12–30) 44% (32–56) 56% (40–71) 68% (48–83)
usRDT 32% (24–43) 62% (51–71) 73% (60–83) 82% (68–91) 51% (29–73) 81% (62–92) 89% (68–97) 94% (72–99) 27% (19–39) 52% (40–64) 63% (48–77) 73% (54–87)
LAMP 55% (45–64) 74% (64–82) 80% (69–88) 86% (73–93) 58% (35–78) 87% (68–96) 93% (73–99) 96% (77–100) 53% (42–64) 68% (56–78) 73% (58–85) 78% (60–90)
C. Modelled sensitivity by gravidity
Primigravid Secundigravid Multigravid
Microscopy 10% (3–29) 47% (30–65) 69% (45–86) 85% (56–96) 7% (2–27) 49% (27–71) 74% (47–90) 90% (63–98) 7% (2–19) 39% (22–59) 62% (37–83) 81% (51–95)
cRDT 34% (17–57) 59% (42–74) 69% (47–84) 77% (50–92) 24% (11–44) 55% (36–73) 69% (45–86) 80% (52–93) 23% (13–37) 55% (36–72) 69% (45–86) 80% (53–94)
usRDT 46% (26–68) 67% (51–81) 75% (54–89) 81% (55–94) 35% (20–54) 61% (42–77) 72% (48–87) 80% (53–94) 25% (14–39) 56% (38–73) 70% (46–86) 81% (53–94)
LAMP 56% (33–76) 77% (60–88) 83% (62–94) 88% (63–97) 67% (48–81) 81% (62–92) 86% (63–95) 89% (63–98) 47% (33–60) 65% (48–80) 72% (50–87) 79% (51–93)
D. Modelled sensitivity by trimester of pregnancy
First Second Third
Microscopy 7% (2–27) 39% (18–64) 61% (30–85) 80% (40–96) 5% (2–14) 48% (32–64) 76% (56–88) 91% (75–97) 20% (6–51) 45% (23–68) 57% (27–82) 69% (29–92)
cRDT 15% (5–37) 48% (26–70) 65% (35–87) 79% (42–95) 24% (14–36) 62% (48–75) 77% (60–88) 87% (71–95) 51% (27–75) 49% (28–71) 48% (22–76) 47% (16–81)
usRDT 28% (13–51) 56% (34–76) 68% (39–88) 78% (42–95) 29% (19–43) 69% (54–80) 82% (66–91) 90% (75–97) 51% (27–75) 49% (28–71) 48% (22–76) 47% (16–81)
LAMP 61% (39–79) 86% (59–96) 91% (60–99) 95% (60–100) 53% (41–65) 76% (63–85) 83% (68–92) 88% (72–96) 52% (27–76) 56% (33–77) 58% (29–82) 60% (23–88)

Diagnostic test sensitivity at low density derived from logistic models incorporating PET-PCR samples with parasite densities below 500 parasites/μL. (A) Overall modelled sensitivity of diagnostic tests at low density, (B) modelled sensitivity by fever status, (C) by gravidity, and (D) by trimester of pregnancy. Abbreviations: 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; p/μL, parasites per microliter; cRDT, conventional RDT; usRDT, ultra-sensitive RDT; LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.