Table 8.
Proposed model performance comparsion with other state-of-the-art work.
| Article | Classification | Dataset | Accuracy | Precession | Recall | F1 score | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Agarwal et al., 2020) | Multi-Class (10) | Plant village | 90.98% | 89% | 91.97% | 90.96% | Non segmented |
| (G Irmak and Saygili, 2020) | Multi-Class (10) | Plant village | 93.55% | 93.93% | 95.69 | 93.91% | Segmented |
| (Zhang et al., 2018) | Multi-Class (10) | Custom | 94.12% | 94.72% | 94.35% | 96.64% | Non segmented |
| (Dookie et al., 2021) | Binary | Custom | 86.10% | 86.44% | 86.37 | 86.41% | Non segmented |
| Proposed study | Binary | Plant village | 99.97% | 99.11% | 99.96% | 99.93% | Segmented |
| Multi-Class (6) | Plant village | 99.22% | 99.19% | 99.20% | 99.17% | Segmented | |
| Multi-Class (10) | Plant village | 99.91% | 99.31% | 99.29% | 99.30% | Segmented |