Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;13:998499. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.998499

Table 2.

Comparison of clinical outcomes with or without stress hyperglycaemia on admission.

Parameters No stress hyperglycaemia(n=1293) Stress hyperglycaemia(n=499) P Estimate, OR or HR (95% CI) Adjusted P
Persistent organ failure, n (%) 203 (15.7) 170 (34.1) <0.001 2.00 (1.51-2.65) a <0.001
MODS, n (%) 40 (3.1) 41 (8.2) <0.001 1.18 (0.68-2.06) a 0.558
Acute necrotic collection, n (%) 245 (18.9) 174 (34.9) <0.001 1.78 (1.39-2.29) a <0.001
Major infection, n (%) 69 (5.3) 72 (14.4) <0.001 2.22 (1.52-3.24) a <0.001
Mortality, n (%) 17 (1.3) 26 (5.2) <0.001 2.11 (1.04-4.29) a 0.039
LOHS, days, median (25th-75th percentile) 8 (6-13) 11 (7-17) <0.001 0.77 (0.68-0.85) b <0.001
a

Logistic regression with OR after adjusting baseline variates.

b

Cox proportional hazards model with HR (deceased patients removed) after adjusting baseline variates. These variates included age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, time to admission, referral status, biliary aetiology, admission triglyceride levels and APACHE II that each with considerable clinical importance.

OR, odds ratio; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MODS, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome; LOHS, length of hospital stays.

Bold values indicates that the P value is statistically significant.