Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;25(Suppl 6):e26009. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26009
Abstract P212 – Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters and statistical analysis summary of dabigatran alone (day 1) and after single (day 4) and multiple (day 18) doses of darunavir coadministered with cobicistat or ritonavir. Panel 1: treatment A, dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 1; treatment B, darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 4; treatment C, darunavir/cobicistat 800/150 mg (once daily) on days 5 to 20 and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 18. Panel 2: treatment D, dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 1; treatment E, darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 4; treatment F, darunavir/ritonavir 800/100 mg (once daily) on days 5 to 20 and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg on day 18.
Panel 1
Parameter Treatment A (dabigatran etexilate) Treatment B (dabigatran etexilate + single‐dose darunavir/cobicistat) Treatment C (dabigatran etexilate + multiple doses darunavir/cobicistat)
n 14 14 14
Cmax, mean (SD), ng/mL 130 (41.6) 344 (96.8) 254 (62.5)
tmax, median (range), h 3.00 (1.50 to 5.00) 4.00 (3.00 to 5.00) 4.00 (3.00 to 5.02)
AUCinf, mean (SD), ng.h/mL 1207 (325) 3233 (1054) 2252 (520)
t1/2, mean (SD), h 9.3 (1.8) 10.7 (2.7) 10.7 (3.0)
Comparison Geometric LSM ratio 90% CI
Cmax, ng/mL Treatment B vs A 2.64 (2.29 to 3.05)
Treatment C vs A 1.99 (1.72 to 2.30)
AUCinf, ng.h/mL Treatment B vs A 2.64 (2.32 to 3.00)
Treatment C vs A 1.88 (1.65 to 2.13)
Panel 2
Parameter Treatment D (dabigatran etexilate) Treatment E (dabigatran etexilate + single‐dose darunavir/ritonavir Treatment F (dabigatran etexilate + multiple doses darunavir/ritonavir)
n 14 14 13
Cmax, mean (SD), ng/mL 186 (65.4) 301 (95.2) 266 (116)
tmax, median (range), h 3.00 (1.00 to 5.00) 4.01 (2.02 to 5.02) 4.02 (1.52 to 5.00)
AUCinf, mean (SD), ng.h/mL 1565 (509) 2667 (847) 2068 (877)
t1/2, mean (SD), h 8.8 (1.1) 9.8 (2.1) 8.9 (1.8)
Comparison Geometric LSM ratio 90% CI
Cmax, ng/mL Treatment E vs D 1.64 (1.21 to 2.23)
Treatment F vs D 1.22 (0.89 to 1.67)
AUCinf, ng.h/mL Treatment E vs D 1.72 (1.33 to 2.23)
Treatment F vs D 1.18 (0.90 to 1.53)

LSM, least squares mean; SD, standard deviation; t1/2, half‐life; tmax, time at Cmax.