| Abstract P069 – Table 1. SSP perception of acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibilitya. | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month 1 mean (SD) | Month 5 mean (SD) | Month 12 mean (SD) | |||||||
| Total | Arm‐E | Arm‐S | Total | Arm‐E | Arm‐S | Total | Arm‐E | Arm‐S | |
| Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM‐Imp) | 3.8 (0.76) | 3.8 (0.76) | 3.9 (0.75) | 4.0 (0.72) | 4.0 (0.79) | 4.1 (0.65) | 4.2 (0.71) | 4.0 (0.77) | 4.3 (0.63) |
| Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM‐Imp) | 3.8 (0.77) | 3.8 (0.78) | 3.9 (0.78) | 4.0 (0.74) | 3.9 (0.89) | 4.2 (0.53) | 4.1 (0.70) | 3.9 (0.76) | 4.2 (0.63) |
| Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM‐Imp) | 4.0 (0.64) | 4.0 (0.66) | 4.0 (0.64) | 4.1 (0.72) | 4.1 (0.82) | 4.2 (0.61) | 4.1 (0.73) | 4.0 (0.81) | 4.3 (0.61) |
| Acceptability of Intervention (CAB+RPV LA) Measure (AIM‐Int) | 4.6 (0.50) | 4.6 (0.43) | 4.6 (0.56) | 4.5 (0.50) | 4.5 (0.50) | 4.5 (0.51) | 4.5 (0.60) | 4.5 (0.66) | 4.5 (0.55) |
| Intervention (CAB+RPV LA) Appropriateness Measure (IAM‐Int) | 4.2 (0.54) | 4.3 (0.53) | 4.2 (0.57) | 4.3 (0.57) | 4.3 (0.43) | 4.3 (0.68) | 4.3 (0.54) | 4.2 (0.47) | 4.3 (0.60) |
| Feasibility of Intervention (CAB+RPV LA) Measure (FIM‐Int) | 4.2 (0.56) | 4.2 (0.55) | 4.3 (0.58) | 4.5 (0.49) | 4.6 (0.47) | 4.5 (0.51) | 4.4 (0.60) | 4.4 (0.66) | 4.4 (0.54) |
Arm‐E, Enhanced Arm; Arm‐S, Standard Arm; CAB, cabotegravir; LA, long‐acting; RPV, rilpivirine; SD, standard deviation; SSP, staff study participant.
aAcceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility measures are rated on a 1 to 5 Likert scale: 1 'completely disagree'; 2 'disagree'; 3 'neither agree nor disagree'; 4 'agree'; 5 'completely agree'.