Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;25(Suppl 6):e26009. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26009
Abstract P146 – Table 1. CVD risk prediction strata according to different CVD risk prediction modelsa.
n = 1132
ASCVD Low risk (<5%) n (%) Borderline risk (5% to 7.5%) n (%) Intermediate risk (7.5% to 20%) n (%) High risk (≥20%) n (%)
459 (40.5) 189 (16.7) 378 (33.4) 106 (9.4)
FRS‐CVD 10 year Low risk (<10%) n (%) Moderate risk (10% to 20%) n (%) High risk (≥20%) n (%)
464 (41) 372 (32.9) 296 (26.1)
Modified Framingham 728 (64.3) 304 (26.9) 100 (8.8)
<1% n (%) 1% to 5% n (%) 5% to 10% n (%) >10% n (%)
D:A:D‐reduced 5 year 62 (5.5) 651 (57.5) 276 (24.4) 143 (12.6)
D:A:D‐reduced 10 year 8 (0.7) 319 (28.2) 375 (33.1) 430 (38)
SCORE2/SCORE2‐OP for high risk countries Low‐moderate n (%) High risk n (%) Very high risk n (%)
320 (28.3) 615 (54.3) 197 (17.4)

ASCVD, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; FRS‐CVD, Framingham Heart Study General CVD; D:A:D, Data Collection on Adverse Events of Anti‐HIV Drugs; SCORE2, Systemic Coronary Risk Evaluation Score 2; SCORE2‐OP, SCORE2‐Older Persons.

aPatients were considered at higher risk if their 10‐year CVD risk was >20% for FRS‐CVD and Mod‐FRS, >20% for ASCVD, 5‐year risk >10% for D:A:D and high/very high risk for SCORE2 for high‐risk countries.