Table 2.

Zero-order Correlations among Study Variables

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1. ERD	1
2. EXP	−0.01	1
3. COM	−0.06**	0.74**	1
4. CEN/PRI	−0.04*	0.58**	0.73**	1
5. POS	−0.05**	0.14**	0.19**	0.19**	1
6. ANX	0.22**	0.02	−0.06**	−0.06**	−0.06**	1
7. ANG	0.25**	0.03	−0.07**	−0.09**	−0.16**	0.70**	1
8. NEG	0.25**	0.03	−0.06**	−0.08**	−0.15**	0.74**	0.80**	1
9. SOM	0.24**	0.01	−0.04*	−0.03	−0.16**	0.47**	0.48**	0.47**	1
10. RUM	0.27**	0.02	−0.04*	−0.03	−0.10**	0.52**	0.53**	0.63**	0.47**	1
11. COP	0.21**	0.11**	0.04*	0.06**	0.08**	0.35**	0.33**	0.36**	0.25**	0.59**	1
Mean	0.09	2.67	3.06	5.00	3.10	1.75	1.64	1.55	1.43	1.32	1.39
SD	0.28	0.63	0.60	1.17	1.10	0.89	0.89	0.89	0.56	0.53	0.56
Internal Consistency	n/a	0.77	0.92	0.89	0.89	0.83	0.85	0.90	0.81	0.91	0.87

Note.

^*p < .05,

^**p < .01.

ERD = discrimination; EXP = ERI exploration; COM = ERI commitment; CEN/PRI = ERI centrality/private regard; POS = positive mood; ANX = anxious mood; ANG = angry mood; NEG = negative mood; SOM = somatic symptoms; RUM = rumination; COP = problem solving coping strategies. ERI exploration, commitment, and centrality/private regard were measured at individual level, and all other variables were measured at daily level. For ERI exploration, commitment, and centrality/private regard, McDonald’s ω was used as the measure of internal consistency. For all other measures, Cronbach’s α was used as the measure of internal consistency.