Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;7(2):258–264. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.2.258-264.2000

TABLE 2.

Differentiation capability of rep-PCR fingerprints from 12 isolates of S. enterica in relation to cycling regimen and use of single versus multiple cyclers

Fingerprints from cyclers A and B analyzed separately or combined Cycling regimen Differentiation index (%)a
ERIC2 fingerprints BOXA1R fingerprints Composite fingerprints
Separate Standard 79.1bc 87.2fg 78.5jk
70-TD 74.0bd 78.7fh 64.8jl
Combined Standard 79.9ce 85.9gi 78.0km
70-TD 74.3de 78.2hi 68.1lm
a

Smaller values indicate better differentiation. 

b

P > 0.10. 

c

P > 0.10. 

d

P > 0.10. 

e

P > 0.10. 

f

P < 0.002. 

g

P > 0.10. 

h

P > 0.10. 

i

P = 0.003. 

j

P = 0.03. 

k

P > 0.10. 

l

P > 0.10. 

m

P = 0.02.