Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;7(2):258–264. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.2.258-264.2000

TABLE 3.

Net discrimination power of rep-PCR fingerprints from 12 isolates of S. enterica in relation to cycling regimen and use of single versus multiple cyclers

Fingerprints from cyclers A and B analyzed separately or combined Cycling regimen Net discrimination power (%)a
ERIC2 fingerprints BOXA1R fingerprints Composite fingerprints
Separate Standard 14.3bc 8.0fg 11.8jk
70-TD 21.5bd 16.0fh 23.4jl
Combined Standard 7.2ce 8.3gi 6.0km
70-TD 19.3de 15.6hi 22.7lm
a

Larger values for net discrimination power (similarity index − differentiation index) indicate better discrimination. 

b

P > 0.10. 

c

P = 0.01. 

d

P = 0.05. 

e

P = 0.03. 

f

P > 0.10. 

g

P > 0.10. 

h

P > 0.10. 

i

P = 0.04. 

j

P = 0.01. 

k

P = 0.003. 

l

P > 0.10. 

m

P < 0.001.