Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 20;22:1271. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08563-5

Table 2.

Important factors in the implementation of value-based quality improvement in hospital care

Domain Main factor Sub factors Experience§
Organization of VBQI 1. Practical organization of value-based quality improvement teams a. Available time of health professionals -
b. Planning and attendance of meetings -
c. Availability of VBHC support staff (data analysts/project leaders) +
2. Organizational structure a. Organization of care around the patient +/-
b. Volume versus value for patients -
c. Shared workspace +/-
d. Health professionals dedicated to medical condition +
e. Financial benefits of adopting VBHC concept +
f. Formal responsibility for quality of care +/-
g. Mandate of value-based quality improvement team +/-
3. Integration of VBHC with existing QI approaches and research a. Shared Decision Making +
b. Lean-philosophy +
c. Use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) +
d. Scientific Research +
e. one central group for quality improvement +/-
Culture of VBQI 4. Adoption and knowledge of the VBHC concept in the hospital a. Knowledge of VBHC concept +/-
b. Belief in added value VBHC +/-
c. Reputation of VBHC concept +/-
d. Impact of seeing VBHC results +/-
5. Multidisciplinary engagement a. Engagement of multiple disciplines in improvement team +/-
b. Small efficient teams +
c. Equal input from team members +
d. Outcome data that is relevant and adjustable for all team members -
e. Patient involvement -
f. Engagement of health professionals outside improvement team -
g. Readiness to change -
h. Engagement of colleagues from other participating hospitals +/-
6. Medical leadership a. Inspirational medical leadership +
b. Medical leader’s ability to engage others +
c. Involvement/accessibility of medical leader +/-
Practice of VBQI 7. Goal setting and selecting quality improvement initiatives a. Purpose of value-based quality improvement team meetings -
b. Setting clear goals for outcome improvement -
c. Selection of improvement initiative; need for clear methodology -
d. Improving without clear improvement potential -
e. Improving quality of care without outcome data -
f. Evaluation of improvement initiatives -
8. Long-cycle benchmarking and short-cycle feedback a. Long-cycle benchmarking between networking hospitals +/-
b. Short-cycle continuous improvement through electronic care pathways +
9. Availability of outcome data a. Data collection and data analysis -
b. Access to data not directly related to an intervention -
c. (national) Data registry +
d. Support of information technology (IT) +

§Factors were experienced by participants as hindering (-), as supporting (+), or both (+/-), depending on the poor/proper implementation of the factor