Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;22:809. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03498-2

Table 2.

Difference of pre-test and post-test WOMAC, muscle strength, and functional fitness within group.

Functional fitness parameter CRE group (N = 20) CON group (N = 18)
Mean difference (95% CI) p Cohen’ d Mean difference (95% CI) p Cohen’ d
WOMAC a 2.416*10–04 0.71 0.279 0.07
Muscle strength (kg)
 Hip abductors b -1.49(-2.25, -0.74) 0.001 0.13 0.99(0.19–1.79) 0.019 0.13
 Hip adductors b -3.31(-4.76, -1.87) 1.252*10–04 0.10 -0.13(-1.04–0.77) 0.759 0.10
 Hip flexors b -3.40(-4.79, -2.00) 6.323*10–04 0.18 1.13(-0.27–2.54) 0.107 0.18
 Hip extensors b -0.30(-3.60, -1.00) 0.002 0.04 0.59(-0.34–1.51) 0.198 0.04
 Knee flexors b -0.63(-1.89, 0.63) 0.307 -0.16 0.95(-0.08–1.97) 0.070 -0.16
 Knee extensors b -1.01(-1.99, -0.04) 0.043 -0.17 0.46(-0.48–1.39) 0.317 -0.17
Functional Fitness
 30-s chair stand (no. of times) b -0.45(-2.51, 1.61) 0.653 -0.19 -0.11(-1.28–1.06) 0.843 -0.19
 Functional-reach test (cm) b -3.66(-6.01, -1.31) 0.004 -0.04 0.21(-2.06–2.48) 0.847 -0.04
 10-m walk test (s) a 0.002 0.49 0.005 0.46

CRE Computer-aided rowing exercise, CON Control group, CI Confidence interval, bold p value represents reaching the significance level (p < .05)

a Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed

b paired sample t-tests were performed