Table 3.
Studies of Balance in PwCOPD Using Non-Biomechanical Tests
| Study | Subjects | Conditions | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beauchamp, et al24 | 23 PwCOPD fallers 16 PwCOPD non-fallers |
BBS ABC scale TUG |
Poorer performance on the BBS, less confidence as reported on the ABC, and longer time to complete TUG in fallers compared to non-fallers |
| Chauvin, et al176 | 34 PwCOPD fallers 38 PwCOPD non-fallers |
BESTest | Balance subcomponent that could identify fallers from non-fallers was stability limits/verticality |
| Jácome, et al40 | 49 mild PwCOPD 63 moderate PwCOPD 48 severe PwCOPD |
TUG | Those with severe to very severe disease took significantly longer to complete the TUG compared to moderate and mild disease Compared to reference values, those aged 70+ took longer to complete the TUG |
| Janssens, et al56 | 18 PwCOPD 18 controls |
EC Sit-to-Stand-to-Sit | Required 46% more time to complete five sit-to-stand-to-sit due to longer stand and stand-to-sit phases |
| Voica, et al35 | 13 Emphysematous PwCOPD 14 Bronchitic COPD 17 controls |
ABC BBS TUG SLS |
All COPD had worse balance compared to controls Bronchitic PwCOPD had less confidence (lower ABC), shorter single leg stance times, took longer to complete the TUG compared to emphysemateous PwCOPD |
| Tudorache, et al9 | 22 stable PwCOPD 19 PwCOPD & exacerbation 20 controls |
FES BBS TUG SLS |
All COPD had worse balance compared to controls Balance was worse for those experiencing exacerbation compared to those with stable COPD for all measures |
Abbreviations: BBS, Berg Balance Scale; ABC, Activity-specific balance confidence scale; TUG, Timed Up and Go; SLS, Single limb stance time; FES, Falls efficacy scale.