NCT01276223.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
00. Study design: randomized controlled trial, parallel group 01. Calendar time when the study enrolled the first participant (YYYY/MM): 2011/02 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 02. Calendar time when the study completed follow‐up (YYYY/MM): 2012/01 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 03. Unit of randomization (participant or eye): participant 04. Masking of participants, treatment allocator, outcome assessor, or data analyzer: double (participant, investigator) 05. Study visits and the corresponding time points: baseline, week 1, 2, 3, 4 06. Instruments and the scales used for documenting patient‐reported symptoms or quality of life: VAS was used by the participant to assess ocular discomfort, both frequency and severity, at baseline (pre‐treatment) and weekly thereafter for 4 additional weeks. Each scale was 100 mm in length. The VAS score was calculated by measuring the length in millimeters from the start of the line to the intersection point of the vertical mark made by the participant. The Global Ocular Discomfort Score is a composite of the 2 VAS scores, ranging from 0 (very mildly) to 100 (very severely uncomfortable). 07. Assessment for safety outcomes: NR 08. Planned follow‐up duration: 4 weeks 09. Actual follow‐up duration: 4 weeks 10. Planned treatment duration (of the intervention steroid): 4 weeks 11. How missing data were handled: of the 722 participants enrolled, 433 did not qualify for run‐in and were exited without exposure to product. Of the 289 participants entering run‐in, 78 did not qualify for treatment. The 211 participants qualifying for treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive either difluprednate (Durezol) or vehicle. Mixed model repeated measure (MMRM) approach was used to handle missing data during the randomized treatment period; 4 and 3 participants in the difluprednate and vehicle groups did not complete the study. 12. Description on power and sample size calculation: NR |
|
Participants |
Country: USA Setting: participants were recruited from 25 investigative sites Interventions:
Age, mean/SD (range): 54.4/14.8 Female, n (%): 90 (84.1%) Etiology, n (%): NR Participants (eyes) randomized: 107 Participants (eyes) analyzed for primary study outcomes: 107 Participants (eyes) analyzed for safety outcomes: 107
Age, mean/SD (range): 60.1/13.8 Female, n (%): 85 (81.7%) Etiology, n (%): NR Participants (eyes) randomized: 104 Participants (eyes) analyzed for primary study outcomes: 104 Participants (eyes) analyzed for safety outcomes: 104
Age, mean/SD (range): 57.2/14.6 Female, n (%): 175 (82.9%) Etiology, n (%): NR Participants (eyes) randomized: 211 Participants (eyes) analyzed for primary study outcomes: 211 Participants (eyes) analyzed for safety outcomes: 211 Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Baseline comparison: participants in the difluprednate group were 5.7 years younger than those in the vehicle group (post hoc P = 0.004) |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
Time points of primary outcome data collected: at week 4 Primary outcomes of the study: mean change from baseline (Week 0) in VAS Global Ocular Discomfort Score over 4 weeks Other outcomes of the study: NR |
|
Study Identification |
Sponsorship source: Alcon Research Ethics approval: NR Correspondence author's name: NR Additional information:
|
|
Notes |