Figure 4.
FA Asymmetry of CSTs is reduced after Real NF training. (A) The Real group (n = 10) had lower FA asymmetry in the CSTs (inset) after NF training compared to the Sham group (n = 11). Change in FA asymmetry between baseline and 1-week follow-up is plotted for the Real and the Sham group. The black line represents median change, coloured boxes represent 95% confidence intervals and individual participant data points are shown with open circles. (B) The same information is shown for FA change between baseline and 1-week follow-up in the affected (top) and unaffected (bottom) CSTs. (See also Supplementary Table 8.) (C) Neurofeedback success was positively correlated with FA change in the stroke-affected hemisphere in the Real group, whereas no correlation was found in the Sham group with the two correlations being significantly different from each other (P = 0.004). *P < 0.05.
