Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;12:17659. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22531-3

Table 4.

Correlations of calculated biomarkers to somatometric data and response to oral glucose tolerance testing (NHANES cohort) or M-value (clamp cohort), respectively.

HOMA-Beta HOMA-IR QUICKI SPINA-GBeta SPINA-GR
NHANES cohort
BMI 0.416††† 0.516††† − 0.516††† 0.500††† − 0.513†††
Waist circumference 0.339††† 0.498††† − 0.498††† 0.456††† − 0.502†††∆◊
Triceps skinfold 0.371††† 0.331††† − 0.331††† 0.363††† − 0.320†††∆◊
Subscapular skinfold 0.320††† 0.383††† − 0.383††† 0.375††† − 0.381†††
2 h glucose in oGTT 0.050* 0.347††† − 0.347††† 0.235††† − 0.368†††∆◊
Glucose rise in oGTT 0.091 0.245††† − 0.245††† 0.187††† − 0.256†††∆◊
HbA1c − 0.063*** 0.219††† − 0.219††† 0.104†† − 0.243†††∆◊
Clamp cohort
BMI 0.193 0.056 − 0.054 0.089∆ − 0.049
Waist circumference 0.374*** 0.274** − 0.275** 0.295** − 0.273**
WHR 0.276** 0.245* − 0.242* 0.248* − 0.250*
Truncal fat 0.379*** 0.412*** − 0.412 0.408 − 0.411
Fat (DXA) 0.409 0.427 − 0.428 0.429 − 0.429
FFM 0.238* 0.078 − 0.077 0.113∆ − 0.071
M value − 0.361*** − 0.311** 0.314** − 0.334*** 0.305**

Shown are rho values of Spearman’s rank correlation. p * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001,  < 1e–4, †† < 1e–6, ††† < 1e–15 for correlations. ∆ Different from correlation for corresponding HOMA parameter; ◊ different from correlation for QUICKI, based on Zou’s confidence intervals.