Table 2.
Review of studies using ERT to estimate the volume of mining wastes for valorization
References | Country / State | TSF / WRP | ERT setup | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|
Florsch et al. (2012) |
France Occitanie |
WRP Slag heap |
pseudo-3D ERT 25m x 18m |
3D imaging of a slag heap for estimation of archaeological metal production (130 tons) |
Günther and Martin (2016) |
Germany Lower-Saxony |
WRP Slag heap |
2D ERT line 42m |
Use of ERT and SIP to map mineralized areas for reuse |
Saladich et al. (2016) |
Spain Catalonia |
TSF |
2D ERT lines (x10) 50m to 100m |
Threshold in to discriminate bedrock, cover and tailings |
Markovaara-Koivisto et al. (2018) |
Finland Western Finland |
TSF |
pseudo-3D ERT 200m x 300m |
Threshold in to identify high-grade copper wastes LIDAR data for volume |
Nikonow et al. (2019) |
Chile Santiago |
TSF |
2D ERT lines (x13) 120m to 1300m |
3D distribution of fine/coarse grained tailings Correlation with copper |
Martin et al. (2020) |
Germany Lower-Saxony |
WRP |
2D ERT lines (x27) 25m to 99m |
Sampling data to estimate threshold in for wastes with economic potential |
Martínez-Segura et al. (2020) |
Spain Murcia |
TSF |
2D ERT lines (x16) 85m to 215m |
Thresholds in to estimate depth of wastes and volume estimation with LIDAR data |