Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;20:74. doi: 10.1186/s12960-022-00771-8

Table 2.

Geospatial analysis of influential variables that can affect severe acute malnutrition treatment coverage at the three largest districts of Kayes Region in Mali

aKita District % (95% CI) High supervision bKayes District % (95% CI) Light supervision cBafoulabé District % (95% CI) Not supportive supervision Comparison*
(p value)
Overlap between areas covered by HFs and CHWs 48.7 (39.2–58.2) 55.8 (45.3–65.9) 30.9 (19.2–44.3)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

Children 0–59 months without geographical access to a health provider 70.4 (70.1–70.6) 52.6 (52.3–52.8) 80.4 (79.9–80.8)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

Children 0–59 months not covered by active screening 52.2 (51.9–52.5) 9.8 (9.6–10.0) 68.6 (68.0–69.1)

a–b: < 0.001

a–c: < 0.001

b–c: < 0.001

The letters a, b and c refer to each of the districts to summarize which districts are being compared in the final comparison column

CHWs: community health workers; HFs: health facilities