Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 22;10:148. doi: 10.1186/s40478-022-01458-w

Table 1.

Demographics

n (%) Age, years mean (SD)a Sex, female, n (%) MMSE, mean (SD) Post-mortem delay mean (SD) in hours
Plasma
FTD 56 (22%) 59.4 (7.4) 25 (45%) 24 (5.2)
FTLD-TDPd 40 (71%) 59.8 (7.9) 18 (45%) 24 (5.7)
FTLD-Taue 16 (29%) 58.2 (6.2) 7 (44%) 25 (3.6)
AD 57 (22%) 65.5 (8.0)c 22 (39%) 23 (2.3)
Controls 148 (57%) 61.3 (7.9) 60 (41%) 29 (1.4) b
Post-mortem frontal cortex
FTD 10 (67%) 60.1 (8.0) 6 (60%) NA 6.5 (3.7)
FTLD-TDP 5 (50%) 64.0 (7.7) 3 (60%) NA 6.8 (3.1)
FTLD-Tau 5 (50%) 56.2 (6.9) 3 (60%) NA 5.3 (0.6)
Controls 4 (33%) 61.3 (8.1) 3 (75%) NA 8.8 (2.5)

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test were used as appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered significant

AD Alzheimer’s disease, TDP TAR DNA binding protein 43, FTD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, MMSE mini mental state examination, NA not available

aAge at inclusion in plasma samples and age at death in post-mortem tissue

bFTD patients and AD had significantly lower MMSE scores

cFTD patients and controls were significantly younger than AD patients

dFTLD-TDP pathology was present in 40 subjects (18 autopsy confirmed cases, 13 GRN [of whom 1 was autopsy confirmed], 9 C9orf72 [of whom 1 was autopsy confirmed]), and FTLD-Tau pathology in 16 subjects (3 autopsy-confirmed cases, 13 MAPT [of whom 2 were also autopsy confirmed])

eFTLD-TDP was present in 5 subjects (4 cases were familial [GRN n = 2 and C9orf72 n = 2] and 1 was a sporadic case), and FTLD-Tau was present in 5 cases (all 5 cases were familial [MAPT n = 5])