Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 22;23:894. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06835-3

Table 3.

Primary and secondary analysis overview

Objective Outcome Hypothesis Method of Analysis
Name Type
To determine if CBT reduces the prevalence of moderate to severe persistent post-surgical pain over 12 months post-fracture Persistent post-surgical pain as defined by the WHO, and of ≥ 4/10 severity Binary The prevalence of persistent post-surgical pain over 12 months post-fracture will be lower in the CBT treatment group compared to the usual care group Logistic regression
Secondary Objective 1
 To determine if CBT improves physical and mental functioning over 12 months post-fracture SF-36 PCS Continuous Participants receiving CBT will have higher SF-36 PCS scores over 12 months compared to participants who do not receive CBT GEE
SF-36 MCS Continuous Participants receiving CBT will have higher SF-36 MCS scores over 12 months compared to participants who do not receive CBT GEE
Secondary Objective 2
 To determine if CBT improves return to function over 12 months post-fracture Return to ≥ 80% of pre-injury functioning Binary The proportion of participants who report ≥ 80% of pre-injury functioning will be greater in the CBT group than the usual care group over 12 months post-fracture Logistic regression
Return to full function with respect to work, leisure activities, and responsibilities around the home Binary The proportion of participants who have returned, without limitations, to: (1) work, (2) leisure activities, and (3) responsibilities around the home will be higher among participants in the CBT group than participants in the usual care group Logistic regression
Secondary Objective 3
 To determine if CBT reduces pain over 12 months post-fracture BPI-SF Average Pain Severity Score Continuous Participants receiving CBT will have lower pain severity scores over 12 months compared to participants who do not receive CBT GEE
BPI-SF Pain Interference Score Continuous Participants receiving CBT will have lower pain interference scores over 12 months compared to participants who do not receive CBT GEE
Secondary Objective 4
 To determine if CBT reduces the proportion of participants prescribed opioid class medications at 6 and 12 months Taking an opioid class medication Binary The proportion of participants prescribed opioids at 6 and 12 months will be lower in participants receiving the CBT compared to participants who do not receive CBT Logistic regression
Amount of opioid class medication consumed Continuous Participants receiving CBT will be prescribed less opioids (morphine equivalent dose per day) compared to participants who do not receive CBT GEE