Table 2.
Univariate correlations between patient/tumor variables and surgical difficulty
| Variables | Correlation coefficient | P value* |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.09 | 0.453 |
| Sex | 0.08 | 0.430 |
| Operating time | 0.46 | 0.00002 |
| Front of head | 0.1 | 0.334 |
| Back of head | 0.18 | 0.099 |
| Back of neck | 0.42 | 0.00004 |
| Front of trunk | −0.08 | 0.530 |
| Back of trunk | −0.32 | 0.005 |
| Upper limb | −0.1 | 0.296 |
| Lower limb | 0.12 | 0.699 |
| Volume of the tumor | 0.03 | 0.817 |
| Subfascial location | ||
| Intermuscular | −0.14 | 0.190 |
| Intramuscular | 0.29 | 0.006 |
| Unenhanced CT | −0.06 | 0.529 |
| Enhanced CT | −0.09 | 0.456 |
| Unenhanced MRI | 0.0006 | 0.996 |
| Enhanced MRI | 0.15 | 0.141 |
| Broadly touching | 0.37 | 0.0003 |
| Minimally touching | −0.37 | 0.001 |
| Multilocularity | 0.14 | 0.143 |
| Shaggy appearance | 0.36 | 0.0006 |
| In-flowing blood vessels | 0.38 | 0.0002 |
| Crossing the midline of the trunk | 0.29 | 0.006 |
| Unclear boundaries | 0.37 | 0.0004 |
| Normal fat tissue intervenes | −0.22 | 0.058 |
| Infiltration pattern present | 0.2 | 0.06 |
| General anesthesia | 0.12 | 0.237 |
P values less than 0.05 are shown in bold
CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging
*Pearson correlation analysis