Table 3.

Relationship between TG/HDL-C ratio and Pre-DM in different models

Variable	Crude model (OR,95%CI, P)	Model I (OR,95%CI, P)	Model II (OR,95%CI, P)	Model III (OR,95%CI, P)
TG/HDL-C	1.792 (1.744, 1.842) < 0.001	1.247 (1.208, 1.288) < 0.001	1.185 (1.145, 1.226) < 0.001	1.247 (1.208, 1.288) < 0.001
TG/HDL-C(Quintile)
Q1	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
Q2	1.321 (1.239, 1.409) < 0.001	1.118 (1.045, 1.196) < 0.001	1.101 (1.028, 1.178) < 0.001	1.118 (1.045, 1.196) < 0.001
Q3	1.617 (1.520, 1.720) < 0.001	1.165 (1.091, 1.244) < 0.001	1.129 (1.055, 1.208) < 0.001	1.165 (1.091, 1.244) < 0.001
Q4	2.062 (1.942, 2.189) < 0.001	1.272 (1.193, 1.357) < 0.001	1.205 (1.126, 1.288) < 0.001	1.272 (1.193, 1.357) < 0.001
Q5	2.938 (2.774, 3.110) < 0.001	1.497 (1.404, 1.595) < 0.001	1.377 (1.288, 1.473) < 0.001	1.497 (1.404, 1.595) < 0.001
P for trend	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001

Crude model: we did not adjust other covariants

Model I: we adjusted age, sex, BMI

Model II: we adjusted age, sex, BMI, ALT, AST, GGT, ALB, GLB, DBIL, BUN, Scr, UA, TC, LDL-C, TB

Model III: we adjusted age(smooth), sex, BMI(smooth), ALT(smooth), AST(smooth), ALB(smooth), GLB(smooth), DBIL(smooth), BUN(smooth), Scr(smooth), UA(smooth),TC(smooth), LDL-C(smooth), TB(smooth)

OR odds ratios, CI confidence, Ref reference, TG/HDL-C triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio