Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2022 Aug 22;49(10):6666–6683. doi: 10.1002/mp.15913

Table. 2.

Comparison between VPMC and MCsquare in the 13 selected patients. 3D-3D Gamma analysis was done with 2%/2mm/10%.

Patient # 3D-3D Gamma referenced to MC2 (%) Time (s) Statistical Uncertainty (%) Efficiency (10e4*1/s)

ECL VPMC MC2 VPMC MC2 VPMC MC2 VPMC

1 75.80 98.97 9.84 0.91 0.34 0.40 0.88 6.86
2 72.40 99.19 8.63 0.82 0.31 0.34 1.23 10.84
3 96.43 98.93 70.22 1.23 0.20 0.68 0.36 1.74
4 94.05 97.35 92.25 2.46 0.38 0.91 0.08 0.49
5 91.23 99.58 100.19 1.65 0.22 0.45 0.20 3.05
6 90.00 99.63 23.71 1.25 0.24 0.46 0.72 3.82
7 96.27 99.84 171.01 3.28 0.19 0.35 0.17 2.55
8 95.22 98.12 19.13 0.84 0.38 0.76 0.37 2.06
9 91.19 97.62 188.12 6.02 0.26 0.72 0.08 0.32
10 93.73 99.25 133.01 3.98 0.34 0.59 0.07 0.73
11 92.99 99.44 23.13 1.17 0.11 0.15 3.88 36.91
12 90.19 96.74 410.89 7.89 0.33 0.84 0.02 0.18
13 85.25 96.64 213.10 5.46 0.29 0.80 0.06 0.29

Mean 89.60 98.56 112.56 2.84 0.27 0.57 0.62 5.37
SD 7.24 1.09 114.38 2.33 0.08 0.23 1.05 9.96

abbreviations: MC2 stands for MCsquare, ECL stands for the analytical dose engine of Eclipse™ver. 15.6, SD stands for standard Deviation.