Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;28:100417. doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100417

Table 1.

Performances of PAM systems using TUTs.

FC (MHz) BW (MHz) Light transmittance Acoustic focusing Rlat (µm) Scanning method B-scan frame rate Ref.
14.5 10.2 ∼80% at
690–970 nm
Not focused ∼900 Mechanicala [43]
36.9 12.5 > 80% at
450–1064 nm
Not focused < 40 Mechanicala [42]
13 9.2 ∼90% at
532 nm
Not focused 6.92 Optical 12.5 Hz
over 3 mm
[44]
24 26 > 60% at
450–1100 nm
Spherically focused 4.2 Mechanicala [46]
11.2 2.6 ∼66% at
700–900 nm
Spherically focused 312 Mechanicala [47]
31.5 8 > 70% at
500–750 nm
Spherically focused 2.4 Mechanicala [45]
34 8.8 ∼50% at
532 nm
Cylindrically focused 10 Hybrid 500 Hz
over 9 mm
This work

Fc, central frequency of the transparent ultrasound transducer; BW, bandwidth of the ultrasound transducer; Rlat, lateral resolution of the PAM system.

a

The B-scan frame rate of mechanical scanning is determined by the laser pulse repetition rate (PRR) and the scanning speed of the motorized stage. Assuming a traditional PAM setup with a PRR of 1 kHz and a scanning speed of 10 mm/s, the typical B-scan frame rate of mechanical scanning is ∼1 Hz over 10 mm.