Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 10;10:978338. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.978338

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis aldehydes exposure and kidney stones prevalence.

Characteristic Model1OR (95% CI) Model2OR (95% CI) Model3OR (95% CI)
Isopentanaldehyde (ng/mL) 1.62 (1.10, 2.38) 1.71 (1.13, 2.60) 2.47 (1.15, 5.34)
Benzaldehyde (ng/mL) 1.10 (1.01, 1.19) 1.12 (1.03, 1.22) 1.12 (1.02, 1.22)
Butyraldehyde (ng/mL) 0.92 (0.42, 1.99) 0.94 (0.42, 2.08) 0.49 (0.13, 1.88)
Heptanaldehyde (ng/mL) 2.31 (0.87, 6.11) 3.89 (1.39, 10.92) 0.62 (0.08, 4.94)
Hexanaldehyde (ng/ml) 1.10 (0.97, 1.25) 1.13 (1.01, 1.27) 1.17 (1.00, 1.36)
Propanaldehyde (ng/mL) 1.21 (0.95, 1.55) 1.21 (0.95, 1.55) 0.83 (0.50, 1.38)

Model 1, no covariates were adjusted.

Model 2, Model 1+age, sex, race were adjusted.

Model 3, Model 2 + diabetes, blood pressure, education were adjusted. Not adjusted for the stratification variable itself.