Table 3.

NL mode estimates for central urban areas

Variables	Model 1: complex trip chains			Model 2: cycling			Model 2: public transit
	Coeff	z	P	Coeff	z	P	Coeff	z	P
Individual
AGE_ 2	0.294	0.570	0.568	− 0.158	− 0.370	0.711	− 0.894	− 1.850	0.064
AGE_ 3	− 0.071	− 0.220	0.828	− 1.314	− 1.930	0.054	− 1.520	− 2.030	0.042
GEN	− 0.346	− 0.960	0.338	0.682	1.580	0.113	− 0.557	− 1.250	0.212
EDU_ 2	− 0.486	− 1.730	0.084	0.348	1.120	0.262	0.441	1.380	0.167
EDU_ 3	− 0.581	− 1.780	0.075	− 0.045	− 0.090	0.930	2.063	2.750	0.006
AIN_ 2	0.284	0.510	0.608	− 0.161	− 0.380	0.701	0.513	1.180	0.240
AIN_ 3	0.349	0.640	0.520	− 0.155	− 0.310	0.755	− 1.705	− 2.980	0.003
FBC	0.480	0.440	0.662	− 0.330	− 1.000	0.316	1.222	3.160	0.002
Household
HTY_ 2	0.159	0.640	0.521	− 0.383	− 0.840	0.403	− 1.704	− 3.230	0.001
HTY_ 3	− 0.258	− 0.950	0.342	0.177	0.340	0.731	1.849	2.500	0.012
CAV	0.296	1.190	0.232	− 0.098	− 0.280	0.780	− 0.405	− 1.060	0.289
EAV	0.067	0.180	0.853	0.067	0.250	0.806	− 0.585	− 2.050	0.040
BAV	0.109	0.380	0.701	0.568	1.890	0.059	− 0.060	− 0.180	0.854
Trip
TRD	0.011	1.050	0.294	− 0.019	− 7.020	0.000	− 0.027	− 7.890	0.000
TRT	0.008	1.200	0.230	− 0.009	− 2.190	0.029	− 0.015	− 3.040	0.002
PUR_ 1	0.684	2.430	0.015	0.321	1.130	0.257	0.390	1.280	0.199
PUR_ 2	0.014	0.040	0.972	− 0.281	− 0.820	0.413	− 0.227	− 0.620	0.532
Scale parameter	${\tau }_1=-0.592$			${\tau }_W=0.548$
	${\tau }_2=0.541$			${\tau }_C=0.485$
				${\tau }_P=0.460$
Wald	19.960	P = 0.276		235.710	P = 0.000
AIC	1955.980			1855.239
BIC	2103.529			2113.450

Bold numbers represent significant at the 10.000% level, Coeff. represents the estimation coefficient of the model