Table 5.
Significant correlations between multidimensional scaling dimensions and measures of EMS.
| Dimension 1 |
Dimension 2 |
Dimension 3 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | r range | Variable | r range | Variable | r |
| Below 4 | .391 to .809 | E3–E6 | −.433 to −.623 | Peak amplitude 2000 | −.469 |
| Above 4 | −.529 to −.731 | Peak frequencya | .346 to .568 | Peak amplitude 1000 | −.449 |
| Ratio 4 | .539 to .692 | Above 4b | −.436 to −.568 | ||
| Peak frequency | .41 to .605 | Ratio 4 | .361 to .602 | ||
| Peak amplitudec | .383 to −.695 | ||||
Note. Because of the large number of correlated variables, the results for Dimensions 1 and 2 are summarized, and the range of correlation coefficients is reported. The metrics in the table are rank ordered by level of significance (all ps < .05). Insignificant correlations are not included.
a
Not significant for the 250-Hz band or for the full spectrum.
b
Significant correlations found for the 250-, 2000-, 4000-, and 8000-Hz bands.
c
Significant correlations found for the 125-, 250-, 1000-, and 8000-Hz bands and for the full spectrum.