Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicology. 2021 May 10;457:152819. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152819

Table 2.

Species-specific reference chemical clearance (CLint) and Heat-Treated Control (HTC) recovery

Species / Reference chemical
(CAS No.)
CLint
(µL/min/106 hepatocytes)a
Concentration (µM)b n c HTC recovery % ± SD n d Source

Human / Verapamil (52–53-9) 24.1 (11.1–45.8) 0.1 10 101 ± 10 7 This study
16.4 (7.37–28.8) 1 10 100 ± 9 7

21.8 (4.65–49.0) 0.25–3 29 - - Published literaturee

Rat / Fenbuconazole (114369–43-6) 26.9 (10.6–45.5) 0.1 9 102 ± 12 7 This study
17.6 (6.79–37.6) 1 9 112 ± 43 7

3.89 1 1 - - Wetmore et al., 2013

Trout / Pyrene
(129–00-0)
27.9 (12.7–46.9) 0.1 7 115 ± 41 6 This study
7.33 (2.32–13.2) 1 7 103 ± 34 6

45.7 (19.3–66.7) 0.025–0.25 3 - - Published literaturee
a

Values shown for the present study represent means (low–high) for n runs for each starting chemical concentration measured using two lots of human and rat, and four lots of trout hepatocytes. Values given for published literature are reported as means (low–high) for n references which utilized a starting chemical concentration within 5-fold of those employed in the present study.

b

Values shown for the present study represent starting chemical concentrations. Values given for published literature represent the range of reported starting chemical concentrations (low–high).

c

Sample sizes are given as the number of CLint values determined in the present study (Table S9) or the number of values obtained from published literature

d

Sample sizes are given for the number of HTC recovery values determined for each species and starting chemical concentration

e

References for published literature on verapamil and pyrene are given in Table S10