Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 27;7(4):144. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7040144

Table 8.

The overall rank in CEC 2017 test functions (a), the bold numbers means the best performance among whole competitors.

Simple Multimodal Hybrid Functions Composition Functions
Winner Loser Score Rank Winner Loser Score Rank Winner Loser Score Rank
ESOA 2 0 8.99378 2 3 0 10.9602 1 4 0 11.9205 1
PSO [16] 0 3 1.94422 5 0 3 3.85613 5 0 2 2.82345 5
GA [5] 1 1 7.23141 4 4 0 10.5838 2 1 0 8.27331 3
DE [6] 3 1 8.71516 3 0 0 7.66103 4 2 0 9.07179 2
GWO [18] 2 0 9.01376 1 1 0 8.74242 3 1 0 7.97473 4
HHO [83] 0 3 1.62757 6 0 5 2.11415 6 0 6 0.674735 6