Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 23;15:150. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01374-5

Table 2.

Treatment outcomes

N, (%) Total
Study completion
 Cycle 3 25/32 (78.1)
 Cycle 8 7/32 (21.9)
Reasons for no completing the study
 Progression 19/25 (76.0)
 Death 2/25 (8.0)
 Others 4/25 (16.0)
  Consent withdrawal 1
  For additional treatment 3
Best response during the study
 sCR + CR 11/31 (35.5)
 VGPR 3/31 (9.7)
 PR 7/31 (22.6)
 SD 7/31 (22.6)
 PD 3/31 (9.7)
 ORR (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR) 21/31 (67.7)
 NE 1
DCEP dose reductions
 Cycle 1 (N = 32) Full dose 9/32 (28.1%); planned 30% DR 23/32 (71.9%)
 Cycle 2 (N = 29) Same dose as Cycle 1 25/29 (86.2%); dose reduction from Cycle 1 2/29 (6.9%)*; dose escalation from Cycle 1 2/29 (6.9%)
 Cycle 3 (N = 25) Same dose as Cycle 2 25/25 (100%)
DCEP dose delays
 Cycle 2 (N = 29) 4 (13.8)
 Cycle 3 (N = 25) 3 (12.0)
ASCT during clinical trial 2/32 (6.3)
 History of prior ASCT 1
 Infused CD34 cells, × 106/kg, median (range) 4.53 (3.3.41–5.65)
 Conditioning regimen
  Melphalan 200 mg/m2 2

sCR stringent complete response; CR complete response; VGPR very good partial response; PR partial response; SD stable disease; PD progressive disease; NE not evaluable; DCEP dexamethasone–cyclophosphamide–etoposide–cisplatin; ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation

*2 patients underwent additional dose reduction from Cycle 1