Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2022 Feb 11;20(10):593–607. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00692-2

Gradients and consequences of heterogeneity in biofilms

Jeanyoung Jo 1, Alexa Price-Whelan 1, Lars E P Dietrich 1,
PMCID: PMC9590228  NIHMSID: NIHMS1842703  PMID: 35149841

Abstract

Resource gradients influence, and are influenced by, metabolism and our impressions of microbial behavior in diverse ecosystems are not complete without complementary maps of the chemical and physical geographies that influence cellular activities. The interplay between gradient formation and physiology in microbial biofilms has far-reaching consequences for human health, industry, and engineering. In this Review, we discuss examples of gradient formation and physiological differentiation in biofilms growing in diverse settings. We also highlight some of the consequences of physiological heterogeneity in microbial communities, including division-of-labor and increased resistance to stress. A holistic view of microbial multicellularity, incorporating physical and chemical topography as well as the genetically encoded functions that operate within microenvironmental conditions, will be essential for understanding biofilm physiology and its many roles and potential applications.

Introduction

Multicellularity, in which cells adhere to and communicate with each other, is widespread1 and leads to the formation of physical and chemical gradients, due to physical constraints and endogenous metabolic activity. Such gradients determine the conditions of microenvironments and influence architectural development. Understanding them is key for understanding the physiology of any multicellular structure, making them important areas of study in diverse subfields, ranging from animal development to microbial ecology 2-4. For example, in the early 1900s, the zoologist Charles Manning Child found that gradients of metabolic activity and O2 consumption correlated with developmental processes in invertebrate animals and he proposed that metabolic gradients served as the templates for pattern formation in developing embryos 5.

This view was seen as opposing the role of genetics in morphogenesis 6, including genetically encoded signaling gradients, which have now been described for many animals and plants in mechanistic detail 7-10. More recently, the importance of O2 gradients in multicellular development has regained recognition and it is now appreciated that an interplay between environmental cues (such as O2) and genetically encoded mechanisms determines morphology 11. In particular, the implications of O2 exposure and limitation have taken center stage in processes such as embryogenesis, tumor development, tissue differentiation in plants, and intestinal function (Box 1, Figure 1).

Box 1: How gradients influence development and metabolism in animals and plants.

Embryos

O2 gradient formation and its effects on metabolism and signaling are crucial for embryogenesis in metazoans 148. Low-O2 conditions are required for stages of this process that occur soon after the blastocyst arrives in the uterus. The uterus itself is severely hypoxic and O2 diffusion into embryonic tissue is further impeded by the development of adjacent fluid-filled cavities. After implantation, the embryo forms the three primary germ layers along an internal O2 gradient, with conditions befitting the unique processes occurring in each layer. For example, development of the yolk sac requires the relatively high O2 levels of the endoderm, whereas the production of blood cells and development of blood vessels requires the lower O2 concentrations of the mesoderm.

Changes in O2 availability during the process of embryogenesis have consequences for energy metabolism and signaling. Generally, the metabolism carried out in animal cells consists of fermentation, which converts glucose into small organic acids and produces low levels of ATP, followed by oxidative phosphorylation, which oxidizes small organic acids via the tricarboxylic acid cycle and aerobic respiration to fuel most cellular ATP synthesis 149. As the embryo develops, its metabolism shifts from a reliance on oxidative phosphorylation towards increased use of fermentation. This change is mediated in part by subunits of the HIF family of regulatory proteins, which accumulate under low-O2 conditions and control the expression of hundreds of genes including major loci coding for metabolic enzymes and others involved in blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) 148. The metabolic shift then triggers additional downstream effects, because similar to low O2, fermentative intermediates can also act as signals to control animal development 150.

Tumors

As in healthy cells, subunits of the HIF family play major roles in orchestrating the response to hypoxia in tumor cells 151. O2 limitation disrupts oxidative phosphorylation and leads to an increased reliance on fermentation for ATP synthesis, correlating with increased production and excretion of lactate. In tumors, cellular proliferation and the development of the vascular network (which delivers resources and takes away waste products) are dysregulated 152. This leads to the formation of subzones within tumors, at distances greater than ~100 μm away from the nearest blood vessel, that experience limitation for O2 and nutrients and the accumulation of metabolic products such as lactate. Hypoxia and variable O2 availability in tumors contribute to metabolic heterogeneity and recalcitrance to cancer treatments 153. Interestingly, cellular subpopulations in tumors can engage in metabolic cross-feeding, in which lactate produced by cells in hypoxic regions can diffuse to areas with higher O2 availability and act as a substrate for aerobic metabolism 154.

Plants

In plants, most O2 production and CO2 fixation (that is, photosynthesis) occurs in specialized structures, leading to O2 gradient formation and the requirement for transport mechanisms that distribute fixed carbon to non-photosynthetic tissues 155. The localization of O2 production is important because, similar to animal development, key processes in plant development occur optimally under hypoxic conditions 156. For example, the meristems (the sites of active growth on plant roots and shoots) exhibit chronic hypoxia and treatments that increase O2 levels in these regions lead to decreased activity, as indicated by effects on leaf initiation, root development, and various molecular readouts. The ERF-VII family of proteins and the ZPR2 protein are examples of regulators that link O2 sensitivity to metabolism and development in plants.

Intestine

The mammalian intestine is lined with a polarized epithelium and contains hundreds of microbial species. In the intestine, animal and microbial cells are juxtaposed and gradient formation majorly influences the physiologies of both populations. The intestinal epithelium produces mucus and interacts with the microbiota on its apical side and receives O2 from systemic blood flow to the endothelium on its basal side. This yields a cross-sectional O2 gradient that starts with oxygenated blood in the endothelium, continues with consumption of O2 by the epithelium and by aerotolerant bacteria close to the epithelium, and culminates as O2 becomes undetectable in the lumen. This gradient is important because it enables O2 to support the viability of the epithelial cells but enables anaerobic microbial metabolisms to occur in the lumen. Both ingested compounds and microbial fermentation products act as electron donors for consumption of O2 by host cells in the intestinal epithelium 123. Increased intraluminal O2 levels have been identified as a factor that can contribute to dysbiosis and increase susceptibility to infection 157,158.

Figure 1. Oxygen gradients influence metabolic differentiation and morphogenesis in multicellular systems.

Figure 1.

(a) Schematics of a tumor, a biofilm, and a plant showing regions where O2 (dark to light shading indicates diminishing oxygen concentration) influences the activity of regulatory cascades that modulate metabolism and/or morphogenesis. Each regulatory protein is part of a pathway that links O2 sensing to physiological outputs and may play an inductive or inhibitory role. (b) Oxygen (O2, blue shading) diffuses into a biofilm and subsequent consumption by resident cells leads to O2 gradient formation. O2 gradients can result in differential gene expression within a monospecies biofilm (depicted as varying colors; c) and/or stratified growth of species (depicted as varying shapes; d) depending on O2 preferences. For (b) through (d), the top represents the interface with air or oxygenated liquid.

Although leaders in environmental microbiology, such as Winogradsky, Beijerinck, and ZoBell, had already recognized the importance of gradients for microbial communities. in the first half of the 20th century 2-4, it has recently been brought into new focus as an appreciation for multicellularity in the microbial world has become more widespread. Like the cells of animals and plants, microorganisms commonly grow and survive in structures that contain physical and chemical gradients (Figure 2). Microorganisms form multicellular structures when they are confined by the physical environment, when they form intercellular connections, or when they excrete adhesives 1. Biofilms are a specific type of multicellular structure consisting of microbial cells encased in an adhesive matrix composed of exopolysaccharides, extracellular DNA, and/or proteins 12,13. The biofilm matrix traps and retains cellular products 14 and supports the accumulation of exogenous materials, which can be modified or degraded by extracellular enzymes 15. Because it hinders diffusion, the matrix also affects physical and chemical gradients 16-18.

Figure 2. Physiological stratification of biofilms along chemical gradients.

Figure 2.

(a) The image shows fossilized stromatolites, which are structures formed by microbial mats that trap sediment and promote mineralization in layers (Satka Formation, Southern Urals; the wider columns are ~10 cm in diameter). (b) When growing in aggregates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa shows maximal expression of narG (red), which encodes an anaerobically expressed nitrate reductase, in the center (tagging by a universal probe, for rRNA, is shown in green). (c) A layered biofilm, required for production of kombucha, grows at the air-liquid interface of the tea. (d) Cross-section of a P. aeruginosa colony biofilm (top: interface with air; bottom: interface with agar-solidified medium) showing discrete zones of metabolic activity (red)49. (e) Cross-section of an E. coli colony biofilm (left panel, top view of whole biofilm shown in inset), false-colored to indicate discrete architectures that are visible at high magnification (right panels, top corresponds to the red colored zone in the cross-section, bottom corresponds to the blue zone) (. (f) Stratified growth of bacterial species in Winogradsky columns. These miniature ecosystems develop over several weeks in standing vessels containing aquatic samples that are incubated in sunlight. The enriched species depend on the nutrient conditions of the initial setup. (g) Cross-section of Humboldt Fog goat milk cheese (Cypress Grove Chevre, Inc.) showing the following layers over depth: mold (microbial fungus) at the cheese-air interface, ash (added during production to increase the pH at the surface of the cheese and promote mold growth), runny cheese, and solid core cheese. (h) Cross-section of a cyanobacterial mat from Guerrero Negro, Baja California Sur, Mexico. Part a provided by T Bosak, part b reproduced with permission from ref. 146, part c provided by J. Gowans, part d provided by L. Florek, part e reproduced with permission from ref 97, part f provided by D. Giovanelli, part h provided by J. Spear.

In this Review, and inspired by Child’s studies, we discuss the ways in which gradients lead to and result from physiological heterogeneity in multicellular microbial structures (Figure 1b-d), focusing on biofilms. Furthermore, we provide an update on physiological heterogeneity in biofilms (as reviewed previously19).

Our original intention for this Review was to describe studies demonstrating mechanistic connections between physical or chemical gradients and in situ physiological effects (such as differential gene expression) across depth in biofilms. However, our literature surveys revealed a cultural divide between approaches that quantify the physical and chemical topographies of biofilms and those that describe physiological mechanisms at the molecular level. Studies that merge these approaches are technically daunting, but are important to do because an understanding of the unique physiology and physiological heterogeneity of cells in biofilms can inform our attempts to control microbial activity in industry, agriculture, and human health. Therefore, we discuss examples that have shown molecular links between gradients and physiology and also examples in which these links are implied.

Gradient formation and division-of-labor

Multicellular structures show spatial heterogeneity both in overall level of metabolic activity and in specific metabolic pathways. In this section, we describe examples of multicellular structures that illustrate the role of gradient formation in promoting physiological heterogeneity, and vice versa. We discuss physiological heterogeneity in the context of metabolism, which is a network of redox reactions that enables cells to obtain energy and produce biomass. Microorganisms show awe-inspiring metabolic diversity, with almost every thermodynamically possible metabolism represented 20. When subpopulations carry out distinct metabolisms, there is potential for cross-feeding, which can optimize use of resources and thereby maximize growth or survival of the overall group. In this sense, cross-feeding is a form of a division-of-labor: separate subpopulations specialize in distinct metabolisms and can benefit from their neighbors 21,22. Although studies of biofilm metabolism tend to focus on one cross-fed metabolite, individual subpopulations are likely to produce multiple distinct metabolites 23,24.

As a context and foundation for understanding these examples, it is also helpful to be aware of a common trend that arises in the chemical topography of microbial ecosystems. This trend stems from the preferential consumption of O2 over other electron acceptors such as nitrate and sulphate and arises because the reduction of O2 to H2O is highly favorable when it is metabolically coupled with most available electron donors 25. O2 can also oxidize other chemical species and affect their solubility and bioavailability 20,26. The degree of oxygenation is therefore usually the primary factor that influences the overall chemistry and microbial physiology of a microenvironment 27. In many types of biofilms, the source of O2 is the interface with air or water, or with oxygenic phototrophs near this interface, so O2 concentrations decrease with depth into the biofilm. Internal microenvironments are more reduced 28,29, enabling the accumulation of molecules such as ferrous iron and sulphide 26.

Escherichia coli: carbon sources and signals

Similar to animals (Box 1), microorganisms also show metabolic diversification along O2 gradients and the potential for cross-feeding, specifically, diffusion of anaerobic metabolites that act as substrates for aerobic cells. For example, Escherichia coli can carry out anaerobic mixed-acid fermentation and aerobic respiration 30. A computer simulation of E. coli biofilms growing on glucose predicted metabolic cross-feeding: in the lower, anoxic portion of the biofilm, cells fermented glucose and released acetate, which then diffused upwards and was consumed by cells in the oxic zone. This model was experimentally validated using 13C metabolic flux analysis 31. In addition, cross-feeding of alanine in E. coli biofilms contributed to measurable growth in a specific biofilm subzone 32. In each of these cases, E. coli showed metabolic differentiation that enabled efficient use of carbon depending on microenvironmental conditions.

Metabolites can also act as cues, providing information about the environment and affecting behavior via regulatory responses. When these cues are produced by a cell for the purpose of eliciting a physiological response, they are referred to as ‘signals’. Cue and signal gradients can elicit concentration-dependent responses in microbial communities, similar to morphogen gradients in animals and plants 33,34. Cues and signals can convey various types of information, including about environmental conditions or the presence and location of other organisms. The extent at which an excreted molecule returns to the producer can be indicative of diffusibility in the surroundings, and such a cue can subsequently stimulate the cell to invest in the production of more costly degradative enzymes that support nutrient uptake 35-37. For example, E. coli and other bacteria release indole, a byproduct of tryptophan metabolism to influence a range of cellular behaviors and properties38,39. In the mammalian intestine, indole produced by the microbiota is present in a cross-sectional gradient with high concentrations (up to 1 mM) in the lumen and lower concentrations at the intestinal epithelium. This gradient can control colonization by intestinal pathogens such as Citrobacter rodentium, in which indole inhibits virulence gene expression. Indole sensing may trigger expression of genes involved in epithelial cell attachment in a location where these activities are most likely to promote colonization 40.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: exogenous substrates and endogenous metabolites

Biofilms of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa also show the potential for cross-feeding. P. aeruginosa is metabolically versatile and able to carry out or catalyze: (i) aerobic respiration, with modular electron transport chain (ETC) components that can be swapped out to tune efficiency 41-43; (ii) denitrification 44; (iii) reduction of endogenous compounds called phenazines 29; and (iv) mixed-acid fermentation 45,46. P. aeruginosa encodes five different terminal oxidases, enzymes that catalyze the final electron transfer step of the aerobic ETC. These terminal oxidases vary with respect to their affinities for O2 43, and their expression is differentially regulated 42. In P. aeruginosa biofilms, therefore, respiration not only drives the formation of O2 gradients through O2 consumption, but is also itself regulated by O2 availability 47.

Depending on substrate availability, different subpopulations can use different metabolic pathways and cross-feeding can even enable discrete subpopulations to catalyze subsequent steps in a pathway, such as denitrification 48 (Figure 3a). Phenazine metabolism, which contributes to redox balancing and overall metabolic activity 49, is integrated with respiratory and fermentative metabolisms in distinct ways. Phenazines are redox-active compounds that are reduced by P. aeruginosa when other electron acceptors are not locally available and that can transfer electrons to distant oxidants 50,51, such as O2 in a neighboring biofilm subzone. P. aeruginosa produces several phenazines, and the relative amounts of each are influenced by environmental parameters including O2 availability 47,52,53. P. aeruginosa biofilms therefore contain complex gradients of different types and redox states of phenazines 54. Microelectrode-based measurement of the redox potential in wild-type (phenazine-producing) biofilms showed that the phenazine pool becomes more reduced with depth, indicating that cells in hypoxic and anoxic zones are reducing these compounds. Mutants lacking specific ETC components form biofilms that are defective in phenazine reduction at depth, implicating the respiratory chain in this activity 29. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa phenazine reduction facilitates redox balancing during mixed-acid fermentation and promotes survival when an oxidant is provided to recycle the phenazines 46. Moreover, characterization of gene expression in liquid cultures and biofilms suggests that phenazines attenuate denitrification and mixed-acid fermentation, revealing the complex interplay between different anaerobic redox-balancing pathways 48,49.

Figure 3. Redox balancing strategies in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Figure 3.

(a) P. aeruginosa can use different metabolic pathways in biofilms. The blue shading represents the O2 gradient across depth. Yellow shading highlights mechanisms (which are shown in a simplified form) that can be used to reoxidize NADH that is generated through carbon metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA). The left panel shows aerobic respiration occurring in the upper, oxic zone near the interface with air and mixed-acid fermentation occurring in the lower, anoxic zone at the biofilm base and interface with the growth medium. One of the fermentation products, lactate, can be used as a carbon source and electron donor by cells in the oxic zone. The middle panel depicts mechanisms in which phenazines can contribute to redox balancing. In cells carrying out fermentation, phenazines can reoxidize NADH and potentially promote survival. Mutant analyses have implicated components of the electron transport chain (ETC) in phenazine reduction in biofilms. Reduced phenazines can be reoxidized in the oxic zone. The right panel depicts denitrification as an additional mechanism through which NADH can be reoxidized. (b) The aerobic ETC of P. aeruginosa is modular, such that the final electron transfer to O2 may be carried out by different terminal oxidases. Electrons from the oxidation of NADH enter the ETC and pass sequentially through the quinone pool and other carriers to the terminal oxidases (yellow), which are encoded by differentially regulated operons. The cox operon is regulated by RpoS, whereas the cco2 operon is regulated by Anr 42. (c) Opposing gradients of carbon source (orange) and O2 (blue) lead to microniches within the biofilm. (d) Three-day-old P. aeruginosa biofilms show differential expression of respiratory enzymes across depth. The sections shown contain transcriptional reporters in which GFP production is controlled by the cox or cco2 promoters, respectively. cox expression is visible in the uppermost portion of the biofilm (left panel), furthest from the carbon source, whereas cco2 expression is visible in the lower, hypoxic and anoxic biofilm subzones (right panel) 29.

Regulatory proteins that sense electron acceptors or the availability of other resources mediate metabolic specialization in P. aeruginosa biofilms. One such protein is Anr, an ortholog of E. coli Fnr. Fnr proteins contain a redox-sensitive Fe-S cluster and have roles in biofilm physiology in diverse contexts 48,55. The well-studied E. coli Fnr is a global mediator of the switch between aerobic and anaerobic metabolism 56-58. In P. aeruginosa, Anr regulates the cco2 and nir operons (involved in microaerobic respiration and denitrification, respectively) so that they are expressed specifically in the hypoxic biofilm subzone 29,48 (Figure 3b-d).

In P. aeruginosa, carbon sources are oxidized to provide the reducing power necessary for ATP generation via the ETC. Studies examining gene expression in P. aeruginosa in situ suggest links between electron acceptor availability and carbon source utilization. When P. aeruginosa biofilms are grown on glucose or pyruvate, hypoxic and oxic regions show expression of an operon that is induced by lactate. This result suggests that cells in the anoxic region (closest to the growth medium) ferment glucose or pyruvate to lactate, which diffuses to hypoxic or oxic subzones and induces gene expression 49,59. Whether other products of P. aeruginosa mixed-acid fermentation (such as acetate and succinate) are also cross-fed in this context has not been examined. The cox operon, which codes for a low-O2-affinity terminal oxidase, is another example of a locus whose expression is affected by carbon source gradients. This operon is expressed in the uppermost portion of P. aeruginosa biofilms 47, consistent with its previously reported induction by starvation 42 (Figure 3b-d).

Beyond providing insight into the integration of metabolic pathways, studies of P. aeruginosa biofilm energetics have revealed mechanistic relationships between redox state and microbial population-level behavior. When P. aeruginosa biofilms are limited for terminal electron acceptors, they increase matrix production, which increases the biofilm surface area-to-volume ratio and therefore O2 access (Figure 4a). This transition is mediated by RmcA (redox modulator of c-di-GMP), which contains four Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) domains that function in redox and phenazine sensing 60. HIF-protein regulatory networks, found in animals, have similar roles in sensing electron acceptor availability and orchestrating multicellular structural changes 61 (Box 1). In both P. aeruginosa and E. coli, mutations that disrupt ETC function drastically alter overall biofilm organization 29,62.

Figure 4. Interplay between resource gradients and biofilm architecture in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli.

Figure 4.

(a) A regulatory pathway, involving the phosphodiesterase (PDE) RmcA and diguanylate cyclase (DGC), links redox cues (in this case, oxidized phenazines) to matrix production in wild type (WT, top) and phenazine-deficient (Δphz, bottom) P. aeruginosa biofilms. Biofilms shown were grown on medium containing 1% tryptone and matrix-staining dyes 44. (b) Several regulators influence the architecture of E. coli colony biofilms. Sigma factors are shaded pink, and activities that modulate levels of cyclic diguanylate (c-di-GMP) and thereby affect matrix production are shaded cyan. The activities of the regulators are influenced by resource gradients and they control pathways with opposing effects on levels of c-di-GMP. This intracellular signal promotes production of cellulose, a component of the biofilm matrix. RpoS also promotes the synthesis of curli fibers, proteinaceous components of the matrix, via c-di-GMP-independent mechanisms. FlhDC is a transcriptional regulator that controls production of the sigma factor FliA. Both FlhDC and FliA promote production and assembly of flagella, which form a mesh-like structure at the biofilm base (not visible in micrograph on the right). Arrows indicate the overall effects of the indicated regulators and not direct interactions. Additional regulatory steps, some of which have been omitted here for simplicity, are described in detail in 101. The micrograph at the right shows an E. coli biofilm treated with a fluorescent matrix stain, reproduced with permission from 147. Part a provided by M. Smiley.

P. aeruginosa can cause various infections, including life-threatening lung infections in people with cystic fibrosis. Microorganisms in the lung can experience hypoxia due to dense packing and the accumulation of viscous material that limits diffusion 63. Sputum samples from cystic fibrosis patients contain steep oxyclines 64,65 and vary considerably in redox conditions. The species diversity and potential metabolic versatility of the communities found in cystic fibrosis lungs suggests that metabolite exchange contributes to bacterial growth and survival 66-68. Indeed, in vitro studies have shown cross-feeding between anaerobic consortia (enriched from the cystic fibrosis lung) and P. aeruginosa. Such consortia can degrade mucin, a major carbon source in the lung that cannot be used by P. aeruginosa, and convert it into excreted metabolites that support P. aeruginosa growth 69.

Cyanobacterial mats: substrate exchange

In plants, O2-producing tissues are spatially segregated from activities that function optimally under hypoxic conditions, and fixed carbon is cross-fed from photosynthetic tissues to those carrying out non-photosynthetic metabolisms (Box 1). Photosynthetic biofilms, that is, cyanobacterial mats 70, can be several centimeters thick, cover wide areas of a water or sediment surface, and show elaborate gradient formation and physiological heterogeneity. Metabolisms found in cyanobacterial mats include phototrophy and chemotrophy (use of light or chemicals as energy sources, respectively) and autotrophy and heterotrophy (use of CO2 or organic compounds as carbon sources, respectively).

Cross sections of cyanobacterial mats show layers of differently colored bacteria carrying out distinct metabolisms 71. Cyanobacteria (blue-green in color carry out oxygenic photosynthesis and fix CO2; they therefore serve as sources for gradients of O2 and organic carbon compounds in mats. Other species, such as anoxygenic phototrophs (which are purplish in color and do not produce O2) and chemotrophic sulphate-reducing bacteria, carry out redox transformations that contribute to gradients of various sulphur-containing molecules. Cyanobacterial CO2 fixation can alter the pH and availability of dissolved inorganic carbon, which promotes mineralization 72 and stratification of mats. This effect can produce a sedimentary record of biofilm formation and provides important evidence for geologists modeling the chemistry of Earth over time26,73,74 (Figure 2a).

A fundamental physical feature that influences the chemistry of cyanobacterial mats is the light gradient, which affects the types of photosynthesis and associated redox transformations that can occur at specific depths 75. Light penetration through microbial mat communities is wavelength-specific, with longer-wavelength light penetrating deeper into mats than lower-wavelength light76. Although diverse factors affect the distributions of the many types of phototrophs that can be present in mats, visible layering of bacterial pigments roughly correlates with light gradients (Figure 5). Pigments such as chlorophyll a, which have absorption maxima at shorter wavelengths, are present in greater abundance in the upper portions of mats, whereas pigments such as bacteriochlorophyll a, which have absorption maxima at longer wavelengths, are more abundant deeper in mats 76-78. These pigments are found in oxygenic and anoxygenic phototrophs, respectively, and the positioning of anoxygenic phototrophs at depth is also consistent with their use of electron donors produced by anaerobic chemotrophy, such as H2 and sulphide.

Figure 5. Gradient formation and examples of metabolite exchange in cyanobacterial mats.

Figure 5.

This simplified representation shows some of the metabolisms in cyanobacterial mats. Oxygenic and anoxygenic phototrophs produce light-harvesting pigments that are tuned to utilize light at the wavelengths and intensities associated with their specific depth in the mat. Cyanobacteria oxidize H2O and fix CO2, producing O2 and organic carbon that are consumed by aerobic chemoheterotrophs. Purple and green sulphur bacteria oxidize sulphide and produce sulphate, which is transformed back into sulphide by chemotrophic sulphate-reducers.

Because filamentous cyanobacteria closer to the top of the mat produce O2, heterotrophs that can respire this electron acceptor are typically found associated with or just below this layer 79. Due to the activity of the heterotrophs, the mat becomes gradually hypoxic and anoxic with depth. The O2 gradient may contribute to stratification of sulphate-reducing bacterial species due to their differing levels of O2 tolerance 80-82. Distinct morphotypes of sulphate-reducing bacteria parallel layers of sulphide (produced by sulphate respiration), with overall sulphide concentration increasing with depth 70,83. In addition to serving as an electron donor for anoxygenic photosynthesis, sulphide can also be used by chemotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.

Cyanobacteria in the uppermost layers of mats fix CO2 during the day, then ferment the fixed carbon compounds to produce small organic acids and H2 at night 73,84. These products of cyanobacterial fermentation serve as electron donors and/or carbon sources for anaerobic metabolisms, such as fermentation and sulphate reduction, carried out by non-phototrophs. High H2 concentrations have been measured in mats that contain lower levels of anaerobes (such as intertidal mats, which are subject to fluctuating environmental conditions that disfavor anoxic subzone formation 73), and in mats that have been treated to inhibit sulphate respiration 84—consistent with the model that H2 produced by the cyanobacteria is consumed by non-phototrophic fermentative or sulphate-reducing organisms. Phylogenetic analyses of bacterial populations across depth in submerged mats show that phyla with major representatives capable of fermentative and hydrogen- and sulphate-dependent metabolisms are abundant in the anoxic zone 85 (Figure 5). Together, these observations reveal that cyanobacterial mats can function as self-sustaining ecosystems in which carbon sources, electron donors, and electron acceptors are made and exchanged.

Non-photosynthetic microbial mats: electron donors and acceptors

Chemotrophic bacteria that can grow in the dark can also form mats and such mats often thrive in harsh environments, including contaminated water and the areas surrounding hydrocarbon seeps on the seafloor 86,87. They carry out intriguing metabolisms such as those based on sulphur transformations and anaerobic use of methane as an electron donor and carbon source, which can have significant impacts on industrial processes and the global carbon budget 86,88.

Beggiatoa spp., which are filamentous sulphur-oxidizing bacteria, were among the first novel organisms identified by Sergei Winogradsky, who founded the field of microbial ecology 89. Sulphide can reduce O2 in an abiotic reaction with a half-life of ~1 hour 90. Beggiatoa spp. grow at the interfaces between reduced and oxic zones, where they obtain energy by coupling the oxidation of sulphide to the reduction of O2. They have therefore been referred to as ‘gradient-type bacteria’ due to their localization between steep gradients of these substrates 90. Autotrophic Beggiatoa spp. produce fixed carbon that can be used by heterotrophs that associate with the mats 91,92; they also serve as prey for various microbial eukaryotes93. Beggiatoa spp. mats have demonstrated the utility of microsensors in defining the chemical topographies of biofilms and are case studies in the exploitation of environmental gradients by bacterial metabolism 90.

Anaerobic use of methane has been observed for microbial mats surrounding gas seeps in the Black Sea, which show layers of calcification and pink and black microbial growth 94. These mats produce vertical carbonate structures that track gas bubbles rising from the sea floor, and grow radially around the methane source. Sulphate present in the surrounding water acts as the electron acceptor for anaerobic methanotrophic consortia in the mats. In this case, as in Beggiatoa spp. mats, electron donors and acceptors are forming opposing gradients. In one exemplary study, labeled methane was used as an electron donor in samples of the mats. High methane consumption occurred in a mat layer that was relatively close to the interface with water and far from the methane source. These results suggest that use of methane as an electron donor relied on a confluence of substrate availabilities and provide another example that microorganisms living in steep resource gradients need to find a ‘sweet spot’ that supports growth 94.

Consequences of physiological heterogeneity

Residence in the physical and chemical gradients of a multicellular structure has consequences that reach beyond the types of energy metabolism that can be carried out by individual populations. In this section we discuss examples of such consequences for diverse microbial communities, many of which have substantial impacts on human activities and health.

Effects on growth and/or overall metabolic activity

Physiological heterogeneity can manifest as quantitative differences in metabolic activity or as differences in growth state. Cells in a specific growth state exhibit properties that tend to correlate—regardless of whether that growth state was brought on by conditions occurring in a homogeneous liquid culture or in a heterogeneous biofilm—because these properties arise from global shifts in gene expression. For example, Bacillus subtilis has three distinct cell types that can be distinguished by specific features—production, motility, or sporulation—with each of these correlating with a different overall genetic program. The ratios of these cell types in B. subtilis biofilms vary over the course of development 95. Two-day-old biofilms display all three cell types, with motile and sporulating cells partitioned to opposing ends of the biofilm (at the bottom and top, respectively), and matrix production spanning the middle region of the biofilm. The distributions of these cell types are thought to arise from pathways triggered by microenvironmental conditions. In B. subtilis and other microbial species, effects of microenvironmental conditions on matrix production, in particular, can influence the overall morphogenesis of the biofilm 96-98, similar to developmental processes in animals and plants (Box 1) 99,100.

In E. coli, the regulatory pathways that control production of matrix and appendages are elaborate, and decades of work have elucidated intracellular signals and mechanisms that determine the physiological status of a cell. These pathways can inform models of the relationship between environmental cues and biofilm stratification 101 (Figure 4b). For example, a study102 using fluorescent reporters for promoters active in different liquid-culture growth phases (exponential, exponential/stationary phase transition, and stationary) showed complex expression patterns and suggested that growth state was influenced by the opposing gradients of nutrients (from the bottom) and O2 (from the top) in the biofilms. Generally, exponential phase-like growth occurred in the middle zone, exponential/stationary phase transition-like growth was observed at the bottom, and stationary phase-like physiology was present both at the top and in a discrete band in the bottom half of the biofilm. This physiological stratification correlates with differentiation over depth in respect to matrix composition and cell morphology. Related studies showed that heterogeneous and vertically stratified expression of matrix components is important for the maintenance of biofilm integrity and structure 97,103. The physiological stratification of these E. coli colonies was linked to the development of properties that resemble those found in eukaryotic tissues (Box 1) and that confer resilience, benefitting the overall community102,104.

Similar observations have been made for P. aeruginosa. In one exemplary study, 16S rRNA and rDNA levels were used to quantify ribosomal content per cell from P. aeruginosa at various growth stages in homogenous liquid cultures; these values were then applied to biofilm cells to approximate growth state 105. Cells at the top of biofilms were in exponential-stationary phase transition-like states, whereas cells at the bottom exhibited stationary phase-like ribosomal content. mRNA quantification for biofilm subzones showed that transcriptional activity was highest in the top region. However, this region also contained transcripts coding for the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS, further indicating that cells there were physiologically similar to those at the exponential-stationary phase transition in liquid cultures. The dormancy of cells at the biofilm base was later confirmed using GFP-based pulse-chase experiments and correlated with reduced antibiotic susceptibility 106.

Supporting overall metabolic activity is a design goal in the engineering of microbial fuel cells, devices that harvest electricity from cell suspensions or biofilms. Often, these devices carry out dual purposes because they can use different types of waste as feedstock to support biofilm communities that generate current 107, and their utility has been demonstrated in applications such as powering small computers and outdoor lighting 108. Electrogenicity in pure cultures has been studied extensively in the bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens, which can grow using a poised-potential electrode as its sole electron acceptor. In a recent study 109, G. sulfurreducens grew on a poised-potential electrode with labeled acetate as the electron donor. Numerous prior studies had yielded conflicting results regarding the resource gradient that limits growth of these electrogenic biofilms: some had suggested that it was poor access to the electrode for distant cells110, whereas others indicated that it was poor diffusion of the electron donor through the biofilm111. In their system, the authors found that access to the electrode was the main determinant of metabolic activity. In addition to high metabolic activity adjacent to the electrode, they also observed a secondary band of activity at a distance of ~11-12 μm from the electrode, suggesting that cells further from the solid electron acceptor can use a distinct metabolic strategy. Intriguingly, a similar pattern of banding in metabolic activity can be observed in biofilms of P. aeruginosa when they are grown under opposing electron donor and acceptor gradients 49.

Effects on the health of hosts

Microbial communities colonize plants and animals and are influenced by the host 112,113, environmental factors 114, and metabolic interactions between microbial subpopulations 115. Host-associated biofilms can show stratification with a subpopulation at the periphery of the community performing functions that are beneficial to another subpopulation on the inside. In this section, we discuss three examples of this phenomenon, ranging from monospecies biofilms with differentiated subpopulations, to biofilms with several species from the same genus, to diverse communities with hundreds of species from different genera.

During infections by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, which is closely related to the causative agent of plague, host metabolites can trigger differential gene expression in bacterial microcolonies in deep tissue 116. Experiments using fluorescent reporter Y. pseudotuberculosis strains and a mouse model showed that the dense bacterial clusters express hmp, which encodes a nitric oxide (NO) dioxygenase, at the periphery of the microcolony (Figure 6a). Host phagocytes surrounding the microcolony produce NO and microcolonies in a host that is defective in NO production do not express hmp. When a ∆hmp strain is used in the infection model, hmp expression is visible throughout the microcolonies, indicating that NO can diffuse to the center when it is not degraded by Hmp. The ∆hmp mutant also shows decreased fitness during host infection. Expression of hmp at the periphery of wild type colonies therefore serves to protect cells on the inside from NO, and this cooperation supports robust establishment of infection in the host. This example underscores the role of phenotypic heterogeneity in contributing to the success of bacterial communities.

Figure 6. Physiological heterogeneity enhances overall biofilm robustness.

Figure 6.

(a) Microcolonies of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis grow in the spleen in a mouse model of infection. Host phagocytes produce nitric oxide (NO), and a specialized subpopulation at the periphery of the microcolony expresses the NO-detoxifying enzyme Hmp. NO exposure regulates hmp expression with protected cells inside the microcolony are not expressing the gene. Microcolonies formed by a hmp-deficient (∆hmp) mutant exhibit hmp expression throughout the structure because NO is not degraded. (b) Polymicrobial biofilm from an extracted, diseased tooth exhibit a characteristic rotund structure (top) and uneven distribution of three different categories of bacteria as shown in the model. Bacterial subpopulations were differentiated using fluorescent in situ hybridization and a fluorescence subtraction method. Co-cultures of cariogenic and commensal species of streptococci form biofilms on enamel in the laboratory, with a rotund structure similar to that observed on teeth. The three panels show a 3D reconstruction of a cluster from a mature biofilm, revealing the segregation of the two species at different heights. (c) Model depicting the cariogenic species (Streptococcus mutans; green) localized at the core of a rotund biofilm structure and surrounded by a shell of the commensal species (such as Streptococcus oralis; red), which provides protection from antimicrobials. The rotund structure is associated with a low-pH microenvironment that promotes demineralization of the enamel. Non-streptococcal bacteria (blue) are situated outside the shell of commensal streptococci. (d) The schematic depicts the orientation of the endothelium (blood vessel containing oxygenated blood) relative to the epithelial lining the intestine (top). On top of host intestinal epithelial cells, stratified populations of gut microorganisms can be found within the O2 gradient that originates at the endothelium (blood vessel). Microbial growth in the gradient is influenced by relative levels of O2 tolerance. Micrographs in part b reproduced from 121.

The human oral cavity contains complex microbial communities that show spatial segregation and gradient formation 117,118. Substrate availability influences biofilm formation and fermentation of sugars from the host diet can promote the formation of steep pH gradients in tooth-associated biofilms 119,120, which leads to the development of caries. Biofilms on teeth that were extracted from young children due to extensive decay were rotund and contained a core population of the cariogenic species Streptococcus mutans, surrounded by a layer of non-mutans streptococci, followed by an outermost layer of non-streptococcal bacteria121 (Figure 6b). Co-culturing of S. mutans and S. oralis, a non-cariogenic commensal, on tooth enamel yielded biofilms with morphology and biogeography similar to those observed on extracted teeth. This structure promoted pH gradient formation and thus dissolution of the enamel (Figure 6c). Furthermore, S. mutans benefitted from the spatial segregation of the two species because S. oralis protected it during treatment with the antimicrobial chlorhexidine.

The mammalian intestine is a fascinating example of the roles of gradients in host-associated communities due to its steep cross-sectional O2 gradient (Box 1), which transcends the host tissue to the associated microbiota 113 (Figure 6d). The mucus layer in particular is thought to contain biofilms 122. The limited amounts of O2 that are introduced into the intestine are rapidly consumed by colonizing microorganisms. Because carbohydrates and sugars are abundant, they drive (anaerobic) fermentation. Therefore, facultative and aerotolerant microorganisms are situated closer to the epithelium and strict anaerobes are present at the center of the lumen 122,123. The recent development of an ‘intestine-on-a-chip’, which can be grown with O2 conditions that mimic in vivo conditions and can support diverse, physiologically relevant microbiota, is an exciting step towards more standardized studies of the gut microbiota124.

Surviving exposure to antimicrobials

Biofilms can enhance survival during antimicrobial treatment in various ways. Here, we first will define the mechanistic categories relevant for surviving exposure to antimicrobials, then discuss these mechanisms in the context of biofilms and physiological heterogeneity. Mechanisms that contribute to surviving antimicrobials (microbial ‘recalcitrance’) can be categorized as conferring resistance, tolerance, or persistence 125. Resistance is generally heritable and involves the activity of dedicated proteins that, for example, efflux or degrade the antimicrobial compound. Such proteins therefore allow a population of microbes to grow at antimicrobial concentrations that would otherwise inhibit growth. Tolerance can be heritable or nonheritable but is exhibited by the majority of cells in a population and allows these cells to survive transient exposure to an antimicrobial. Persistence is a nonheritable property exhibited by a minority of cells in a population that survives exposure to an antimicrobial; it can therefore be thought of as tolerance that is restricted to a subpopulation 125.

Cells in biofilms display higher tolerances to antimicrobial compounds and nanoparticles than those in well-mixed liquid cultures 17,126-129. Because many antibiotics interrupt processes required for cell division, the presence of metabolically dormant populations (for example, persisters) within biofilms can hinder clearance of infections 130-132. Furthermore, the biofilm matrix contributes to antimicrobial tolerance 133 by inhibiting diffusion of antimicrobials 17,134 and enzymes embedded in the matrix can also deactivate, modify, or sequester antimicrobial compounds 135. Some cells in biofilms therefore experience low-level exposures to drugs, which can select for resistance 136. Finally, biofilm growth favors the acquisition of resistance genes via horizontal gene transfer due to the close proximity of cells and abundance of extracellular DNA 137.

Gradients can accelerate the development of bacterial drug resistance and enhance survival when pathogens are exposed to antimicrobials. A quantitative model showed that the evolutionary pathways that occur in the presence of a concentration gradient of an antibiotic are distinct from those that occur under uniform concentrations 138. Exposure of E. coli cells to a gradient of ciprofloxacin cresulted in rapid evolution of resistance, which did not develop when the antibiotic was provided at a uniform concentration 139. Incubation of P. aeruginosa biofilms with ciprofloxacin had differential effects on metabolic activity over depth, and phenazine production was an additional factor that influenced the profile of metabolic activity in response to ciprofloxacin exposure 49. P. aeruginosa biofilms showed a phenazine-dependent ciprofloxacin tolerance, and enzymes implicated in phenazine reduction were required for this enhanced tolerance, suggesting that the phenazine-supported metabolism that occurs in hypoxic biofilm subzones contributes to survival during exposure to antimicrobials 49. The fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus experiences O2 gradients during biofilm growth and reduced metabolic activity of O2-limited cells decreases their susceptibility to antifungals. Provision of O2 at the biofilm base led to increased metabolic activity and antifungal susceptibility, indicating that increasing O2 availability could improve treatment of biofilm-based infections 140. However, many infectious diseases are polymicrobial and different species show differential responses to environmental conditions. Recent work examining the responses of cystic fibrosis sputum microbiota to pH and O2 gradients indicated that species differentially adapt to distinct microenvironments and that this impacts antimicrobial susceptibility 141. Accounting for the physiological states and anticipated responses of different species present in an infection could enhance the success of treatment.

Industrial and other applications

Biofilm formation can influence microbial applications, for example, in wastewater treatment, food production, and electricity generation. In many such processes, microorganisms form communities with complex chemical topographies and rely on the interplay of diverse metabolic and signaling pathways. Yet research on these communities tends to focus on the overall process and not the molecular details of gradient formation or physiological heterogeneity. In this section, we provide a brief overview of an example from food production (cheese making) to illustrate the importance of physical and chemical gradients in a microbial application.

The microbial conversion of sugars to acids and/or alcohol is required for production of diverse foods and beverages, including fermented fruits and vegetables, cheeses, teas, and coffee. One of the foundational processes of cheese production is the anaerobic conversion of lactose to lactic acid. Some cheese production methods therefore aim to promote aerobic processes on the outside, which can produce an edible rind and limit entry of O2 into the cheese wheel. In cheeses with heterogeneous interiors, such as Emmental and Blue, the production of CO2 and/or introduction of O2 gives rise to gas pockets, and the presence of O2 inside the cheese lead to the growth of mold. In addition to gradients of O2, salt and pH gradients are also important in the production of cheese 142. Submersion in brine produces a salt gradient. In Blue cheese, the lower salt concentrations in the cheese interior allow for earlier growth of mold, which results in a faster rise in pH as the mold converts lactic acid to CO2. Finally, pH gradients can also promote the formation of other chemical gradients; for example, in cheddar production, a pH gradient formed during the salting process can promote formation of a calcium gradient 143. All of these gradients work in concert to influence the microbial communities and the final characteristics of the cheese (for example, aroma, texture, and taste) 142,144.

Concluding remarks

Molecular mechanisms in biology are typically studied in the context of either signaling or metabolism, with little cross-talk between these subfields. A focus on geneticshas resulted in detailed models of development in organisms across the tree of life (including biofilms 145), described as the products of signal transduction and regulation of gene expression. However, elements that are still lacking in many models are the fundamental ways in which local chemical and physical parameters influence multicellular behavior. These factors modulate biology by linking signaling and metabolism, and an understanding of the relationships between organisms and their environments requires us to take a holistic view of biological function that includes both sides of the signaling-metabolism dichotomy.

We surveyed the literature with such a holistic view in mind, looking for studies that examined the regulation of metabolism in the context of microbial multicellularity. We found that there was a cultural divide in the literature between descriptions of the chemical and physical gradients in microbial communities and descriptions of cellular physiology in these structures. Observations made in different studies show correlations between gradients and physiological patterns, from which inferences can be made regarding the effects of gradients on metabolism and regulation within microbial communities. However, examining these properties in the same sample and in situ will bring us closer to the goal of showing direct links between microenvironmental conditions and physiology. In this Review, we have highlighted studies providing high-resolution chemical topographies and ones enabling detection of gene expression, overall metabolic activity, and specific metabolisms without disrupting biofilm architecture. It is now possible to combine these approaches and test the roles of specific signaling and metabolic pathways in responding to the unique conditions arising in stratified, densely packed microbial structures. By bridging this cultural divide, we can better understand microbial activity outside the laboratory and may uncover fundamental relationships between microenvironmental conditions and multicellular behavior that are applicable across biology.

Acknowledgements

Work in the Dietrich laboratory is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant R01AI103369.

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lyons NA & Kolter R On the evolution of bacterial multicellularity. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 24, 21–28 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Caldwell DE & Hirsch P Growth of microorganisms in two-dimensional steady-state diffusion gradients. Can. J. Microbiol 19, 53–58 (1973). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lappin-Scott HM Claude E. Zobell--his life and contributions to biofilm microbiology. in 8th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology 6 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Babcsányi I, Meite F & Imfeld G Biogeochemical gradients and microbial communities in Winogradsky columns established with polluted wetland sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 93, (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Child CM Patterns and problems of development [by] C.M. Child vol. 820 (The University of Chicago Press, 1941). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Blackstone NW Charles Manning Child (1869-1954): the past, present, and future of metabolic signaling. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol 306, 1–7 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gurdon JB & Bourillot PY Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413, 797–803 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fankhauser C & Christie JM Plant phototropic growth. Curr. Biol 25, R384–9 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Moor AE & Itzkovitz S Spatial transcriptomics: paving the way for tissue-level systems biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 46, 126–133 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niethammer P Wound redox gradients revisited. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol 80, 13–16 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krejci A & Tennessen JM Metabolism in time and space - exploring the frontier of developmental biology. Development 144, 3193–3198 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flemming H-C et al. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 14, 563–575 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Flemming H-C et al. Who put the film in biofilm? The migration of a term from wastewater engineering to medicine and beyond. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 10 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dragoš A & Kovács ÁT The Peculiar Functions of the Bacterial Extracellular Matrix. Trends Microbiol. 25, 257–266 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Flemming H-C & Wingender J The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 8, 623–633 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rasmussen K & Lewandowski Z Microelectrode measurements of local mass transport rates in heterogeneous biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng 59, 302–309 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Costerton JW, Stewart PS & Greenberg EP Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318–1322 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Stewart PS Diffusion in biofilms. J. Bacteriol 185, 1485–1491 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stewart PS & Franklin MJ Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 6, 199–210 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nealson KH & Conrad PG Life: past, present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 354, 1923–1939 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Giri S, Waschina S, Kaleta C & Kost C Defining Division of Labor in Microbial Communities. J. Mol. Biol 431, 4712–4731 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Evans CR, Kempes CP, Price-Whelan A & Dietrich LEP Metabolic Heterogeneity and Cross-Feeding in Bacterial Multicellular Systems. Trends Microbiol. 28, 732–743 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Douglas AE The microbial exometabolome: ecological resource and architect of microbial communities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 375, 20190250 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fritts Ryan K, McCully Alexandra L & McKinlay James B Extracellular Metabolism Sets the Table for Microbial Cross-Feeding. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 85, e00135–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen J & Strous M Denitrification and aerobic respiration, hybrid electron transport chains and co-evolution. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1827, 136–144 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Konhauser KO Introduction to Geomicrobiology. (John Wiley & Sons, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fenchel T & Finlay B Oxygen and the spatial structure of microbial communities. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 83, 553–569 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bishop PL & Yu T A microelectrode study of redox potential change in biofilms. Water Sci. Technol 39, 179–185 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jo J, Cortez KL, Cornell WC, Price-Whelan A & Dietrich LE An orphan cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase subunit supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm growth and virulence. Elife 6, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dal Co A, van Vliet S & Ackermann M Emergent microscale gradients give rise to metabolic cross-feeding and antibiotic tolerance in clonal bacterial populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci 374, 20190080 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wolfsberg E, Long CP & Antoniewicz MR Metabolism in dense microbial colonies: 13C metabolic flux analysis of E. coli grown on agar identifies two distinct cell populations with acetate cross-feeding. Metab. Eng 49, 242–247 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Díaz-Pascual F et al. Alanine cross-feeding determines Escherichia coli colony growth dynamics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021.02.28.433255 (2021) doi: 10.1101/2021.02.28.433255. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Decho AW, Norman RS & Visscher PT Quorum sensing in natural environments: emerging views from microbial mats. Trends Microbiol. 18, 73–80 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wolpert L Positional Information and Pattern Formation. in Current Topics in Developmental Biology (ed. Wassarman PM) vol. 117 597–608 (Academic Press, 2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Redfield RJ Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 10, 365–370 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hense BA et al. Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? Nat. Rev. Microbiol 5, 230–239 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.West SA, Winzer K, Gardner A & Diggle SP Quorum sensing and the confusion about diffusion. Trends Microbiol. 20, 586–594 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee J-H, Wood TK & Lee J Roles of indole as an interspecies and interkingdom signaling molecule. Trends Microbiol. 23, 707–718 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zarkan A, Liu J, Matuszewska M, Gaimster H & Summers DK Local and Universal Action: The Paradoxes of Indole Signalling in Bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 28, 566–577 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar A & Sperandio V Indole Signaling at the Host-Microbiota-Pathogen Interface. MBio 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Comolli JC & Donohue TJ Differences in two Pseudomonas aeruginosa cbb3 cytochrome oxidases. Mol. Microbiol 51, 1193–1203 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kawakami T, Kuroki M, Ishii M, Igarashi Y & Arai H Differential expression of multiple terminal oxidases for aerobic respiration in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol 12, 1399–1412 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Arai H et al. Enzymatic characterization and in vivo function of five terminal oxidases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol 196, 4206–4215 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dietrich LEP et al. Bacterial community morphogenesis is intimately linked to the intracellular redox state. J. Bacteriol 195, 1371–1380 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eschbach M et al. Long-term anaerobic survival of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa via pyruvate fermentation. J. Bacteriol 186, 4596–4604 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Glasser NR, Kern SE & Newman DK Phenazine redox cycling enhances anaerobic survival in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by facilitating generation of ATP and a proton-motive force. Mol. Microbiol (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jo J, Price-Whelan A, Cornell WC & Dietrich LEP Interdependency of Respiratory Metabolism and Phenazine-Associated Physiology in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol 202, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lin Y-C et al. Phenazines Regulate Nap-Dependent Denitrification in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. J. Bacteriol 200, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schiessl KT et al. Phenazine production promotes antibiotic tolerance and metabolic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nat. Commun 10, 762 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang Y & Newman DK Redox reactions of phenazine antibiotics with ferric (hydr)oxides and molecular oxygen. Environ. Sci. Technol 42, 2380–2386 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saunders SH et al. Extracellular DNA Promotes Efficient Extracellular Electron Transfer by Pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Cell (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Greenhagen BT et al. Crystal structure of the pyocyanin biosynthetic protein PhzS. Biochemistry 47, 5281–5289 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sakhtah H et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa efflux pump MexGHI-OpmD transports a natural phenazine that controls gene expression and biofilm development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, E3538–47 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bellin DL et al. Electrochemical camera chip for simultaneous imaging of multiple metabolites in biofilms. Nat. Commun 7, 10535 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Crofts AA et al. Enterotoxigenic E. coli virulence gene regulation in human infections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 115, E8968–E8976 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lambden PR & Guest JR Mutants of Escherichia coliK12 unable to use fumarate as an anaerobic electron acceptor. Microbiology 97, 145–160 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kiley PJ & Beinert H Oxygen sensing by the global regulator, FNR: the role of the iron-sulfur cluster. FEMS Microbiology Reviews vol. 22 341–352 Preprint at 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1998.tb00375.x (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Myers KS et al. Genome-scale analysis of escherichia coli FNR reveals complex features of transcription factor binding. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003565 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lin Y-C, Cornell WC, Jo J, Price-Whelan A & Dietrich LEP The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Complement of Lactate Dehydrogenases Enables Use of d- and l-Lactate and Metabolic Cross-Feeding. MBio 9, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Okegbe C et al. Electron-shuttling antibiotics structure bacterial communities by modulating cellular levels of c-di-GMP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A (2017) doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700264114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fong G-H & Takeda K Role and regulation of prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins. Cell Death Differ. 15, 635–641 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Beebout CJ et al. Respiratory Heterogeneity Shapes Biofilm Formation and Host Colonization in Uropathogenic Escherichia coli. MBio 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Worlitzsch D et al. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Invest 109, 317–325 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kolpen M et al. Nitrous oxide production in sputum from cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection. PLoS One 9, e84353 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cowley ES, Kopf SH, LaRiviere A, Ziebis W & Newman DK Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis Sputum Can Be Chemically Dynamic, Anoxic, and Extremely Reduced Due to Hydrogen Sulfide Formation. MBio 6, e00767 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Quinn RA et al. Biogeochemical forces shape the composition and physiology of polymicrobial communities in the cystic fibrosis lung. MBio 5, e00956–13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cendra MDM, Blanco-Cabra N, Pedraz L & Torrents E Optimal environmental and culture conditions allow the in vitro coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in stable biofilms. Sci. Rep 9, 16284 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.DePas WH et al. Exposing the Three-Dimensional Biogeography and Metabolic States of Pathogens in Cystic Fibrosis Sputum via Hydrogel Embedding, Clearing, and rRNA Labeling. MBio 7, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Flynn JM, Niccum D, Dunitz JM & Hunter RC Evidence and Role for Bacterial Mucin Degradation in Cystic Fibrosis Airway Disease. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005846 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ley RE et al. Unexpected diversity and complexity of the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 72, 3685–3695 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Prieto-Barajas CM, Valencia-Cantero E & Santoyo G Microbial mat ecosystems: Structure types, functional diversity, and biotechnological application. Electron. J. Biotechnol 31, 48–56 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dupraz C et al. Processes of carbonate precipitation in modern microbial mats. Earth-Sci. Rev 96, 141–162 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hoehler TM, Bebout BM & Des Marais DJ The role of microbial mats in the production of reduced gases on the early Earth. Nature 412, 324–327 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bosak T, Knoll AH & Petroff AP The Meaning of Stromatolites. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci 41, 21–44 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wagner K, Besemer K, Burns NR, Battin TJ & Bengtsson MM Light availability affects stream biofilm bacterial community composition and function, but not diversity. Environ. Microbiol 17, 5036–5047 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mobberley JM et al. Organismal and spatial partitioning of energy and macronutrient transformations within a hypersaline mat. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 93, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Airs RL & Keely BJ A high resolution study of the chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll pigment distributions in a calcite/gypsum microbial mat. Org. Geochem 34, 539–551 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ohkubo S & Miyashita H A niche for cyanobacteria producing chlorophyll f within a microbial mat. ISME J. 11, 2368–2378 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Abed RMM, Kohls K, Leloup J & de Beer D Abundance and diversity of aerobic heterotrophic microorganisms and their interaction with cyanobacteria in the oxic layer of an intertidal hypersaline cyanobacterial mat. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 94, (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cypionka H, Widdel F & Pfennig N Survival of sulfate-reducing bacteria after oxygen stress, and growth in sulfate-free oxygen-sulfide gradients. FEMS Microbiology Letters vol. 31 39–45 Preprint at 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1985.tb01129.x (1985). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Canfield DE & Des Marais DJ Aerobic sulfate reduction in microbial mats. Science 251, 1471–1473 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Santegoeds CM, Ferdelman TG, Muyzer G & de Beer D Structural and functional dynamics of sulfate-reducing populations in bacterial biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 64, 3731–3739 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fike DA, Gammon CL, Ziebis W & Orphan VJ Micron-scale mapping of sulfur cycling across the oxycline of a cyanobacterial mat: a paired nanoSIMS and CARD-FISH approach. ISME J. 2, 749–759 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lee JZ et al. Fermentation couples Chloroflexi and sulfate-reducing bacteria to Cyanobacteria in hypersaline microbial mats. Front. Microbiol 5, 61 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Harris JK et al. Phylogenetic stratigraphy in the Guerrero Negro hypersaline microbial mat. The ISME Journal vol. 7 50–60 Preprint at 10.1038/ismej.2012.79 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ruff SE et al. Global dispersion and local diversification of the methane seep microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 112, 4015–4020 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Drewniak L et al. Physiological and Metagenomic Analyses of Microbial Mats Involved in Self-Purification of Mine Waters Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Front. Microbiol 7, 1252 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Lin S et al. Biological sulfur oxidation in wastewater treatment: A review of emerging opportunities. Water Res. 143, 399–415 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dworkin M Sergei Winogradsky: a founder of modern microbiology and the first microbial ecologist. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 36, 364–379 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jørgensen BB & Revsbech NP Colorless Sulfur Bacteria, Beggiatoa spp. and Thiovulum spp., in O(2) and H(2)S Microgradients. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 45, 1261–1270 (1983). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Nelson DC, Wirsen CO & Jannasch HW Characterization of Large, Autotrophic Beggiatoa spp. Abundant at Hydrothermal Vents of the Guaymas Basin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 55, 2909–2917 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kreutzmann A-C & Schulz-Vogt HN Oxidation of Molecular Hydrogen by a Chemolithoautotrophic Beggiatoa Strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 82, 2527–2536 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Pasulka A et al. SSU-rRNA Gene Sequencing Survey of Benthic Microbial Eukaryotes from Guaymas Basin Hydrothermal Vent. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol 66, 637–653 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Treude T et al. Consumption of methane and CO2 by methanotrophic microbial mats from gas seeps of the anoxic Black Sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 73, 2271–2283 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R & Kolter R Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Dev. 22, 945–953 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kolodkin-Gal I et al. Respiration control of multicellularity in Bacillus subtilis by a complex of the cytochrome chain with a membrane-embedded histidine kinase. Genes Dev. 27, 887–899 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Serra DO & Hengge R Stress responses go three dimensional--the spatial order of physiological differentiation in bacterial macrocolony biofilms. Environ. Microbiol 16, 1455–1471 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Okegbe C, Price-Whelan A & Dietrich LEP Redox-driven regulation of microbial community morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 18, 39–45 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zacharia VM et al. Genetic Network Architecture and Environmental Cues Drive Spatial Organization of Phenotypic Division of Labor in Streptomyces coelicolor. MBio 12, (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Váchová L & Palková Z How structured yeast multicellular communities live, age and die? FEMS Yeast Res. 18, (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hengge R Linking bacterial growth, survival, and multicellularity - small signaling molecules as triggers and drivers. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 55, 57–66 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Klauck G, Serra DO, Possling A & Hengge R Spatial organization of different sigma factor activities and c-di-GMP signalling within the three-dimensional landscape of a bacterial biofilm. Open Biol. 8, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Serra DO, Klauck G & Hengge R Vertical stratification of matrix production is essential for physical integrity and architecture of macrocolony biofilms of Escherichia coli. Environ. Microbiol 17, 5073–5088 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Serra DO, Richter AM & Hengge R Cellulose as an architectural element in spatially structured Escherichia coli biofilms. J. Bacteriol 195, 5540–5554 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pérez-Osorio AC, Williamson KS & Franklin MJ Heterogeneous rpoS and rhlR mRNA levels and 16S rRNA/rDNA (rRNA gene) ratios within Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, sampled by laser capture microdissection. J. Bacteriol 192, 2991–3000 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Williamson KS, Richards LA, Perez-Osorio AC, Pitts B, McInnerney K, Stewart PS, Franklin MJ Heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms includes expression of ribosome hibernation factors in the antibiotic-tolerant subpopulation and hypoxia-induced stress response in the metabolically active population. J. Bacteriol 194:2062–2073 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Santoro C, Arbizzani C, Erable B & Ieropoulos I Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review. J. Power Sources 356, 225–244 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Walter XA et al. From the lab to the field: Self-stratifying microbial fuel cells stacks directly powering lights. Appl. Energy 277, 115514 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chadwick GL, Jiménez Otero F, Gralnick JA, Bond DR & Orphan VJ NanoSIMS imaging reveals metabolic stratification within current-producing biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 116, 20716–20724 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lebedev N, Strycharz-Glaven SM & Tender LM Spatially Resolved Confocal Resonant Raman Microscopic Analysis of Anode-GrownGeobacter sulfurreducensBiofilms. ChemPhysChem vol. 15 320–327 Preprint at 10.1002/cphc.201300984 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Renslow R et al. Metabolic spatial variability in electrode-respiring Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms. Energy Environ. Sci 6, 1827–1836 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Beauregard PB, Chai Y, Vlamakis H, Losick R & Kolter R Bacillus subtilis biofilm induction by plant polysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 110, E1621–30 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Pereira FC & Berry D Microbial nutrient niches in the gut. Environ. Microbiol 19, 1366–1378 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Rudrappa T, Biedrzycki ML & Bais HP Causes and consequences of plant-associated biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 64, 153–166 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Stacy A, Fleming D, Lamont RJ, Rumbaugh KP & Whiteley M A Commensal Bacterium Promotes Virulence of an Opportunistic Pathogen via Cross-Respiration. mBio vol. 7 Preprint at 10.1128/mbio.00782-16 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Davis KM, Mohammadi S & Isberg RR Community behavior and spatial regulation within a bacterial microcolony in deep tissue sites serves to protect against host attack. Cell Host Microbe 17, 21–31 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.von Ohle C et al. Real-time microsensor measurement of local metabolic activities in ex vivo dental biofilms exposed to sucrose and treated with chlorhexidine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 76, 2326–2334 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Mark Welch JL, Dewhirst FE & Borisy GG Biogeography of the Oral Microbiome: The Site-Specialist Hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 73, 335–358 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Xiao J et al. Biofilm three-dimensional architecture influences in situ pH distribution pattern on the human enamel surface. Int. J. Oral Sci 9, 74–79 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H & Koo H Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 26, 229–242 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Kim D et al. Spatial mapping of polymicrobial communities reveals a precise biogeography associated with human dental caries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 117, 12375–12386 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Donaldson GP, Lee SM & Mazmanian SK Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 14, 20–32 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zheng L, Kelly CJ & Colgan SP Physiologic hypoxia and oxygen homeostasis in the healthy intestine. A Review in the Theme: Cellular Responses to Hypoxia. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol 309, C350–60 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Jalili-Firoozinezhad S et al. A complex human gut microbiome cultured in an anaerobic intestine-on-a-chip. Nat Biomed Eng 3, 520–531 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O & Balaban NQ Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 14, 320–330 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Anderson GG & O’Toole GA Innate and induced resistance mechanisms of bacterial biofilms. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol 322, 85–105 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Høiby N et al. The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Oral Sci 3, 55–65 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Rocha-Granados MC, Zenick B, Englander HE & Mok WWK The social network: Impact of host and microbial interactions on bacterial antibiotic tolerance and persistence. Cell. Signal 75, 109750 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Königs AM, Flemming H-C & Wingender J Nanosilver induces a non-culturable but metabolically active state in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol 6, 395 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Borriello G et al. Oxygen limitation contributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 48, 2659–2664 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Balaban NQ et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol (2019) doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yan J & Bassler BL Surviving as a Community: Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence in Bacterial Biofilms. Cell Host Microbe 26, 15–21 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jennings LK et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates in cystic fibrosis sputum produce exopolysaccharides that likely impede current therapies. Cell Rep. 34, 108782 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Koo H, Allan RN, Howlin RP, Stoodley P & Hall-Stoodley L Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol (2017) doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Hall CW & Mah T-F Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev 41, 276–301 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Andersson DI & Hughes D Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 12, 465–478 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S & Ciofu O Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35, 322–332 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hermsen R, Deris JB & Hwa T On the rapidity of antibiotic resistance evolution facilitated by a concentration gradient. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 109, 10775–10780 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zhang Q et al. Acceleration of Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance in Connected Microenvironments. Science vol. 333 1764–1767 Preprint at 10.1126/science.1208747 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Kowalski CH, Morelli KA, Schultz D, Nadell CD & Cramer RA Fungal biofilm architecture produces hypoxic microenvironments that drive antifungal resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 117, 22473–22483 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Quinn RA et al. Niche partitioning of a pathogenic microbiome driven by chemical gradients. Sci Adv 4, eaau1908 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cantor MD, van den Tempel T, Hansen TK & Ardö Y Chapter 37 - Blue Cheese. in Cheese (Fourth Edition) (eds. McSweeney PLH, Fox PF, Cotter PD & Everett DW) 929–954 (Academic Press, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ong L et al. Chapter 33 - Cheddar Cheese and Related Dry-Salted Cheese Varieties. in Cheese (Fourth Edition) (eds. McSweeney PLH, Fox PF, Cotter PD & Everett DW) 829–863 (Academic Press, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Abraham S, Cachon R, Colas B, Feron G & De Coninck J Eh and pH gradients in Camembert cheese during ripening: Measurements using microelectrodes and correlations with texture. Int. Dairy J 17, 954–960 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Monds RD & O’Toole GA The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review. Trends Microbiol. 17, 73–87 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Jorth P, Spero MA, Livingston J & Newman DK Quantitative Visualization of Gene Expression in Mucoid and Nonmucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Aggregates Reveals Localized Peak Expression of Alginate in the Hypoxic Zone. MBio 10, (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Serra DO & Hengge R A c-di-GMP-Based Switch Controls Local Heterogeneity of Extracellular Matrix Synthesis which Is Crucial for Integrity and Morphogenesis of Escherichia coli Macrocolony Biofilms. J. Mol. Biol 431, 4775–4793 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Hansen JM, Jones DP & Harris C The Redox Theory of Development. Antioxid. Redox Signal 32, 715–740 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Vander Heiden MG & DeBerardinis RJ Understanding the Intersections between Metabolism and Cancer Biology. Cell 168, 657–669 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Miyazawa H & Aulehla A Revisiting the role of metabolism during development. Development 145, (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Carmeliet P et al. Role of HIF-1alpha in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumour angiogenesis. Nature 394, 485–490 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Stamatelos SK, Bhargava A, Kim E, Popel AS & Pathak AP Tumor Ensemble-Based Modeling and Visualization of Emergent Angiogenic Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer. Sci. Rep 9, 5276 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Hobson-Gutierrez SA & Carmona-Fontaine C The metabolic axis of macrophage and immune cell polarization. Dis. Model. Mech 11, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Lyssiotis CA & Kimmelman AC Metabolic Interactions in the Tumor Microenvironment. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 863–875 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Gifford RM & Evans LT Photosynthesis, Carbon Partitioning, and Yield. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol 32, 485–509 (1981). [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Weits DA, van Dongen JT & Licausi F Molecular oxygen as a signaling component in plant development. New Phytol. 229, 24–35 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.De Weirdt R & Van de Wiele T Micromanagement in the gut: microenvironmental factors govern colon mucosal biofilm structure and functionality. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 1, 15026 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Rivera-Chávez F, Lopez CA & Bäumler AJ Oxygen as a driver of gut dysbiosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med 105, 93–101 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES