Table 2.
Radiation dosing and toxicity outcomes compared among the present study and previous studies that supplemented external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL)
| Fonteyne et al (2008) [10] | Schild et al (2014) [7] | Ippolito et al (2015) [12] | FLAME trial (2020) [14] | Present study | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prostate dose (boost dose) | 78 Gy (81–82 Gy) | 75.6–77.4 Gy (83 Gy) | 72 Gy (80 Gy) | 77 Gy (95 Gy) | 78 Gy/60 Gy (87.75 Gy/70 Gy) |
| No. patients | 230 | 78 | 40 | 571 | 45 |
| Median F/U | 9 months | 36 months | 19 months | 72 months | 20 months |
| Acute GU toxicity | Grade 2 = 41% Grade 3 = 7% No grade 4 |
Grade 2 = 53% No grade 3–4 |
Grade 2 = 30% Grade 3 = 2.5% No grade 4 |
= grade 2 = 42.3%* (Report in 2007) [23] | Grade 2 = 26.7% Grade 3 = 2.2% No grade 4 |
| Acute GI toxicity | Grade 2 = 11% No grade 3–4 |
Grade 2 = 19% No grade 3–4 |
Grade 2 = 15% Grade 3 = 5% No grade 4 |
≥ grade 2 = 14.8%* (Report in 2007) [23] | Grade 2 = 6.7% Grade 3 = 2.2% No grade 4 |
| Late GU toxicity | N/A | Grade 2 = 26% Grade 3 = 3% No grade 4 |
Grade 2 = 5% Grade 3 = N/A Grade 4 = 2.5% |
≥ grade 2 = 28% | Grade 2 = 8.9% No grade 3–4 |
| Late GI toxicity | N/A | Grade 2 = 4% Grade 3 = 0% No grade 4 |
Grade 2 = 2.5% Grade 3 = 2.5% No grade 4 |
≥ grade 2 = 13% | Grade 2 = 2.2% No grade 3–4 |
GU — genitourinary; GI — gastrointestinal