Skip to main content
. 2022 May 19;27(2):260–267. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0041

Table 2.

Radiation dosing and toxicity outcomes compared among the present study and previous studies that supplemented external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL)

Fonteyne et al (2008) [10] Schild et al (2014) [7] Ippolito et al (2015) [12] FLAME trial (2020) [14] Present study
Prostate dose (boost dose) 78 Gy (81–82 Gy) 75.6–77.4 Gy (83 Gy) 72 Gy (80 Gy) 77 Gy (95 Gy) 78 Gy/60 Gy (87.75 Gy/70 Gy)
No. patients 230 78 40 571 45
Median F/U 9 months 36 months 19 months 72 months 20 months
Acute GU toxicity Grade 2 = 41%
Grade 3 = 7%
No grade 4
Grade 2 = 53%
No grade 3–4
Grade 2 = 30%
Grade 3 = 2.5%
No grade 4
= grade 2 = 42.3%* (Report in 2007) [23] Grade 2 = 26.7%
Grade 3 = 2.2%
No grade 4
Acute GI toxicity Grade 2 = 11%
No grade 3–4
Grade 2 = 19%
No grade 3–4
Grade 2 = 15%
Grade 3 = 5%
No grade 4
≥ grade 2 = 14.8%* (Report in 2007) [23] Grade 2 = 6.7%
Grade 3 = 2.2%
No grade 4
Late GU toxicity N/A Grade 2 = 26%
Grade 3 = 3%
No grade 4
Grade 2 = 5%
Grade 3 = N/A
Grade 4 = 2.5%
≥ grade 2 = 28% Grade 2 = 8.9%
No grade 3–4
Late GI toxicity N/A Grade 2 = 4%
Grade 3 = 0%
No grade 4
Grade 2 = 2.5%
Grade 3 = 2.5%
No grade 4
≥ grade 2 = 13% Grade 2 = 2.2%
No grade 3–4

GU — genitourinary; GI — gastrointestinal