Table 3.
Rehabilitation group | MLD group | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Before intervention | After intervention | Baseline | Before intervention | After intervention | Group *Time | Group | Time | |
VAS | 0 | 3.9(2.6) | 0.9(1.2) | 0.5(1.2) | 4.6(2.4) | 0.5(1.2) | P = .786 | P = .498 | P < .001‡ |
Foeldi scale | 0 | 1.1 (0.2) | 0.9 (0.4) | 0.3 (0.5) | 1 | 1 | P = .144 | P = .172 | P < .001 |
Miller grade | 0 | 1.3 (0.6) | 1 (0.5) | 0.3 (0.5) | 1.1 (0.2) | 1 | P = .123 | P = .987 | P < .001 |
Facial distances (cm) | |||||||||
Rt | 82 (2.9) | 87.3 (10.5) | 86.9 (6.8) | 80 (6.2) | 83.4 (11.1) | 80.6 (9.1) | P = .462 | P = .224 | P < .001‡ |
Lt | 82.5 (3.8) | 86.4 (5) | 85.5 (5.8) | 81.4 (6.1) | 85 (10.7) | 87.1 (8.2) | P = .29 | P = .258 | P < .001 |
SBD (mm) Rt zygomatic arch |
9.2 (1.9) | 10.3 (3.6) | 8.3 (1.1) | 8.6 (1.7) | P = .387 | P = .083 | P = .133 | ||
Rt ascending mandibular ramus |
30.3(10.4) $ | 23.1(4.9) # | 21.7 (4.5)$‡ | 19.6 (5)#‡ | P = .659 | P < .0001$# | P = .106 | ||
Rt horizontal mandible | 29.5(6.6) $‡ | 22.4(5.5) #‡ | 20.9 (4.8) $‡ | 18.8 (5.5) #‡ | P = .02$# | P < .0001$# | P < .0001‡ | ||
Lt zygomatic arch | 8.6(1.2) | 9.7 (2.5) | 9.6 (6.1) | 9.8 (2.6) | P = .639 | P = .602 | P = .414 | ||
Lt ascending mandibular ramus |
25.7(6.5) ‡ | 20.7 (1.1) ‡ | 24 (8.6) ‡ | 22.3 (4.6) ‡ | P = .888 | P = .322 | P < .001‡ | ||
Lt horizontal mandible | 24.9(7) ‡ | 18.2(3.6) ‡ | 23.5 (8.6) ‡ | 24.5 (4.8) ‡ | P = .574 | P = .68 | P < .001‡ |
MLD = manual lymphatic drainage, SBD = skin-to-bone distance, VAS = visual analog pain scale.
In the Generalized Linear Models analysis:
‡ P < .05 the data before intervention compared with after intervention.
$ P < .05 the data of the rehabilitation group compared with that of the MLD group before intervention.
# P < .05 the data of the rehabilitation group compared with that of the MLD group after intervention.
P < .05 the data of the rehabilitation group compared with that of the MLD group.