Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):e4614. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004614

Table 1.

Among the 21 Patients Who Underwent Nerve Transfer to Improve Shoulder Function, Four Patients Sustained Their Axillary Nerve Injury during Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty and One during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery

Patient Characteristics and Outcome Measure Double Nerve Transfer after Shoulder Surgery, Mean (SD)
Age 64.25 (7.08)
n = 4
Range, 54–73
Injury to surgery (d) 197.5 (91.18)
n = 4
Range, 77–327
Follow-up (d) 463.25 (248.71)
n = 4
Range, 236–873
Preoperative shoulder abduction (MRC-MS) 1.75 (1.09)
n = 4
Range, 0–3
Postoperative shoulder abduction (MRC-MS) 2.25 (0.43)
n = 4
Range, 2–3
Shoulder abduction mean difference in MRC-MS 0.5 (0.86)
n = 4
Range, 0–2
No. patients with final MRC-MS ≥4 0 (0/4)
Video measured shoulder abduction AROM 36.5 (9.5)
n = 2
Range, 28–46
Video measured shoulder flexion AROM 56.0 (12.0)
n = 2
Range, 45–69
DASH score 26.3 (15.4)
n = 2
Range, 11–42

These patients were noted to have particularly poor outcomes and were excluded from subsequent analysis. AROM, active range of motion.