TABLE 1.
Statistical comparison of the machine tunes. Machine tunes significantly different between signal-to-noise groups are shown on the left. Machine tunes significantly different between signal-to-background groups are shown on the right. In both cases, three statistical tests were applied for each comparison (Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney U, Kruskall), followed by FDR correction for multiple testing. The biggest significant p-value is reported. Sign of linear relationship is shown, where the medians of two distributions were different.
| Signal-to-noise | Signal-to-background | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting | Sign | p-value | Setting | Sign | p-value |
| Acc_Focus | — | 0.0118 | Amp_Offset | 0.0044 | |
| Amp_Offset | <0.0001 | InstrumentFW | + | 0.0414 | |
| Bot_Slit | + | 0.0229 | Length_of_Transients | 0.0443 | |
| Cell_Entr | + | 0.0433 | Lens_2 | 0.0414 | |
| Cell_Exit | 0.0206 | Lens_2_RF_Ph | 0.0255 | ||
| InstrumentFW | + | 0.0001 | MCP | 0.0034 | |
| Lens_2 | 0.0007 | Oct_1_RF_Vpp_1 | 0.0003 | ||
| Lens_2_RF_Ph | 0.0007 | Puller_Offset | 0.0044 | ||
| MCP | + | 0.0001 | TOF_Vac | — | 0.0091 |
| Mirror_Mid | + | 0.0156 | Top_Slit | + | 0.0044 |
| Oct_1_RF_Vpp_1 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Puller_Offset | 0.0001 | ||||
| TOF_Vac | — | 0.0003 | |||
| Top_Slit | + | <0.0001 | |||