Table 1.
Table of concordance of marks made on Stereology grids (one table/marker) by two experts (second column).
| P15 Bim | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P25 Mcl-1 | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P19 P-ERK | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labeled mark | 73.04% | 99.33% | Labeled mark | 86.53% | 92.77% | Labeled mark | 90.00% | 89.08% |
| Unlabeled mark | 96.17% | 83.58% | Unlabeled mark | 93.73% | 91.87% | Unlabeled mark | 98.32% | 90.73% |
| Total mark | 413 | 316 | Total mark | 1772 | 1483 | Total mark | 507 | 450 |
| P18 Bim | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P29 Mcl-1 | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P26 P-ERK | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP |
| Labeled mark | 63.23% | 96.94% | Labeled mark | 71.96% | 93.04% | Labeled mark | 83.93% | 100.00% |
| Unlabeled mark | 87.31% | 94.48% | Unlabeled mark | 96.03% | 50.46% | Unlabeled mark | 99.06% | 81.92% |
| Total mark | 549 | 420 | Total mark | 1933 | 1066 | Total mark | 1541 | 1252 |
| P26 Bim | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P37 Mcl-1 | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP | P36 P-ERK | Expert 1 vs. 2 | Experts vs. IP |
| Labeled mark | 73.31% | 99.51% | Labeled mark | 83.78% | 95.75% | Labeled mark | 74.84% | 89.08% |
| Unlabeled mark | 82.39% | 89.77% | Unlabeled mark | 94.92% | 84.05% | Unlabeled mark | 97.89% | 85.21% |
| Total mark | 1479 | 1091 | Total mark | 2762 | 2207 | Total mark | 2687 | 2188 |
Marks common to both experts were used for calibration and then compared to IP (third column).