Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 16;14(10):581–596. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.581

Table 3.

Comparing Photodynamic therapy to endobiliary radiofrequency ablation

Treatment type
Mechanism
Adverse events
Pros
Cons
Photodynamic therapy Photosensitizing agent is given intravenously 3-4 d prior to accumulate in tissue; then, a fiberoptic probe is introduced to transmit laser light (approximately 630 nm)-apoptosis, necrosis, and immunomodulatory effect Phototoxicity, erythema, pruritus, blistering, and diffuse pain Light waves can refract to the proximal biliary tree, beyond the reach of the guidewire Expensive; highly specialized equipment needed; decreased quality of life (avoid direct sunlight 4-6 wk after treatment); limited to high specialized centers; lack of FDA approval
Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation High frequency electromagnetic energy-cell death via thermal energy, coagulative necrosis, and indirect anti-tumor lymphocyte activation Pancreatitis, cholecystitis, cholangitis hemobilia, abdominal pain Widely available Lack of standardization; potentially need > 1 session; can only be performed under fluoroscopy