Table 3.
Comparison of different strategies
| Strategy | Total infectious individuals (TI) | Total averted infectious individuals (TA) | Infection averted ratio (IAR) (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Without control | 957415707 | – | – |
| Strategy A | 317432872 | 639982835 | 66.8448 |
| Strategy B | 70587639 | 886828068 | 92.6273 |
| Strategy C | 223665375 | 733750332 | 76.6386 |
| Strategy D | 341337640 | 616078067 | 64.3480 |
| Strategy E | 858030717 | 99384990 | 10.3805 |
| Strategy F | 300099591 | 657316116 | 68.6552 |
| Strategy G | 68720573 | 888695134 | 92.8223 |
| Strategy H | 223180568 | 734235139 | 76.6893 |
| Strategy I | 63435930 | 893979777 | 93.3743 |
| Strategy J | 299216465 | 658199242 | 68.7475 |
| Strategy K | 61277926 | 896137781 | 93.5997 |