Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;11:e78427. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78427

Table 2. Per hospital-onset COVID-19 infection (HOCI) implementation and outcome summary by study intervention phase, overall and within the 7/14 sites included in the ’per protocol’ sensitivity analysis.

All study sites Sensitivity analysis
Study phase Total Study phase
Longer-turnaround Rapid Longer-turnaround Rapid
N HOCI cases 373 947 1320 143 533
Implementation
Sequence returned within expected timeline, n (%)* 229 (61.4) 377 (39.8) 606 (45.9) 81 (56.6) 204 (38.3)
Sequence returned within study period, n (%)* 277 (74.3) 596 (62.9) 873 (66.1) 98 (68.5) 347 (65.1)
SRT report returned within target timeline (10 days for longer-turnaround, 2 days for rapid), n (%) 79 (21.2) 44 (4.6) 123 (9.3) 35 (24.5) 44 (8.3)
SRT report returned within study period, n (%) 215 (57.6) 435 (45.9) 650 (49.2) 92 (64.3) 317 (59.5)
Time from sample to report return (days), median (IQR, range) [n] 13 (9–15, 0–36) [215] 5 (3-11, 2-84) [430] 9 (4-14, 0-84) [645] 13 (9–17, 6–29) [92] 4 (3-6, 2-64) [312]
Sequencing results
SRT-suggestive patient acquired infection post-admission, n/N (%) 196/212 (92.5) 384/423 (90.8) 580/635 (91.3) 85/92 (92.4) 287/311 (92.3)
SRT-suggestive patient is part of ward outbreak, n/N (%) 151/212 (71.2) 260/423 (61.5) 411/635 (64.7) 65/92 (70.7) 202/311 (65.0)
Linkage identified not suspected at initial IPC investigation:
 All HOCIs in phase n/N (%, 95% CI) 24/348 (6.8, 1.7–11.8) 46/915 (6.7, 2.0–11.3) 70/1263 (5.5) 11/139 (7.9, 3.4–12.4) 39/512 (7.6, 5.3–9.9)
 When SRT returned n/N (%) 24/190 (12.6) 46/403 (11.4) 70/593 (11.8) 11/88 (12.5) 39/296 (13.2)
SRT excluded IPC-identified hospital outbreak, n/N (%) 14/213 (6.6) 27/428 (6.3) 41/641 (6.4) 9/92 (9.8) 25/310 (8.1)
Impact on IPC
SRT changed IPC practice:
 All HOCIs in phase n/N (%, 95% CI) 25/373 (7.4, 1.1–13.6) 74/941 (7.8, 2.4–13.2) 99/1314 (7.5) 1/143 (0.7, 0.0–2.1) 52/527 (9.9, 7.3–12.4)
 When SRT returned n/N (%) 25/215 (11.6) 74/429 (17.2) 99/644 (15.4) 1/92 (1.1) 52/311 (16.7)
SRT changed IPC practice for ward, n/N (%) 13/215 (6.0) 31/429 (7.2) 44/644 (6.8) 0/92 (0.0) 28/311 (9.0)
SRT used in IPC decisions beyond ward, n/N (%) 12/215 (5.6) 45/428 (10.5) 57/643 (8.9) 1/92 (1.1) 27/310 (8.7)
IPC team reported SRT to be useful, n/N (%)
 Yes 107/215 (49.8) 303/428 (70.8) 410/643 (63.8) 25/92 (27.2) 245/310 (79.0)
 No 67/215 (31.2) 71/428 (16.6) 138/643 (21.5) 50/92 (54.3) 57/310 (18.4)
 Unsure 41/215 (19.1) 54/428 (12.6) 95/643 (14.8) 17/92 (18.5) 8/310 (2.6)
HCW absence on ward
Proportion of HCWs on sick leave due to COVID-19, median (IQR, range) [n] 0.09 (0.00–0.15, 0.00–0.30) [49] 0.13 (0.07–0.29, 0.00–1.00) [162] 0.13 (0.04–0.27, 0.00–1.00) [321] 0.09 (0.00–0.15, 0.00–0.30) [49] 0.13 (0.08–0.29, 0.00–1.00) [143]

HCW, healthcare worker; HOCI, hospital-onset COVID-19 infection; IPC, infection prevention and control; IQR, interquartile range; SRT, sequence reporting tool.

*

As recorded by site, not based on recorded date or availability on central CLIMB server.

Estimated marginal value from mixed effects model, not raw %, evaluated on intention-to-treat basis with lack of SRT report classified as ‘no’.

Includes data for baseline phase: 0.13 (0.00–0.30, 0.00–0.88) [110].