Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 25;12:17884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22815-8

Table 3.

The ANOVA results and N content (%) under different treatments.

Year Cultivar Soil salt-ion concentration Early flowering stage Maturity stage
Root Stem Leaf Pre-anthesis deciduous leaf Root Stem Post-anthesis deciduous leaf Pod Seed
2019–2020 Yanyouza 3 LSSC 1.19 ± 0.02c 1.72 ± 0.03d 3.93 ± 0.07 cd 0.86 ± 0.02b 0.65 ± 0.03bc 0.64 ± 0.02c 0.96 ± 0.03 cd 0.74 ± 0.02c 3.69 ± 0.01d
HSSC 1.30 ± 0.01ab 1.90 ± 0.01b 4.13 ± 0.08a 0.93 ± 0.02a 0.78 ± 0.01a 0.85 ± 0.02a 1.10 ± 0.02ab 0.86 ± 0.02a 3.99 ± 0.08ab
Ningza 1818 LSSC 1.18 ± 0.01c 1.57 ± 0.03e 3.90 ± 0.07d 0.84 ± 0.02b 0.63 ± 0.01c 0.63 ± 0.02c 0.91 ± 0.02e 0.71 ± 0.03c 3.55 ± 0.08e
HSSC 1.30 ± 0.02b 1.8 ± 0.03c 4.06 ± 0.07abc 0.93 ± 0.02a 0.78 ± 0.01a 0.80 ± 0.01b 1.09 ± 0.02b 0.80 ± 0.02b 3.84 ± 0.06c
2020–2021 Yanyouza 3 LSSC 1.14 ± 0.01d 1.73 ± 0.01d 3.97 ± 0.13bcd 0.84 ± 0.02b 0.66 ± 0.02b 0.63 ± 0.01c 0.97 ± 0.02c 0.72 ± 0.02c 3.71 ± 0.05d
HSSC 1.30 ± 0.01ab 1.96 ± 0.03a 4.20 ± 0.08a 0.91 ± 0.02a 0.80 ± 0.01a 0.85 ± 0.01a 1.14 ± 0.01ab 0.87 ± 0.03a 4.00 ± 0.08a
Ningza 1818 LSSC 1.18 ± 0.03c 1.57 ± 0.03e 3.91 ± 0.07d 0.86 ± 0.02b 0.65 ± 0.01bc 0.62 ± 0.02c 0.94 ± 0.01de 0.70 ± 0.01c 3.53 ± 0.08e
HSSC 1.33 ± 0.02a 1.84 ± 0.05c 4.1 ± 0.04ab 0.93 ± 0.03a 0.78 ± 0.01a 0.81 ± 0.01b 1.12 ± 0.03ab 0.82 ± 0.02b 3.88 ± 0.06bc
ANOVA
Soil salt-ion concentration (SSC) ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
Cultivar (C) ns ** ns ns ns ** ** ** **
Year (Y) ns * ns ns ns ns ** ns ns
SSC*C ns * ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
SSC*Y * ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
C*Y * ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns
SSC*C*Y ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns

LSSC and HSSC represent low soil salt-ion concentration and high soil salt-ion concentration.

Probability levels are performed by ns, * and ** for not significant, 0.05 and 0.01. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at p = 0.05 between different treatments during two growing seasons. Data is mean ± SE (n = 3).