Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 13;14(6):1269–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.08.001

Table 2.

Individual Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of 20 Patients (9 Women and 11 Men) With NAFLD Analyzed in This Study

Patient Diagnosis Sex Age, y Weight, kg ALT level, IU/mL Fibrosis grade (Clinical Research Network) H&E (total NAS score) IF
IL22+ cells
Men (N = 11)
 LB051 NAFLD M 62 62 53 F2 6
 LB054 NASH M 41 124 249 F3 5
 LB059 NASH M 52 80 66 F0 1
 LB078 NASH M 57 93.2 195 F2 2
 LB084 NAFLD M 33 76 138 F1–F2 5
 LB099 NAFLD M 66 N/A 12 F1 2
 LB102 NASH M 38 101 65 F0 3
 LB123 NAFLD M 52 102 35 F3 5
 LB125 NAFLD M 43 140 196 F3 6
 LB130 NAFLD M 35 81 115 F2 6
 LB133 NAFLD M 61 109.4 16 F1 1
Women (N = 9)
 LB062 NASH F 59 100.4 58 F4 5
 LB076 NASH F 25 100 138 F1 6
 LB079 NAFLD F 52 55 23 F4 2
 LB093 NASH F 37 N/A 19 F2 6
 LB097 NASH F 62 89 204 F3–F4 3
 LB118 NASH F 40 120 45 F2 5
 LB119 NASH F 73 93 51 F4 6
 LB128 NASH F 51 63 94 F2 7
 LB131 NASH F 52 90.7 46 F3–F4 4