Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;4(5):e1777–e1787. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.07.003

Appendix Table 1.

Differences in Area Under ROC Curves (AUC) of Medial Tibiofemoral Distance Based on Ultrasonographic and Fluoroscopic Evaluation for Each Successive Injury State

Medial Tibiofemoral Distance at 20° of Knee Flexion Under Valgus Force AUC for Ultrasound 95% CI AUC for fluoroscopy 95% CI Difference in AUC P Value
Stage 0 vs stage 1 0.98 0.77-1.0 0.96 0.88-1.0 0.01 .737
Stage 1 vs stage 2 0.89 0.64-0.99 0.97 0.74-1.0 0.1 .207
Stage 2 vs stage 3 0.88 0.63-0.99 0.90 0.71-1.0 0.02 .829
Stage 3 vs stage 4 0.84 0.58-0.97 0.86 0.65-0.99 0.02 .848
Stable vs unstable injuries 0.97 0.82-1.00 0.98 0.83-1.0 0.01 .220

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; dMCL, deep medial collateral ligament; %, percentage; POL, posterior oblique ligament; sMCL, superficial medial collateral ligament; stable injuries, combined stage 0 and stage 1; stage 0, intact state; stage 1, transectioning of sMCL; stage 2, transectioning of sMCL and dMCL; stage 3 transectioning of sMCL, dMCL, and POL; stage 4, transectioning of sMCL, dMCL, POL, and ACL; unstable injuries, stage 2.