Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 12;13:964808. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.964808

Table 2.

Comparison of bone metabolism between patients with or without increased prolactin.

Variables All subjects Men Women
NP (n = 541) HP (n = 101) NP (n = 310) HP (n = 71) NP (n = 470) HP (n = 30)
Type I collagen, ng/ml 0.41 ± 0.23 0.37 ± 0.19 0.41 ± 0.24 0.40 ± 0.19 0.42 ± 0.23 0.30 ± 0.17
Osteocalcin, ng/ml 13.10 ± 5.37 12.00 ± 4.27 12.67 ± 5.63 12.14 ± 4.21 13.69 ± 4.95 11.59 ± 4.66
PTH, pg/ml 32.64 ± 19.90 29.92 ± 14.81 32.82 ± 20.68 30.48 ± 15.75 32.39 ± 18.85 28.36 ± 12.14
BALP, µ/l 118.73 ± 22.07 114.08 ± 19.35 117.73 ± 21.96 113.04 ± 19.53 120.09 ± 22.22 116.66 ± 19.17
Calcitonin, pg/ml 10.00 (5.25, 18.00) 12.50 (7.00, 19.75) 12.00 (6.00, 19.00) 14.00 (6.00, 20.00) 9.00 (4.00,17.00) 10.00 (7.00,19.50)
25(OH)VD, mmol/l 42.48 ± 16.57 46.22 ± 18.93 42.98 ± 16.32 45.90 ± 19.14 41.79 ± 16.93 47.04 ± 18.93
Total calcium, mmol/l 2.32 ± 0.10 2.30 ± 0.12 2.32 ± 0.09 2.27 ± 0.12 2.33 ± 0.11 2.36 ± 0.08

Continuous data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) or medians (interquartile ranges, IQR) based on the data distribution. Categorical variables are presented as number. NP, normal prolactin group; HP, increased prolactin group; PTH, parathyroid hormone; BALP, bone alkaline phosphatase; 25(OH)VD, 25-hydroxy vitamin D.