Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;12(20):2809. doi: 10.3390/ani12202809

Table 7.

Effect of gum Arabic (GA) on cecal microbiota of male broiler chickens on d 10 of age.

Parameters 1 GA Levels, % SEM 2 p-Value 3
0.00 0.12 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 GA L Q
Aerobic 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.5 11.5 11.6 0.25 0.970 0.770 0.790
Escherichia coli 7.9 b 8.2 b 7.7 b 8.4 b 8.5 b 8.6 a 0.20 0.010 0.060 0.440
Salmonella Typh. 8.9 a 9.0 a 7.9 b 8.0 b 7.9 b 8.0 b 0.27 0.009 0.020 0.110
Anaerobic 10.9 11.1 11.7 12.0 11.9 11.9 0.37 0.180 0.040 0.220
Clostridium perfringens 11.1 11.3 10.9 11.5 11.5 11.6 0.32 0.620 0.410 0.760
Lactobacillus spp. 9.9 c 10.5 b 11.0 a 11.1 a 11.3 a 11.1 a 0.19 0.001 0.001 0.001
Lactobacillus/Escherichia coli 1.3 b 1.3 b 1.5 a 1.3 b 1.3 b 1.3 b 0.03 0.030 0.050 0.010

a,b Means that do not share a common superscripted letter within a row for each parameter differ significantly from those of the basal diet (0.0%), as determined by the Dunnett test (p < 0.05). 1 colonies were counted using a colony counter and the results were expressed as log10 colony forming units per gram. 2 SEM = Standard error of means for diet effect. 3 GA = gum Arabic response; L = linear response; Q = quadratic response.