Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 26;22:276. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01750-2

Table 3.

Agreement and disagreement in systematic review findings from replicated Jadad assessments

Discordant Review Discordant Review authors’ or our Jadad assessments Review(s) chosen by the Discordant Review
(First author Year)
Cochrane or non-Cochrane SR Risk of bias in the review Type of effect estimate Pooled effect sizes and 95% CI Statistical significance (p-value of the effect estimate) Results favourable, null, or unfavourable Direction of effect
Bakdach 2020 Discordant Review authors Sardana 2018 Non-Cochrane Low Risk ratio 0.39 (0.26–0.59) 0.005 Favourable Disagree
Our Choice

Tasios 2019

(and Sardana 2019)

Non-Cochrane Low Risk ratio 0.46 (0.18-1.15) 0.1 Null
Chalmers 2015 Discordant Review authors Pulavarti 2007 Cochrane Low Risk ratio 0.89 (0.09, 8.72) 0.92 Null Agree
Our Choice

Lenters

(and Pulavarti 2007)

Non-Cochrane Low Risk ratio 1.31 (0.51, 3.34) 0.58 Null
Chen 2019 Discordant Review authors Shen 2017 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -17.39 (-22.32, -12.46) < 0.00001 Favourable Agree
Our Choice Dai et al. 2017 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -2.83 (-4.26, -1.39) 0.0001 Favourable
Fu 2019 Discordant Review authors Rabi et al. 2015 Non-Cochrane High Mean difference 1.63 (-2.84, 6.11) 0.47 Null Agree
Our Choice Handoll 2012 Cochrane Low Mean difference 2.36 (-3.52, 8.24) 0.43 Null
Guo 2018 Discordant Review authors Xia 2014 Non-Cochrane High Risk ratio 1.19 (1.05, 1.35) 0.006 Favourable Agree
Our Choice Hu 2011 Non-Cochrane Low Odds Ratio 3.34 (1.92, 5.81) < 0.0001 Favourable
Houck 2017 Discordant Review authors Riboh 2014 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference 14.70 (5.52, 23.87) 0.002 Favourable Agree
Our Choice Chan 2014 Non-Cochrane High Mean difference 1.05 (0.03, 2.06) 0.04 Favourable
Mascarenhas 2014 Discordant Review authors Millett 2014 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -3.7 (-8.8, 1.4) 0.16 Null Agree
Our Choice Sheibani-Rad 2013 Non-Cochrane High Mean difference 0.159 (-0.08, 0.40) 0.255 Null
Pekala 2019 Discordant Review authors Pabalan 2016 Non-Cochrane High Odds ratio 0.99 (0.75, 1.31) 0.95 Null Agree
Our Choice

Nong 2016

(and Pabalan 2016)

Non-Cochrane Low Odds ratio 1.13 (0.76–1.69) 0.55 Null
Song 2016 Discordant Review authors Cao 2015 Non-Cochrane High Risk ratio 0.41 (0.07, 2.52) 0.34 Null Agree
Discordant Review authors Wu 2015 Non-Cochrane Low Risk ratio 0.98 (0.2, 4.75) 0.98 Null
Our Choice Gurusamy 2013 Cochrane Low Odds ratio 0.49 (0.05, 4.72) 0.54 Null
Tan 2018 Discordant Review authors Feng 2015 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -0.18 (-0.36, -0.00) 0.04 Favourable Disagree
Our Choice Lin 2013 Non-Cochrane High Mean difference 0.05 (-0.49, 0.59) 0.87 Null
Xing 2016 Discordant Review authors Bellamy 2006 Cochrane High Mean difference -13.00 (-17.77, -8.33) < 0.00001 Favourable Agree
Our Choice

Richette 2015

(and Bellamy 2006)

Non-Cochrane High Standardised mean difference -0.21 (-0.32, -0.1) NR Favourable
Zhao 2015a Discordant Review authors Ouyang 2013 Non-Cochrane Low Risk ratio 1.20 (0.63, 2.28) 0.58 Null Agree
Our Choice Heineman 2010 Non-Cochrane Low Risk Ratio 0.71 (0.28, 1.76) 0.45 Null
Zhiyong 2019 Discordant Review authors Sun et al. 2016 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -0.12 (-0.33, 0.09) 0.28 Null Disagree
Our Choice Feng 2015 Non-Cochrane Low Mean difference -0.18 (-0.36, -0.00) 0.04 Favourable