Skip to main content
Antioxidants logoLink to Antioxidants
. 2022 Sep 27;11(10):1912. doi: 10.3390/antiox11101912

Health Benefits and Pharmacological Properties of Stigmasterol

Saad Bakrim 1, Nesrine Benkhaira 2, Ilhame Bourais 3, Taoufiq Benali 4, Learn-Han Lee 5,*, Nasreddine El Omari 6, Ryan A Sheikh 7, Khang Wen Goh 8, Long Chiau Ming 9,*, Abdelhakim Bouyahya 3,*
Editor: Cristiane Flora Villarreal
PMCID: PMC9598710  PMID: 36290632

Abstract

Stigmasterol is an unsaturated phytosterol belonging to the class of tetracyclic triterpenes. It is one of the most common plant sterols, found in a variety of natural sources, including vegetable fats or oils from many plants. Currently, stigmasterol has been examined via in vitro and in vivo assays and molecular docking for its various biological activities on different metabolic disorders. The findings indicate potent pharmacological effects such as anticancer, anti-osteoarthritis, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic, immunomodulatory, antiparasitic, antifungal, antibacterial, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties. Indeed, stigmasterol from plants and algae is a promising molecule in the development of drugs for cancer therapy by triggering intracellular signaling pathways in numerous cancers. It acts on the Akt/mTOR and JAK/STAT pathways in ovarian and gastric cancers. In addition, stigmasterol markedly disrupted angiogenesis in human cholangiocarcinoma by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) signaling down-regulation. The association of stigmasterol and sorafenib promoted caspase-3 activity and down-regulated levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 in breast cancer. Antioxidant activities ensuring lipid peroxidation and DNA damage lowering conferred to stigmasterol chemoprotective activities in skin cancer. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulation also contributes to the neuroprotective effects of stigmasterol, as well as dopamine depletion and acetylcholinesterase inhibition. The anti-inflammatory properties of phytosterols involve the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, the decrease in inflammatory mediator release, and the inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Stigmasterol exerts anti-diabetic effects by reducing fasting glucose, serum insulin levels, and oral glucose tolerance. Other findings showed the antiparasitic activities of this molecule against certain strains of parasites such as Trypanosoma congolense (in vivo) and on promastigotes and amastigotes of the Leishmania major (in vitro). Some stigmasterol-rich plants were able to inhibit Candida albicans, virusei, and tropicalis at low doses. Accordingly, this review outlines key insights into the pharmacological abilities of stigmasterol and the specific mechanisms of action underlying some of these effects. Additionally, further investigation regarding pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology is recommended.

Keywords: stigmasterol, pharmacological activities, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory

1. Introduction

The development of drugs against human pathologies dates back a long time, with the traditional use of natural resources such as medicinal plants. Indeed, with the advancement of molecular biology, anatomopathology and system biology, complex pathologies such as diabetes, cancer, and chronic inflammation are beginning to be deciphered [1]. Furthermore, the search for molecules with pharmacological properties against these pathologies has become increasingly molecular. Moreover, certain molecular mechanisms involved in these pathologies seem to be similar for the different pathologies, which makes the actions of the bioactive substances diverse and multiply; a single molecule can have several pharmacological effects when it acts on subcellular, cellular, and molecular targets involved in these pathologies [2,3,4]. Moreover, certain subcellular pharmacodynamic actions of the same molecule can have amplified and divergent therapeutic effects, which justifies the different pharmacological properties of certain bioactive molecules.

Stigmasterol (C29H48O, stigmasta-5,22-dien-3-ol), also known as wulzen anti-stiffness factor or stigmasterin, is a phytosterol, i.e., a steroid belonging to the class of tetracyclic triterpenes and having a structure similar to that of cholesterol (Figure 1). The human body cannot naturally produce this plant sterol; therefore, it is only available through foods and diets such as vegetable oils (rapeseed, soybean, and calabar bean oils), cereals, and other vegetables, unpasteurized milk, seeds, medicinal plants, as well as nuts and legumes which are common sources of phytosterols [5]. Stigmasterol is the main ingredient in several plant extracts, including the Chinese medicinal herb Ophiopogon japonicas (Maidong in Chinese) [6]. This natural agent was found to be the major ingredient isolated from the leaf extract of Annona muricata L. [7] and Aegle marmelos L. from India [8]. In addition, from the extracts of Plectranthus scutellarioides var. color blaze dark star from Indonesia, commonly called iler/miana/jawer kotok [9], we identified stem bark extracts of Albizia gummifera natively collected from sub-Saharan Africa and Madagascar [10], and Combretum hypopilinum from Nigeria [11], and extracts from Salvadora persica L. stems [12], as well as Acacia nilotica ssp. indica (L.) leaves from India [13] and Neocarya macrophylla stem bark extract from Nigeria [14]. Furthermore, stigmasterol is the main component isolated from the marine microalgae Navicula incerta [15], Fritillaria roylei root extracts (10), Ageratum conyzoides aerial part extracts [16], Neocarya macrophylla stem bark extracts [17], Cassia sieberiana leaf extracts [18], Pluchea indica root extracts from India [19], as well as from the leaf extracts of Icacina trichantha [20] and Azadirachta indica [21]. Other studies have shown high concentrations of stigmasterol in plant extracts, specifically [22] in carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) seeds from Turkey and Pakistani rice (Oryza sativa L.) [23].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural formulae of stigmasterol.

Stigmasterol is chemically named [(3S, 8S, 9S, 10R, 13R, 14S, 17R)-17-[(E, 2R, 5S)-5-ethyl-6-methylhept-3- en-2-yl]-10, 13-dimethyl-2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17-dodecahydro-1Hcyclopenta[a]phenanthren-3-ol] [24]. Regarding the purification and isolation of stigmasterol from plants, several approaches have been performed as spectroscopic techniques, including NMR and MS, on the stem-bark extract of Chrysophyllum albidum [25]. NMR (1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and LCMS) and mass spectroscopy (ESI–MS) were used to elucidate stigmasterol in Solanum xanthocarpum fruits [26].

The compound stigmasterol is employed in various chemical manufacturing processes intended to generate various semi-synthetic and synthetic components for the pharmaceutical industry [27]. Within the European Union, it is listed as a food additive under the number E499, which may be used to boost phytosterol levels in the production of foods, thereby helping to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol) levels [28]. This phytosterol is C24 alkylated cholesterol operating primarily as a common constituent of the cell membrane and playing a central role in membrane stability [13]. Increased interest is focused on essential oils, algae, and plant extracts as a source of promising bioactive compounds for drug development. There are currently around 250 plant sterols that differ in function and accessibility, but stigmasterol has become a unique compound due to its diverse pharmacological properties [29]. Indeed, this phytosterol has been widely studied for its anti-diabetic, antioxidant, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antiparasitic, anti-osteoarthritis, antibacterial, neuroprotective, and immunomodulatory properties.

Concerning the anti-diabetic effects of this phytosterol, previous research studies have shown that the administration of stigmasterol improves the glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) translocation and insulin resistance, reduces fasting glucose, and induced β-cell regeneration [30]. For its anticancer properties, recent findings on stigmasterol-rich plant extracts showed significant anticancer effects against various tumor cell lines by arresting cell cycle progression and inhibiting cell growth by regulating cell proliferation. In skin, lung, gastric, cervical, endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancers, stigmasterol acts via different mechanisms, and activities seem to be dose-dependent [20,31,32]. Furthermore, stigmasterol activated pro-apoptotic proteins, triggered PI3K/Akt, Akt/mTOR, and JAK/STAT, VEGFR-2 signaling pathways involved in numerous types of cancers and suppressed chemoresistance and enhanced inhibitory activity of some antiproliferative drugs [33,34,35,36,37,38]. Moreover, recent findings on stigmasterol-rich extract assessed antitumor cell proliferation through antiviral activities, particularly against HPV encountered in 30% of cervical cancer [7,39,40]. ADMET in silico properties revealed high permeability for human intestinal stigmasterol and the blood–brain barrier; moreover, high target protein binding stability (in vitro and in vivo) showed low toxicity of this phytosterol [38,40,41,42].

Like other phytosterols, stigmasterol also exhibits various anti-osteoarthritis properties [43]. Previous studies found that stigmasterol relieved cartilage degradation in rodent models of osteoarthritis [44]. When combined with mesenchymal stem cell secretome, stigmasterol reduces inflammation and leads to constant regeneration/repair of eroded cartilage [45,46]. This phytosterol could be considered in new therapeutic designs since it has anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties that can overcome osteoarthritis effects [47]. In fact, this bioactive sterol extracted from different natural sources plays an important anti-inflammatory and analgesic role [48]. The anti-inflammatory properties of stigmasterol were assessed in vivo, and the underlying mechanism of action was demonstrated by molecular docking analysis [49,50,51,52].

Stigmasterol-rich plant extracts exhibited effective anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities in vivo [53]. It was able to ensure the decrease in the release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), nitric oxide (NO), and pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as the inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [54,55]. Traditional Chinese medicine values stigmasterol-containing drugs in immune inflammatory response control, such as Smilacis Glabrae Rhixoma (SGR) for the management of myasthenia gravis [56] and xiaoqinglong (XQLD) against severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [57].

The studies carried out have highlighted the immunomodulatory activities of stigmasterol and extracts containing this compound. Indeed, stigmasterol has been shown to up-regulate the intestinal mucosal immune response involved in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by activating the butyrate-PPARγ axis in colitis [53]. It also stimulated (in vivo) specific and non-specific immune responses [26,49]. Additionally, plant extracts containing stigmasterol showed potent immunomodulatory activity in vitro. It was able to reduce the release of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, NO, IL-1β, and IL-6), as well as COX-2 activity [54].

Regarding the management of neurodegenerative diseases, previous studies have reported the great interest of stigmasterol from medicinal plants. The neuroprotective activities concerned, in particular, the GABAergic mechanism and the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase mitigating acetylcholine-mediated neurotransmission alteration [58,59].

The suppression of oxidative stress provided by stigmasterol induces both antitumoral and neuroprotective activities [8,60,61]. Recently, Haque et al. [62] found that stigmasterol attenuates excitotoxicity, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction as well as decreasing ROS production. Stigmasterol enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes (catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD)), and nitric oxide synthase enzymes (iNOS and nNOS), providing neuroprotective effects [63,64]. Other pathways involved in the protective effect of stigmasterol-rich extracts have been reported earlier [65,66].

Numerous works have shown the potential antimicrobial activities of stigmasterol. The latter exhibited bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against a broad range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [21,67,68]. Phytosterols are able to inhibit bacterial cell surface protein acts and induce bacterial membrane composition modification [69]. Previous studies, conducted on extracts containing stigmasterol, also revealed antifungal activities against specific Candida species [70,71] and other pathogenic fungal species [72].

Concerning the antiparasitic properties of stigmasterol, studies have been carried out to assess whether this molecule has activities against certain strains of parasites. Phytosterol treatment decreased the membrane binding of Trypanosoma congolense to sialic acid. However, in silico tests showed an uncompetitive inhibition of T. congolense sialidase [73]. In an in vitro investigation, the inhibitory effects of stigmasterol were also assessed on promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania major [74].

This review focused on a complete and up-to-date understanding of the health benefits and biological and pharmacological activities of the stigmasterol molecule, offering an extensive background to describe its mode of action (in vitro and in vivo). We are convinced that this review will provide new perspectives for further explorations of this deterrent molecule. The outcomes of this study should provide a new pharmacological approach for the use of stigmasterol as a key drug in the management of various illnesses, particularly in cancer therapy. However, toxicological studies are required to assess its safety; the analysis of such studies could also aid in the identification of many approaches for the successful development of new drugs. Moreover, a better knowledge of stigmasterol pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics is essential for its application in the therapeutic field and drug discovery.

2. Sources and Physicochemical Properties of Stigmasterol

Stigmasterol is a phytosterol found in many foods, including soybean, rapeseed, and Calabar bean oils. Furthermore, it has been isolated from some medicinal plants such as Ficus hirta, Croton sublyratus, Eclipta prostrate, Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk, Eucalyptus globules, Akebia quinata, Desmodium styracifolium, Gypsophila oldhamiana, Parkia speciosa, Emilia sonchifolia, Aralia cordata, and Heracleum rapula [75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].

Like all phytosterols, stigmasterol presents in the form of a white powder, with a characteristic sweet odor, and is insoluble in water but soluble in alcohols. Stevens and colleagues [83] used nuclear magnetic resonance to measure the solubility limit of some biologically important sterols including stigmasterol, lanosterol, β-sitosterol, cholesterol, and ergosterol. The results indicate the low solubility of stigmasterol (20–25% mol) compared with other sterols studied. Knowing that stigmasterol differ from cholesterol only by their alkyl tails, the low solubility shows that differences in the structure of the tail can strongly influence the solubility of sterols.

3. Anticancer Properties

Several types of investigations have revealed that stigmasterol exhibits significant anticancer properties against various tumor cell lines such as cholangiocarcinoma, hepatoma, endometrial adenocarcinoma, gallbladder carcinoma, as well as skin, gastric, cervical, breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers and can, consequently, be considered as one of the new perspectives in the pharmacological therapy of cancerous diseases (Table 1). Effectively, Bae et al. [87] evidenced that stigmasterol could be a promising molecule to prevent ovarian cancer. They showed that treatment with this phytosterol activates pro-apoptotic protein signals and stimulates the cleavage of caspase-3, caspase-9, cytochrome c, BAK, and BAX in ES2 and OV90 cells in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in the suppression of cell aggregation. In addition, stigmasterol was shown to induce cell apoptosis in ovarian cancer by leading to a significant alteration in mitochondrial function, increased calcium levels in the cytosol and mitochondria, as well as excessive ROS generation. Based on Western blot analysis, stigmasterol treatment (0, 5, 10, and 20 μg/mL) showed a significant ability to up-regulate the expression of endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondrial axis proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor proteins in ovarian cancer cells including phosphorylated eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α), inositol-requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α), activating transcription factor 6α (ATF6α), phosphorylated PKR-like ER-resident kinase (p-PERK), growth arrest and DNA damage-induced-153 (GADD153), glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), and phosphorylated eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α) stimulating cell death. Furthermore, stigmasterol arrested cell cycle progression and inhibited cell growth by regulating cell proliferation and inactivating intracellular signaling cascades, particularly the PI3K/MAPK pathway, but also decreased cell migration activity in human ovarian cancer cells [87] (Figure 2). Similarly, Li et al. [88] conducted a study using in vitro cell experiments to explore the protective effects of stigmasterol, as the main biological compound found in the Chinese herbal medicine Xiaoyao San, against ovarian cancer.

Table 1.

Anti-cancer effects of stigmasterol.

Cell Lines Key Results Ref
A2780 human ovarian cancer cell line
SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cell line
A2780 cells (IC50 = 69.24 ± 7.31 for 24 h)
SKOV3 cells (IC50 = 83.39 ± 3.75 for 24 h)
Inhibited cell migration in A2780/SKOV3 cells
Inhibited cell proliferation in A2780/SKOV3 cells
Down-regulated the expression of p-PI3K/p-Akt protein levels
Up-regulated the expression of PI3K/Akt/PTEN protein levels in SKOV3 cells
Reduced the levels of PI3K and Akt in A2780/SKOV3cells
Increased the expression of PTEN in A2780/SKOV3cells
[88]
Human gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901, MGC-803, and normal GES-1 cell line Inhibited cell proliferation in SGC-7901/MGC-803 cells
Induced apoptosis and autophagy in vitro
Blocked Akt/mTOR signaling pathway
Suppressed tumor growth of gastric cancer in vivo
[95]
Human ovarian cancer cells Inhibited development of ES2 and OV90 cells
Induced cell apoptosis
Suppressed cell migration
Inhibited angiogenesis genes
Increased ROS production
Increased calcium levels in the cytosol and mitochondria
Increased mitochondrial depolarization
Stimulated cell death
Activated the ER-mitochondrial axis
Inactivated PI3K and MAPK signal cascades
[87]
Human endometrial cancer cell lines, Ishikawa and SPEC2 Inhibited Nrf2/NQO1/HO1 expression in endometrial cancer cells
Suppressed Nrf2-ARE activity when combined with cisplatin
Enhanced early apoptosis when combined with cisplatin
Inhibited Tet1 expression/Tet1-induced hydroxymethylation
Enhanced the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on migration and invasion
[36]
Human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) and normal (HEK-293) cell lines IC50 = 24.5 μg/mL
Induced strong cytotoxic effects on MDA-MB-231 cells
Increased ROS production
Activated caspase-3 and -9
Induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells
Increased levels of p53, Bax, caspase-3 and -9
Declined Bcl-2 gene expression
Induced MDA-MB-231 cell death via apoptotic pathway
[34]
Molecular docking simulation
In silico ADMET approach
Molecular targets of breast cancer: ER-α, PR, HER2, and EGFR
Inhibited molecular targets of breast cancer: PR/ER-α/EGFR/HER2
Exhibited stronger binding affinities towards PR/ER-α/EGFR/HER2
Showed hydrophobic interaction with amino acid residue of PR/ER-α/EGFR/HER2
Identified as a substrate for P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4
Demonstrated high permeability for human intestinal absorption and Caco-2 cells
Showed high blood–brain barrier permeability
Showed no carcinogenicity
[42]
Human breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 Showed low cytotoxicity
Significantly reduced levels of p-ERK/NF-Kb/VEGF/VEGFR-2 (p ≤ 0.05)
Reduced Ki67 levels when combined with sorafenib (p ≤ 0.05)
Markedly decreased VEGFR-2 mRNA gene expression
Increased caspase-3 activity
Decreased Bcl2 levels
[38]
Human gastric cancer cell line SNU-1, GES-1 normal cell line IC50 = 15 µM
Inhibited gastric cancer growth
Inducted mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis
Inhibited cancer cell migration
Induced cell apoptosis
Triggered G2/M cell cycle arrest in a dose-dependent manner
Inhibited the JAK/STAT signalling pathway
Exhibited minimal anticancer effects on the normal GES-1 cells
Suppressed the phosphorylation of pSTAT1/pSTAT 2/pJAK1/pJAk2
[89]
Lung cancer cell lines Inhibited the proliferation
Promoted the apoptosis
Modulated retinoic acid-related orphan receptor C (RORC)
Increased levels of caspase-3 and caspase-9
[31]
Human hepatoma HepG2 cells Showed potent cytotoxicity against HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner
Up-regulated the levels of Bax, p53
Down-regulated the levels of Bcl-2
Induced apoptosis: caspase-8, 9
Increased apoptotic cell numbers
Induced morphological changes
Induced DNA damage
[32]
DMBA croton oil induced skin carcinoma Reduced tumor size and cumulative number of papillomas
Significantly increased the average latency period
Decreased the levels of ASAT/ALAT/ALP
Significantly increased glutathione (GSH)/superoxide dismutase (SOD)/catalase (CAT)
Significantly inhibited high levels of lipid peroxide and DNA damage
[20]
Human gall bladder cancer cells Up-regulated p27 expression gene
Down-regulated Jab1 expression gene
Activated caspase-3
Induced apoptosis
Increased apoptotic cells and DNA
[92]
Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma mice Decreased tumor volume
Decreased packed cell volume and viable cell count
Increased mean survival time
Increased life span of EAC tumor bearing mice
Decreased the levels of lipid peroxidation
Increased the levels of GSH/SOD/CAT
Increased LDH activity in ascitic fluid
Decreased membrane microviscosity
Activated protein phosphatase 2A by ceramide
Protected the heamoto-poietic system
Increased the hemoglobin content/RBC count
Reduced WBC count
Increased platelet count
[93]
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)
Human cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cells
IC50 = 21.1 ± 2.1 μM
Suppressed cell viability, migration, and morphogenesis on HUVECs, but not CCA cells
Significantly reduced the transcript level of TNF-α
Decreased levels of VEGFR-2/Src/Akt/PCL/FAK
Disrupted tumor angiogenesis (in vivo)
Reduced the growth of CCA cells (in vivo)
Decreased CD31-positive vessel content
Decreased macrophage recruitment
[41]
HeLa cervical cancer cells IC50 = 26.42 µM
Exhibited cytotoxic effects
Reduced cell viability
[35]
Human prostate cancer cells DU-145 Inhibited prostate cancer growth
Increased p53 protein expression
Inhibited carcinoma development
Decreased p21 and p27 protein expression
[94]
Molecular docking
In silico Approach (ADMET screening)
Human papillomavirus type (HPV-18 E1) protein (PDB ID: 1R9W)
MD simulations
Showed high binding affinity: docking score of −8.7 kJ/mol
Inhibited HPV-18 (1R9W protein)
Showed high stability inside the binding pocket of 1R9W
[40]
Cervical cancer cells (HeLa) and Vero cells (L-929)
In silico molecular docking
HeLa cells: IC50 = 11.58 µg/mL
Vero cells: IC50 = 173.8 µg/mL
Showed great in silico molecular docking activity
Exhibited in vitro anticancer activity
Exhibited potent cytotoxic activity at a concentration of 100 μg/mL
Strongly occupied the active location of 3F81
Exhibited substantial interaction energy values against the protein target vaccinia H1-related (VHR) phosphatise
Reduced the proliferation of cervical cancer cells (RCSB PDB ID: 3F81)
[7]

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Anticancer mechanisms of stigmasterol.

According to the molecular docking result, stigmasterol exhibits a high degree of interaction with Akt1. As evidenced by previous works, the dysregulation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway were identified in 70% of ovarian cancers, involving PIK3CA mutations and a PTEN deletion [37]. The results of this study indicated that stigmasterol could be a potential drug of interest for the management of ovarian cancer by triggering the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Based on the outcomes of wound healing assay and CCK8 assay, the action of stigmasterol could successfully suppress the growth and migration of A2780 (IC50 = 69.24 ± 7.31 for 24h) and SKOV3 (IC50 = 83.39 ± 3.75 for 24h) cells. Additionally, stigmasterol can decrease PI3K and Akt levels and increase PTEN expression in both cells studied [88].

Endometrial cancer is most commonly diagnosed in postmenopausal women and is the most frequent gynecological malignancy [33]. Nrf2 has been reported to be overexpressed in endometrial cancer tissues. In this context, Liao et al. [36] conducted a study to assess the possible chemopreventive effects of natural compounds such as stigmasterol and to elucidate its implication in inhibiting the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Based on IHC analysis, Nrf2 was identified to play a pivotal role in endometrial cancer progression and chemotherapy resistance, as Nrf2 was found to be more expressed in endometrial carcinoma tissue compared to normal endometrium and also resulted in decreased sensitivity to cisplatin. Indeed, stigmasterol increases the sensitization of endometrial cancer cells to cisplatin by suppressing Nrf2, NQO1, and HO1 expression in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, early apoptosis was found to be higher and endometrial cancer growth was inhibited when stigmasterol was combined with cisplatin. Additionally, stigmasterol reinforces the inhibitory activity of cisplatin on migration and invasion. In addition, the results showed that stigmasterol suppresses Tet1 expression and Tet1-induced hydroxymethylation, leading to suppression of Nrf2 protein expression. Therefore, the down-regulation of Nrf2 protein by stigmasterol is also mediated by the reduction in transcriptional activity [36]. These findings demonstrated that the combined treatment of stigmasterol with cisplatin could be used as a promising therapy to suppress chemoresistance in endometrial cancer via inhibition of Nrf2 pathway expression.

In order to show the anticancer properties of stigmasterol against gastric cancer, Li et al. [89] sought to investigate the effect of this compound against SNU-1 gastric cancer cells while evaluating its inhibitory power on the proliferation and colony formation of cancer cells. Undoubtedly, treatment with stigmasterol exhibited inhibitory effects on the proliferation, growth, and colony formation in SNU-1 gastric cancer cells (IC50 = 15 µM) as revealed by CCK-8 assay, concentration-dependent apoptotic cell death caused by mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis as observed by DAPI, and annexin V/PI staining assay confirmed by increased Bax expression and decreased Bcl-2, as evidenced by the Western blot assay. Stigmasterol has also been observed to suppress cancer cell migration and induce G2/M cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, this medicinal plant could suppress the expression of JAK-1, JAK-2, SATA-1, and STAT-2 and also could inhibit the phosphorylation of pJAK-1, pJAk-2, pSTAT-1, and pSTAT-2. Therefore, these findings indicated that stigmasterol targets inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling pathway, as shown by the in vitro experiment. In an effort to investigate the hypothesis that the Akt/mTOR pathway is a major molecular cascade triggered in a wide range of cancers, and its activation can lead to cancer progression [90]. In this sense, Zhao et al. [91] in their in vivo and in vitro investigations examined the anti-cancer effect of stigmasterol by inhibiting Akt/mTOR pathway in human gastric cancer cell lines SGC-7901 and MGC-803. The results indicated that stigmasterol treatment has a significant effect to inhibit the viability, cell growth, and proliferation of gastric cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner, as shown by CCK8 assay, cloning formation, and EdU incorporation assays. They also identified the underlying molecular mechanism of stigmasterol that induces autophagy and apoptosis by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway via down-regulated expression of both p-mTOR and p-Akt in cancer gastric cells in a concentration-dependent manner as determined by Western blot assay. Moreover, stigmasterol showed beneficial in vivo effects to inhibit tumor growth in MGC-803 and SGC-7901 cells [91]. These outcomes revealed that stigmasterol could be considered as a promising alternative for the treatment of gastric cancer.

Recently, Farshori et al. [34] assessed in vitro the anticancer potential of Aloe perryi petroleum ether extract (APPeE) and identified the probable mechanisms implied using human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) and normal (HEK-293) cell lines. The densitometric high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method has provided that stigmasterol was the main biomarker isolated from A. perryi extract, the quantification percentage was 0.238% w/w of dried APPeE. It is evident from the findings that this extract induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells. APPeE also caused an increase in ROS production and caspase-3 and -9 protein levels. In addition, data from this investigation demonstrated overexpression of the pro-apoptotic genes Bax, p53, caspase-3 and -9, and down-regulation of the Bcl-2 gene, as determined by Western blot assay further confirm that APPeE has the potency to induce MDA-MB-231 cell death via the apoptotic pathway. Furthermore, MDA-MB-231 cells treated with increased concentrations of APPeE induced morphological alterations, as evidenced by cell morphological assay. The predominant content of stigmasterol in APPeE could provide it with promising anti-cancer benefits in the future to treat breast cancer [34].

Furthermore, Omran et al. [38] performed a study to evaluate the possible anti-tumor effect of a combination of stigmasterol and sorafenib on angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis signaling implicated in promoting breast cancer progression using the MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 cell lines. A combination of sorafenib and stigmasterol down-regulated the proliferative marker Ki-67. Significant anti-angiogenic activity was also observed with both compounds independently. Levels of p-ERK and its downstream transcription factor, NF-κB, were both decreased. Both drugs also caused a reduction in the expression of the angiogenic mediator, VEGF-A, and its receptor, VEGFR-2. In addition, both stigmasterol and sorafenib promoted caspase-3 activity and down-regulated levels of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. The cytotoxicity of stigmasterol was low. Hence, the association of stigmasterol and sorafenib could prove beneficial in the treatment of breast cancer [38].

Using molecular docking simulation and an in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) approach, Spriha et al. [42] in their recent investigation aimed to identify some selected agents isolated from the multipotent plant Bergenia ciliate able to inhibit molecular targets involved in breast cancer, including PR (progesterone receptor), ER-α (estrogen receptor-α), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), and HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Among the fifteen components analyzed, the results obtained from the molecular docking showed that stigmasterol has stronger binding affinities −9.4, −9.4, −10, and −8.8 kcal/mol towards ER-α, PR, HER2, and EGFR, respectively. Additionally, stigmasterol extracted from Bergenia ciliata showed hydrophobic interaction with amino acid residues of ER-α (Leu346, Ala350, Leu354, Trp383, Leu384, Leu387, Leu525, Leu536, and Leu539), PR residues (Leu715A, Leu718A, Phe778A, Trp755A, Met759A, Phe794A, Leu797A, Met801A, Ile896A, and Cys891A), HER2 residues (Leu726, Val734, Ala751, Lys753, Leu800, Cys805, Leu852 and Phe1004), and EGFR residues (Leu718, Val726, Ala743, Lys745, Leu792, Met793, Cys797, and Leu844). In addition, in silico ADMET properties revealed that stigmasterol was identified as a substrate for P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4. It demonstrated high permeability for human intestinal absorption and Caco-2 cells, as well as high blood–brain barrier permeability, and showed no carcinogenicity [42]. Based on these data, stigmasterol showed significant properties to be an excellent compound in the search for new multi-targeted drugs to prevent breast cancer. On the other hand, using human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) cells, stigmasterol extracted from the marine microalgae Navicula incerta revealed potent anti-proliferative activity and toxicity against these cells in a dose-dependent manner. This compound has been shown to arrest the cell cycle and markedly stimulate the caspase cascade through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, thus leading to cell death. Indeed, the expression of Bax, p53, and caspase-8, 9 are up-regulated, but XIAP genes and Bcl-2 are down-regulated in a dose-dependent manner, as determined by Western blot assay. Furthermore, after 24 h of treatment at different concentrations (5, 10, and 20 μM), stigmasterol was found to induce morphological transformations, increase apoptotic cell numbers and lead to DNA damage in HepG2 cells, as demonstrated by annexin V staining and cell cycle analysis Hoechst staining. These data suggest that stigmasterol could be a potential candidate to protect against liver cancer [32].

Concerning skin cancer, 99% pure stigmasterol isolated from Azadirachta indica was tested to assess its possible chemopreventive potential against skin carcinogenesis induced by 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) and croton oil in mice. Ali et al. [20] revealed from their results that oral administration of stigmasterol (200 and 400 mg/kg three times/week for 16 weeks) markedly reduced tumor size and the cumulative number of papillomas, and increased the average latency period (13.10 ± 0.76). In order to examine oxidative stress and biochemical enzymes in treated mice, they found that stigmasterol decreases the levels of serum enzymes, including alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and bilirubin. Additionally, stigmasterol was able to increase the activity of glutathione (GSH), SOD and CAT, as well as suppress elevated levels of lipid peroxide and DNA damage. Furthermore, in stigmasterol-treated animals, histological examination showed evidence of tumor, acanthosis, and hyperkeratosis, but to a lesser degree than in control animals. These findings showed that stigmasterol exerts antigenotoxic potential due to its potency against oxidative stress and could be used as a bioactive compound to prevent skin cancer [20].

Concerning the exploration of the anti-tumor effect of stigmasterol against Jab1 in gallbladder cancer cells, Pandey et al. [92] in their investigation clearly showed that this compound induces gene modulations via the down-regulation of the Jab1 gene and the up-regulation of p27 expression that could be produced by the mitochondrial apoptosis signaling pathway. As evidenced by Hoechst staining, annexin V staining, and cell cycle analysis, stigmasterol was able to induce cell apoptosis and DNA damage, as well as activate caspase-3. Therefore, these outcomes provide compelling evidence suggesting that stigmasterol has the capability to be considered as an anti-cancer drug against Jab1 in gallbladder cancer [92].

On the other hand, the aim of the study performed by Ghosh et al. [93] was to investigate the anticancer effect of stigmasterol isolated from the aerial parts of Bacopa monnieri L. against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) in Swiss albino mice. Stigmasterol showed chemopreventive effects by decreasing tumor volume, packed cell volume, and viable cell number, as well as increasing mean survival time, thereby improving the lifespan of mice with EAC tumors. Regarding oxidative stress, stigmasterol treatment at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg to mice with EAC decreased lipid peroxidation levels by 49.0% and 56.1%, respectively, compared with the EAC control group (p < 0.01). Furthermore, this phytosterol caused an increase in GSH levels and SOD and CAT activities, demonstrating its ability to suppress carcinoma-mediated intracellular oxidative stress in mice. Hematological analysis indicated that stigmasterol exhibits protective activity on the hematopoietic system; it increased the levels of hemoglobin, platelets, and red blood cell count, but reduced the number of white blood cells with an increase in monocytes and lymphocytes and a decrease in neutrophils in treated mice compared with normal animals in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, stigmasterol also increased LDH activity in ascitic fluid and caused a decrease in membrane microviscosity. These findings showed that stigmasterol could be a promising drug for Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma [93].

Kangsamaksin et al. [41] have investigated (in vitro) the impacts of stigmasterol on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and its anti-tumor properties (in vivo) against human cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cells. The results demonstrated that stigmasterol exhibits potent toxic activity on HUVECs (IC50 = 21.1 ± 2.1 μM) by significantly inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, viability, morphogenesis, and capillary network formation. As shown by expression analyses, stigmasterol markedly disrupted (in vitro) angiogenesis by down-regulating TNF-α and inhibiting VEGFR-2 signaling levels, including phosphorylated forms of Akt, Src, PCL, Akt, and FAK in vitro, but showed no effect on IL-6 and CXCL-8. In the in vivo experiment, stigmasterol did not show signs of liver toxicity and showed no significant effect on levels of systemic and liver injury markers. However, stigmasterol significantly suppressed tumor growth, tumor angiogenesis, and macrophage recruitment in CCA xenograft models by inhibiting the production of inflammatory cytokines. These data proved the important role of stigmasterol in suppressing tumor growth and endothelial morphogenesis through the TNF-α-VEGFR-2 axis [41].

Moreover, the stigmasterol compound isolated from the stem bark of Aglaia simplicifolia was found to exert cytotoxic effects against HeLa cervical cancer cells with an IC50 of 26.42 µM. Nevertheless, ergosterol peroxide agents showed stronger activity in reducing the viability of Hela cells. The IC50 value was 0.80 µM, which may be due to its ability to induce mitochondrial alteration, apoptosis, and ROS production [35].

Intending to examine the chemopreventive effect of stigmasterol against lung cancer, Dong et al. [31] showed that stigmasterol exhibits an anticancer effect against lung cancer by promoting apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation by modulating retinoic acid-related orphan receptor C (RORC, a transcription factor that binds to DNA, is a family of receptors for nuclear orphans. It has aroused a lot of interest since it has an essential regulatory effect on cell proliferation, chemoresistance, and metastasis of different types of malignancies, identified as a potential target of stigmasterol on lung cancer. It was found that overexpression of RORC induces, to some extent, a reversal of the inhibitory activity of stigmasterol on lung cancer cells. Additionally, stigmasterol treatment (5, 10, and 20 µg/mL) resulted in a significant increase in caspase-3 and caspase-9 transcriptional levels compared to the control group [31].

In contrast, stigmasterol as a major component of Saw Palmetto berry extract (SPBE) was tested (in vitro) to show its antitumor activity against human prostate cancer cells DU-145. The results revealed that stigmasterol inhibits carcinoma development by decreasing p27 and p21 protein expression and also suppresses prostate cancer growth by increasing p53 protein expression as evidenced by Western blot analysis. This phytosterol may have positive effects on prostate cancer [94].

In order to find an alternative therapy for the management of cervical cancer, most often induced by human papillomavirus (HPV: representing approximately 30% of all cancers associated with an infectious microorganism) [39], Salaria et al. [40] examined the ability of natural bioactive compounds isolated from Himalayan herbs, including stigmasterol, to inhibit HPV-18 E1 protein (1R9W). As demonstrated by molecular docking, stigmasterol extracted from Berberis aristata showed high binding affinity with a docking score of -8.7 kJ/mol. Using ADMET screening, this natural drug was found to be one of the best phytoconstituents able to inhibit HPV-18 (1R9W protein). Additionally, stigmasterol showed high stability inside the binding pocket of the target protein 1R9W, as revealed by MD simulations data. Therefore, it can be used as a potential antiviral agent to prevent HPV [40].

From another study, stigmasterol isolated from Annona muricata leaves was found to exert significant cytotoxic activity on Vero and Hela cancer cells, showing a high selective index at different concentrations, IC50 values were 173.8 and 11.58 µg/mL, respectively. As revealed by molecular docking analysis, this substance also displayed substantial interaction energy values against the target protein, vaccinia virus H1 (VHRV)-related phosphatase, decreasing Hela cancer cell proliferation (RCSB PDB ID: 3F81) with a binding energy value of −6.6 (kcal/mol) and an inhibitory constant (Ki) of 14.34816 M. Accordingly, this isolated agent has the potential to be used to produce medicine to cure cervical cancer [7].

4. Anti-Osteoarthritis Effects

Osteoarthritis (OA) is nowadays one of the most widespread chronic joint diseases in the world; its incidence and prevalence increase with age, and it affects the majority of people over 65 years of age. It is one of the main musculoskeletal causes of reduced mobility in the elderly [43].

Previous research has shown that phytosterols exert a variety of biological actions, including anti-osteoarthritis properties (Table 2). In this sense, Chen et al. [44] assessed the in vivo activities of stigmasterol on cartilage degradation in a rabbit model of OA. The result showed that this compound was able to significantly inhibit cartilage degradation and the progression of cartilage alteration in a rabbit anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) model, as evidenced by histological and morphological examination. In addition, stigmasterol treatment resulted in markedly decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-1, MMP-3, MMP-13, and increased tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP-1). Indeed, it has been noticed that the expression of TIMP-1 decreases with cartilage degradation. Therefore, the equilibrium between MMPs and TIMPs was altered. Because the imbalance between MMPs and TIMPs was enhanced with progressive cartilage degradation, which reinforced the prominent role of TIMPs/MMPs in the OA process [44].

Table 2.

Anti-osteoarthritis effects of stigmasterol.

Experimental Approaches Key Results References
Experimental rabbit osteoarthritis (OA) model induced by anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) Reduced cartilage damage progression
Inhibited cartilage degradation
Down-regulated MMP-1/MMP-3/MMP-13 expression
Up-regulated TIMP-1
Regulated the balance between MMPs and TIMPs
[44]
Monosodium-iodoacetate (MIA)-induced rat model of OA Significantly corrected the OA lesions
Enhanced cartilage repair and regeneration
Provided a suitable milieu in situ
Aided in cartilage regeneration
Activated the resident progenitors
Enhanced tissue repair and healing
[45]
Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β)-induced inflammation in rat chondrocytes Reduced iNOS/IL-6/MMP-3/MMP-13/ADAMTS-5 expression
Increased COL2A1 expression
Inhibited IL-1β-induced NF-κB activation
[46]
A model of newborn mouse chondrocytes and human OA Inhibited pro-inflammatory/matrix degradation mediators
Decreased MMP-3/MMP-13/ADAMTS-4/PGE2
Reduced Type II collagen and aggrecan mRNA levels
Counteracted the IL-1β-induced NF-κB pathway
[96]
Interleukin (IL)-1β-induced chondrocytes Revealed no significant effect on the viability of ATDC5 cells
Reduced IL-1β-induced ATDC5 cell damage and ferroptosis
Enhanced the inhibitory effect of ferroptosis inhibitors
Down-regulated SREBF2
[47]
Molecular docking analysis
Network pharmacological approach and methods
Retarded the development of OA
Minimized the associated pathological damage
Involved in cell apoptosis/PI3K/AKT/IL-17 signaling pathways/viral infection
Reduced chondrocyte apoptosis
Protected the synovial lining and cartilage
Targeted IL-6/EGFR/MAPK8/CCND1/CASP3/ESR1/VEGFA/MYC
[97]
Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay LC50 = 87.7 µg/mL
Showed anti-arthritic activity by mTORC1 signalling pathway
Deactivated certain inflammatory mediators
Increased cell recovery and joint health
Reduced the inflammation caused in cartilages of synovial joint
Inhibited the formation of the IL and TNF-α pathways
[98]
Network Pharmacology Approach Thin-Layer Chromatography Analysis
Enrichment analysis
Exhibited potential pharmacological effect against OA
Involved Toll-like receptor (TLR)/IL-6 signaling pathways
[99]
Molecular docking analysis
Bioinformatics analysis
Exerted beneficial effects on cartilage degeneration
Targeted NCOA2/PGR/PTGS1/PTGS2/RXRA/NR3C2
Involved PI3K-Akt/TNF signaling pathways
[100]

In order to develop a novel therapeutic approach to alleviate OA, Sampath et al. [45] conducted an in vivo study to examine the effect of the combination of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and stigmasterol in a monosodium-iodoacetate (MIA)-induced experimental OA in rats. The results demonstrated that the combination treatment led to consistent regeneration/repair of eroded cartilage in the femoral condyles and also in the trochlear groove, highlighting the importance of combined treatment over individual therapies in rats with OA. Furthermore, the findings indicated that the combined intake of placental-derived MSCs (hPMSCs) and stigmasterol was the most potent in remedying OA damage, with simultaneous regeneration and repair, thus yielding precious insights into the in situ use of a combination of hPMSCs and stigmasterol to improve the repair and regeneration of cartilage in OA. Data from this study suggest that combination therapy will have a synergistic benefit on generalized cartilage damage in OA and lead to better disease management, but the mechanisms implicated remain unclear [45].

Similarly, Sampath et al. [46] attempted in their investigation to test in vitro the possible beneficial effects of stigmasterol with the MSC-condition medium (MSC-CM). The results showed a significant decrease in MMP-3, MMP-13, and ADAMTS-5, as well as a significant increase in the expression of collagen type II, alpha 1 (COL2A1) was found to mimic OA in vitro in primary rat articular chondrocytes, as evidenced by immunofluorescence and qRT-PCR. In fact, the combined therapy (MSC cm and stigmasterol) elicited a greater anticatabolic effect by suppressing IL-1β-induced NF-κB activation, as indicated by insignificant phosphorylation of p65 and IκBα subunits [46].

In order to study the impact of stigmasterol on metalloproteinases and inflammatory mediators produced by chondrocytes, Gabay et al. [96] used mouse and human chondrocytes incubated for 18 h with or without IL-1β. Therefore, they proved that stigmasterol effectively suppresses key pro-inflammatory (IL-6) and matrix degradation mediators including MMPs-3, MMPs-13, A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS)-4, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) involved in OA-induced cartilage degradation, mainly by suppressing the IL-1β-induced NF-κB pathway. Aggrecan and type II collagen mRNA levels were markedly diminished [96].

In the same context, Mo et al. [47] and colleagues sought to investigate the impact and mechanism of sterol regulatory element-related transcription factor 2 (SREBF2) on IL-1β-induced chondrocytes in the presence of stigmasterol. The results indicated that stigmasterol showed no significant activity on the viability of ATDC5 cells. It has the ability to attenuate IL-1β- and ferroptosis-induced ATDC5 cell injury mediated by SREBF2, and strengthened the inhibitory effect of ferroptosis inhibitors on IL-1β-induced ATDC5 cell injury. These findings suggested that stigmasterol alleviated IL-1β-induced chondrocyte injury through regulation of ferroptosis via SREBF2 down-regulation. This phytosterol could be promising as a new approach in the treatment of OA [47].

On the other hand, Zhang et al. [97] proved that stigmasterol was identified as a potential target in Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae (RAB) as evidenced by the network pharmacological approach and maybe the most important component in the treatment of RAB-mediated OA. RAS has been shown to delay the development of OA and minimize associated pathological damage. Moreover, the findings of the enrichment assay showed that the major pathways implicated in the therapeutic process are IL-17 signaling pathway, PI3K/AKT pathway, viral infection, and cell apoptosis. Moreover, active compounds in RAB, including stigmasterol, may have the potential to minimize chondrocyte apoptosis and also protect the synovial lining and joint cartilage to control OA progression.

It is essential to highlight that there are 63 target genes related to the treatment of OA by RAB, of which IL-6, EGFR, MAPK8, CCND1, CASP3, ESR1, VEGFA, and MYC represent the pivotal target genes [97].

Additionally, anti-arthritic activity and toxicity investigations in vitro and ex vivo by the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay have proven that stigmasterol exhibits a stronger response of anti-inflammatory dysfunction correlated to the arthritis disease activity. Furthermore, the CAM assay displays anti-arthritic activity via the mTORC1 signaling pathway and deactivates certain inflammatory mediators, which improves cellular healing and joint health. The LC50 toxicity value was 87.7 µg/mL. Moreover, CAM was found to be effective in decreasing the inflammation induced in synovial joint cartilages at an increased dose of 20 µg/mL. These data suggest that stigmasterol may be considered a potential beneficial agent in the management of OA [98]. In the same context, stigmasterol existing among various active components of Shenjin Huoxue Mixture (SHM) exhibited potential pharmacological effect against OA through the molecular mechanisms involving the Toll-like receptor (TLR) cascade pathway and an IL-6 signaling pathway [99].

Furthermore, stigmasterol was one of the main ingredients found in Xiao Huoluo Pills (XHLP), it has been revealed to exert beneficial effects on cartilage degeneration of knee OA, as demonstrated by molecular docking and bioinformatics analysis. This active biomolecule could be related to six targets, namely, NCOA2, PGR, PTGS1, PTGS2, RXRA, and NR3C2. These primary target genes are linked to signaling pathways involved in cartilage degeneration in knee OA, including the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway and the TNF-α signaling pathway [100].

5. Anti-Inflammatory Effects

Stigmasterol appears to play an important role in diminishing inflammation, which may be due to the presence of chemical compound precursors that can limit inflammatory processes. Table 3 summarizes investigations that have demonstrated the anti-inflammatory role of stigmasterol.

Table 3.

Anti-inflammatory effects of stigmasterol.

Experimental Approaches Key Results References
Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) induced inflammation in rats Significantly suppressed TNF-α/IL-6/IL-1β/Inos/COX-2 expression
Increased the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10
Down-regulated the expression of NF-kBp65/p38MAPK
Inhibited p-IKB-α activation
[101]
IL-1β-induced inflammation in rat chondrocytes Decreased the expression of iNOS and IL-6 [46]
Dimethylbenzene-induced ear edema test Inhibition = 50.34% at 30 mg/kg dose
Inhibited ear edema
Showed significant anti-inflammatory activity (p < 0.01)
[48]
Carrageenan-induced peritonitis and arachidonic acid-induced paw edema
Molecular docking
Acetic acid-induced writhing test
Decreased leukocyte infiltration in peritonitis assay
Reduced paw edema elicited by arachidonic acid
Prevented abdominal writhes and paw licking
Reduced the number of crossings
Presented anti-inflammatory effects mediated by glucocorticoid receptors
[51]
Dermatitis induced by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) Controlled inflammatory features such as ear skin oedema and neutrophilia
Inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines
Reduced serum levels of TNF-α
[49]
Induced rat paw oedema model Inhibition = 79.86 ± 0.16%
Inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory proteins
Exhibited the best binding energy (6.5 kcal/mol) against TNF-α
Observed to be an effective molecule against the COX-2 enzyme
Used as a topical anti-inflammatory drug
Enhanced electrophilic index
[52]
Ovalbumin induced allergic asthmatic mice Improved the number of inflammatory
Decreased the level of inflammatory modulator TNF-α and IgE antibodies
Reduced IL- 4, IL-5, and IL-13
Increased the expression levels of AQP1 and AQP5
[55]
LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells
LPS-induced acute lung injury in C57BL/6J mice
Activated the LXRs/ABCA1 signaling pathway
Affected the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway
[102]
Carrageenan-induced hind paw edema model Displayed anti-inflammatory effect (p < 0.001)
Decreased NO production
Inhibited TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and COX-2 production
[54].

In an effort to identify the molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory activity of stigmasterol in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) caused by increased generation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, Khan et al. [101] conducted a study using collagen-induced arthritis (CIA)-induced inflammation in rats. They have indicated that stigmasterol increases the development of severe clinical symptoms in CIA rats compared to the control group. The beneficial changes were related to a lowered level of joint destruction and enhanced histological damage. Additionally, stigmasterol therapy markedly inhibited the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators, including iNOS, IL-6, IL-1β, COX-2, and TNF-α, and up-regulated the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 via negative regulation of p38MAPK expression and NF-kBp65 (suppression of p-IKB-α activation) in the joints.

In their investigation, Sampath et al. [46] tested in vitro the possible anti-inflammatory effects of stigmasterol with MSC-condition medium (MSC-CM) to alleviate IL-1β-induced inflammation in rat chondrocytes. As evidenced by immunofluorescence analysis, a considerable decrease in iNOS and IL-6 expression was observed in rat chondrocytes from the treated group. Moreover, the combined therapy (MSC cm and stigmasterol) generated a greater anti-inflammatory activity by blocking IL-1β-induced NF-κB activation, as reflected by the insignificant phosphorylation of p65 and IκBα subunits [46].

The dimethylbenzene-induced ear edema test was used to assess the anti-inflammatory potency of stigmasterol. Stigmasterol was found to inhibit ear edema in mice in a dose-dependent manner, with a percentage inhibition of 50.34% at 30 mg/kg. This bioactive compound exhibited significant anti-inflammatory action, which was consistent with the evidence presented in the second (inflammatory) phase (p < 0.05) of the formalin test, suggesting that the analgesic action of stigmasterol might be in part induced by its anti-inflammatory effect [48].

Recently, Morgan et al. [51] aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory properties of stigmasterol in mice and its underlying mechanism of action using carrageenan-induced peritonitis and arachidonic acid-induced paw edema. Therefore, stigmasterol exhibited potent anti-inflammatory action, by decreasing arachidonic acid-induced paw edema and the leukocyte infiltration in the peritonitis test. As demonstrated by molecular docking analysis, this phytosterol could interact with glucocorticoid receptors and also RU-486 inhibited the effect of stigmasterol in the acetic acid abdominal torsion test, suggesting that the mechanism of action of stigmasterol is probably the involvement of glucocorticoid receptors [51].

From another investigation, the systematic administration of stigmasterol in rodents resulted in the suppression of the major local and systemic features of TPA-induced contact dermatitis by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Additionally, this natural sterol was able to lower the weight of the ears, whereas a measurement of the edema revealed a considerable suppression of the cutaneous inflammatory reactions. A notable outcome in this study was the down-regulation of serum TNF-α levels by stigmasterol [49].

On the other hand, in order to examine the possible anti-inflammatory properties of chemical compounds isolated from Petiveria alliacea, Olajubutu et al. [52] in their investigation indicated that stigmasterol was the main agent among other identified chemical compounds and reported that stigmasterol from the n-hexane fraction and ethanolic extract of P. alliacea inhibits the production of pro-inflammatory proteins. Interestingly, it exhibited the best binding energy (6.5 kcal/mol) against TNF-α. It has also proven to be an effective molecule against the COX-2 enzyme. The maximal percentage of inhibition of rat paw edema (79.86 ± 0.16%) was achieved at 5% within 4 h of treatment. Additionally, based on quantum chemical calculations, stigmasterol has been shown to be potentially beneficial for use as a topical anti-inflammatory drug, also possessing greater potential due to its enhanced electrophilic index.

Similarly, intraperitoneal administration of hexane (100 and 300 mg/kg) and hydroethanolic (100 mg/kg) fractions of ripe fruits of Solanum lycocarpum exerted strong anti-inflammatory activity and led to a significant suppression of carrageenan-induced paw edema in 4 and 6 h after induction of inflammatory signal. Stigmasterol was the main constituent detected from the fractions obtained and could be related to these activities [50].

Stigmasterol, as the main component of Critonia aromatisans hexanic extract, exhibited effective anti-inflammatory activity (in vivo). It was able to decrease macrophage release of TNF-α, NO, COX-2, and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6, without any alteration in macrophage viability [54].

Based on the results of the study conducted by Sharif et al. [55], stigmasterol, which might be one of the main chemical compounds of Aerva lanata ethyl acetate extract, improved remarkably (p < 0.001) the number of inflammatory cells in the blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. It has been reported that ethyl acetate extract of A. lanata decreases (p < 0.001) the level of inflammatory modulator TNF-α and IgE antibodies. A. lanata reduced (p < 0.001) IL- 4, IL-5, IL-13, and increased (p < 0.001) the expression levels of AQP1 and AQP5 in allergic asthmatic mice [55].

In a recent study, He et al. [102] investigated the anti-inflammatory properties of phytosterols using LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and LPS-induced acute lung injury in C57BL/6J mice. The results strongly indicated that phytosterols provide anti-inflammatory benefits by activating the LXRs/ABCA1 signaling pathway and altering the activation of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway [102]. Additionally, stigmasterol down-regulated the expression of inflammatory factors, including IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-treated mice [53].

6. Immunomodulatory Effects

According to the studies conducted, stigmasterol could be a pivotal agent due to its immunomodulatory effect (Table 4). In an effort to demonstrate the therapeutic potential of stigmasterol as an immunomodulatory agent in IBD, Wen et al. [53] have conducted a study using a DSS-induced colitis model to explore the possible role of stigmasterol against IBD and provide more detailed information on its mechanisms of action. It is essential to underline that the immune response of the intestinal mucosa has been reported to be associated with IBD, and that an imbalance between T helper 17 cells (Th17) and regulatory T cells (Treg) may be involved in the pathogenesis and progression of this intestinal disorder. In vivo experiments indicated that stigmasterol appreciably reduces DSS-induced inflammatory responses by regulating the Treg/Th17 balance. Indeed, stigmasterol significantly up-regulated the expression of IL-10 and TGF-β, but down-regulated the expression of IL-17A, as revealed by flow cytometry analysis. These results strongly suggest that stigmasterol both suppresses the Th17 cell response and promotes Treg-cell development in mice with DSS-induced colitis. Additionally, stigmasterol administration resulted in a higher generation of gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), specifically butyrate in the faeces of DSS-induced colitis mice. From a mechanistic standpoint, butyrate activated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and reprogrammed energy metabolism, thus promoting Treg differentiation and inhibiting Th17 differentiation, as evidenced by molecular docking. These findings indicate that PPARγ activation by butyrate restores Treg/Th17 cell balance, which could be a potential strategy by which stigmasterol alleviates IBD [53].

Table 4.

Immunomodulatory effects of stigmasterol.

Experimental Approaches Key Results References
Cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression in mice Exhibited effective immunomodulatory effect
Potentiated non-specific immune response
Increased haematological parameter
Increased neutrophil adhesion test
[26]
Ovalbumin-induced airway Decreased the proliferation of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes
Decreased the perivascular, peribronchiolar, and alveolar infiltration of inflammatory cells
Reduced the expression of VCAM-1/OVA sIgE levels
[103]
Dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis model Reduced DSS-induced inflammatory responses
Regulated the Treg/Th17 balance
Up-regulated IL-10 and TGF-β expression
Decreased the expression of IL-17A
Suppressed the Th17 cell response
Promoted the development of Treg cells
Provoked higher generation of gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), specifically butyrate
Activated PPARγ by butyrate restored Treg/Th17 cells balance
[53]
Carrageenan-induced hind paw edema model in NIH mice Reduced macrophage release of TNF-α/NO/COX-2/IL-1β/IL-6
Did not alter macrophage viability
[54]
Network pharmacology data Targeted PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, the TNF-α and IL-17 signaling pathway, and Th17 cell differentiation
Protected against myasthenia gravis
[56]
Biological network analysis Targeted STAT3, CCL2, MAPK1, FOS, VEGFA, CASP3, IL-6, MAPK3, MAPK8, and CASP8
Acted against COVID-19
Controlled immune, inflammatory response and apoptosis
[57]
Murine cells Suppressed Concanavalin A (ConA)-induced T-cell proliferation
Did not block T helper 2 (Th2) and cytokine (IL-4 and IL-10) secretion
Showed no effect on the secretion of Th1 cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ)
[104]

Khanam et al. [26] performed an in vivo study examining the possible immunomodulatory effects of stigmasterol from Solanum xanthocarpum fruit aqueous extract on cyclophosphamide-induced immunosuppression and the result revealed better protection by recording improvement in various hematological parameters and a neutrophil adhesion assay that stimulated the non-specific immune response [26]. IgE-mediated allergic reaction is described as a form of immunological process. Stigmasterol could exert an immunomodulatory effect on ovalbumin-induced airways. In fact, at 10–100 mg/kg, it caused a decrease in the proliferation of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and monocytes, as well as a decrease in the perivascular, peribronchiolar, and alveolar infiltration of inflammatory cells. In addition, stigmasterol exhibited inhibitory effects by significantly reducing VCAM-1 expression at 50 and 100 mg/kg as well as a significant decrease in serum levels of OVA-specific immunoglobulin E (OVA sIgE) [103].

In contrast, stigmasterol, as the main component of Critonia aromatisans leaf extracts, showed potent immunomodulatory activity in vitro. It was able to reduce the macrophage release of TNF-α, NO, COX-2, and the cytokines IL-1β and IL-6, without any alteration in macrophage viability [54].

Based on Chinese Medicine Network Pharmacology, Smilacis Glabrae Rhixoma (SGR) was used to explore its potential target and signaling pathway for the management of myasthenia gravis. Stigmasterol was found to be one of the main active components of SGR. As evidenced by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway assay, SGR could play a pivotal role in the treatment of myasthenia gravis and has immunomodulatory properties. The associated targets of SGR in the treatment of myasthenia gravis have been shown to focus primarily on the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, the TNF-α and IL-17 signaling pathways, and Th17 cell differentiation, which are conventional pathways for the pathogenesis and development of myasthenia gravis. These data reflect the multi-target and immune response of SGR in treating this disease and could provide further pharmacological activities [56].

Furthermore, phytosterols, including stigmasterol from xiaoqinglong decoction (XQLD) extract, have demonstrated immunomodulatory properties against COVID-19. As demonstrated by biological network analysis, stigmasterol might be a key ingredient of XQLD, whereas STAT3, CCL2, MAPK1, FOS, VEGFA, CASP3, IL-6, MAPK3, MAPK8, and CASP8 may represent potential drug targets. Molecular docking analysis results have revealed high affinity of the target proteins of the host cells with critical ingredients, including stigmasterol. Also, the enrichment assay indicated that XQLD may act against COVID-19 by controlling immune response, inflammatory response, viral defense, and apoptosis [57].

Stigmasterol, one of the bioactive compounds of Clinacanthus nutans, has an immunosuppressive effect on murine cells. Le et al. [104] found that stigmasterol potently suppressed Concanavalin A (ConA)-induced T-cell proliferation and did not block T helper 2 (Th2) and cytokine (IL-4 and IL-10) secretion compared to β-sitosterol. Stigmasterol showed no effect on the secretion of Th1 cytokines (IL-2 and IFN-γ). Thereby, these outcomes provide evidence that phytosterols isolated from C. nutans possess immunomodulatory properties with the potential to be used as a novel immunotherapeutic drug [104].

7. Neuroprotective Effects

Several research studies have shown that stigmasterol may be a promising bioactive molecule in the protection of neurological disorders (Table 5). As reported in previous investigations, gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors have been involved in neurological disorders. In this sense, Karim et al. [105] investigated the beneficial modulation of stigmasterol isolated from Artemisia indica against neurological diseases using in silico docking and other methods. Accordingly, stigmasterol increased GABA-induced currents at the ternary α2β2γ2L, α4β3δ, and binary α4β3 subtypes of GABAAR. α4β3δ was found to be notably higher than the binary α4β3 subtype, suggesting that the δ subunit is critical for effectiveness. Moreover, as demonstrated by computational analysis, this sterol exerted a stronger beneficial modulation on the extrasynaptic α4β3δ. In in vivo assays, stigmasterol at 0.5–3.0 mg/kg exhibited potent anticonvulsant and anxiolytic properties in a manner identical to allopregnanolone, thereby demonstrating the implication of a GABAergic mechanism. It seems clear that stigmasterol is considered a steroid drug of interest for the management of neurological diseases due to its ability to positively modulate GABA receptors [105].

Table 5.

Neuroprotective effects of stigmasterol.

Experimental Approaches Key Results References
In silico docking
Recombinant GABAA receptor subtypes expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes
Up-regulated GABA-induced currents at the ternary α2β2γ2L, α4β3δ, and binary α4β3 subtypes of GABAAR [105]
Human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y cells) Maintained ROS levels inside the cells
Prevented oxidative stress-induced cell death
Facilitated the up-regulation of FoxO3a/CAT/Bcl-2 in the neurons
Increased the expression levels of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1)
Decreased acetylated lysine levels
Stimulated SIRT1 activity
[61]
Glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal HT-22 cell line Exhibited neuroprotective activity
Inhibited ROS production
Inhibited Ca2+ production
[106]
Hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced excitotoxicity in hippocampal neurons Protected against excitotoxicity
Attenuated oxidative stress
Attenuated mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA damage
Controlled vesicle exocytosis
Reduced VGLUT1 expression and vesicle pool size
Suppressed GluN2B expression
Up-regulated mitophagy-related proteins: LC3BII/p62/PINK1
[62]
Ketamine-induced psychotic symptoms in mice Decreased locomotor activity
Reduced stereotypic behaviors
Decreased immobility duration
Increased step-down latency
Increased GABA and GSH levels
Decreased dopamine/MDA/TNF-α/AChE activity
Did not found to cause catalepsy
[59]
Hippocampal neuronal cell line (HT22)
In silico analysis
Reduced ROS production
Down-regulated cyclin D1/p53/p38/MAPK protein expressions
Inhibited cell apoptosis
Normalized cell cycle progression
Inhibited cytochrome P450 (CYP: CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1)
Revealed high binding to CYP1A1/CYP1A2
[60]
Vanadium-induced toxicity in mice Attenuated spatial learning deficits
Reduced escape latency
Reduced grooming and rearing
Reduced stretch-attend posture frequency
Increased activities of CAT/SOD
Decreased oxidative stress markers
Increased MBP expression
Crossed the blood-brain barrier
Exhibited potent antioxidant
Exhibited neuroprotective activities
[63]
Paraquat exposure-induced Parkinson’s disease-like symptoms and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster Decreased AChE activity and ROS generation
Prevented mortality and dopamine deficiency
Enhanced locomotor performance and lipid peroxidation
[58]
Induced Cerebral Ischemic/Reperfusion Injury in rats Reduced neurological deficits and infarct damage
Improved histopathology changes
Restored the levels of the endogenous antioxidant defense system
Depressed the expression level of beclin1, and the conversion of LC3 I to LC3 II
Promoted the phosphorylation of mTOR
Inhibited the phosphorylation of AMPK/JNK and expression of JNK
[95]
Structure-based molecular docking Showed higher selectivity for iNOS and nNOS
Exhibited similar binding conformations
Inhibited iNOS and nNOS without inhibiting eNOS
[64]
Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells Inhibition % = 13.74% at 50 μM
Did not exhibit neuroprotective potential in Aβ1–42-treated SH-SY5Y cells
[107]
Vanadium-induced neurotoxicity Decreased escape latency 28.01 ± 0.02
Increased swimming time in target quadrant 98.24 ± 17.38
Increased exploration and latency
Increased activities of antioxidant enzymes
Decreased oxidative stress markers and lipid peroxidation
Increased MBP expression
[108]
HT-22 mouse hippocampal cells Attenuated the neuron cell death
Protected against glutamate toxicity
[65]
- Reduced Aβ generation
Decreased β-secretase activity
Reduced expression of all γ-secretase components
Reduced cholesterol and presenilin distribution in lipid rafts
Decreased BACE1 internalization to endosomal compartments
[66]

Phytosterol is recognized for its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Using human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y cells), Pratiwi et al. [61] evaluated in vitro the positive effect of stigmasterol on cell death induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). There is a significant increase in ROS levels in cells induced by H2O2 exposure, leading to apoptosis. However, stigmasterol administration preserved ROS levels in cells and inhibited oxidative stress-induced cell death. It was observed that pre-incubation with stigmasterol also promotes the increase in CAT, forkhead box O (FoxO)3a and Bcl-2 in neurons. In a further development, sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) expression levels were also enhanced whereas acetylated lysine levels were reduced, suggesting that SIRT1 function was boosted by stigmasterol. These data stipulate that stigmasterol could conceivably be beneficial in attenuating oxidative stress-induced neurodegeneration [106].

Using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay, stigmasterol from Artemisia apiacea aqueous methanol extract has been shown to exhibit a neuroprotective activity against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in hippocampal HT-22 cell line through the suppression of calcium ion (Ca2+) and ROS generation [61].

On the other hand, Haque et al. [62] investigated whether this constituent might be able to prevent hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R)-induced excitotoxicity in hippocampal neurons. Consequently, neuronal culture preincubation with stigmasterol (20 μM) was able to provide neuroprotection against excitotoxicity, and alleviated ROS production, DNA damage, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Moreover, stigmasterol treatment also resulted in decreased expression of N-methyl-D-acetate receptor subunit 2B (GluN2B) and vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1) and decreased size of the recyclable synaptic vesicle (SV) pool. Similar to the ligand-binding domain of the liver X receptor β (LXRβ) agonist GW3695, stigmasterol abolished GluN2B expression. In addition, this phytosterol mediated mitophagy by increasing the expressions of p62, PINK1, and LC3BII. Furthermore, stigmasterol was found to interact with LXRβ via multiple hydrogen bonds, as evidenced by a molecular model study. These results suggest that stigmasterol may have therapeutic potential for ischemic stroke and associated neurological damage.

Animals treated with stigmasterol exhibited a statistically significant reduction in stereotypic behaviors, duration of immobility, locomotor activity, and an observed rise in descent latency. Biochemical assessments showed higher levels of GSH and GABA and lower levels of dopamine, TNF-α, MDA, and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. These results were supported by histopathological alterations in the cortical part of the brain. Furthermore, stigmasterol did not induce catalepsy or adverse effects on the reproductive tract. Thus, it has proven its ability to manage the symptoms of psychosis [59].

Stigmasterol is one of the main agents isolated from Momordica charantia. In fact, Pattarachotanant et al. [60] tested the neuroprotective properties of M. charantia and evaluated the molecular mechanisms involved in mouse hippocampal neuronal cell line (HT22). The results showed that M. charantia exerts neuroprotective activity by reducing ROS generation and decreasing the expression of MAPK proteins cyclin D1, p53, and p38, leading to the suppression of cell apoptosis and the normalization of cell cycle progression. Additionally, stigmasterol showed that its binding to CYP1A1 or CYP1A2 was found to be more effective. The results showed that this plant represents a promising neuroprotective effect, including stigmasterol as a probable active ingredient to avoid neurotoxicity induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) [60].

Adebiyi’s study [63] aimed to examine the protective activities of ethanol extracts of Grewia carpinifolia in vanadium-induced toxicity in mice while noting that β-sitosterol and stigmasterol were the important ingredients isolated from G. carpinifolia. The results showed that ethanol extracts of G. carpinifolia (200 mg/Kg) enhanced latent time on hanging wire line crossings and decreased rearing in the open field test. Additionally, this extract leads to lower levels of ALT and AST levels, upper levels of PCV, and protection against vanadium-induced disorganization of Purkinje cells in the cerebral cortex. Co-administration of β-sitosterol and stigmasterol markedly alleviated vanadium-induced spatial learning deficits compared with α-tocopherol by decreasing grooming, escape latency, craning, and frequency of stretch and wait for postures. Both compounds enhanced MBP expression and antioxidant enzymes activities such as CAT and SOD as well as decreased oxidative stress markers (MDA, NO, and H2O2). They also revealed stronger neuroprotective and antioxidant properties and crossed the blood–brain barrier. Consequently, they represent promising compounds for the management of vanadium toxicity [63].

Soares et al. [58] conducted a study to assess the beneficial neuroprotective activity of Bougainvillea glabra (Choisy) leaf extract against paraquat (PQ)-induced neurotoxicity. As demonstrated by HPLC and GC–MS methods, B. glabra extract showed the presence of several antioxidant compounds including stigmasterol. B. glabra extract administration resulted in decreased AChE activity and ROS generation, prevented mortality and dopamine deficiency as well as enhanced locomotor performance and lipid peroxidation. Parkinson’s disease being favored by oxidative stress and/or dopamine depletion. The results obtained by this study could suggest that B. glabra extract is an efficient drug in the prevention of neurological disturbances due to the synergistic antioxidant effects of compounds including stigmasterol [58].

On the other hand, Sun et al. [95] analyzed the neuroprotective effect of stigmasterol in an ischemia/reperfusion injury model. Indeed, this molecule was effective in significantly attenuating infarct damage and neurological defects mediated by ischemic/reperfusion injury, ameliorating histopathological alterations, and repairing endogenous antioxidant defense system levels in a dose-dependent manner. At the same time, it promoted mTOR phosphorylation and remarkably inhibited AMPK and JNK phosphorylation, as well as JNK expression and autophagic biomarkers including beclin1 and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) induced by 24 h of reperfusion [95].

In addition, stigmasterol and withanolide-M were identified from Withania somnifera screening by molecular docking analysis. Kumar et al. [64] have investigated their eventual neuroprotective properties and their dual inhibitor of inducible/neuronal nitric oxide synthase (iNOS/nNOS). The results reported that this combination showed greater selectivity for iNOS and nNOS compared to their selective inhibitors (AT2 and S19). Both compounds also bound to the catalytic heme domain of iNOS and nNOS with less binding energy (higher affinity). Both compounds exhibit similar binding conformations, as evidenced by AT2 and S19, and form a certain amount of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic contacts with nNOS and iNOS catalytic sites. Consequently, dual inhibition of iNOS and nNOS without inhibiting eNOS is a potentially beneficial neuroprotective strategy against stroke since nNOS and iNOS are detrimental in neurological disorders, whereas endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is beneficial [64].

Stigmasterol from Tarenna obtusifolia leaves showed no neuroprotective effect against amyloid-beta (Aβ1–42)-induced cytotoxicity in neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (13.74% at 50 μM) compared with vomifoliol (55.71% at 50 μM), which revealed neuroprotective activity as demonstrated by the ThT assay. Vomifoliol could therefore provide a novel therapeutic agent to prevent Alzheimer’s disease [107].

Adebiyi et al. [108] isolated bioactive drugs from Grewia carpinifolia, and subsequently examined their beneficial effects against vanadium-induced brain damage. The results indicated that stigmasterol, a bioactive ingredient in this plant, significantly promotes improvement in cognitive decline, motor coordination, and improvement in oxidative stress in vanadium-induced neurotoxicity. Stigmasterol significantly (p ≤ 0.05) decreased escape latency (28.01 ± 0.02 s) and increased target quadrant swimming time (98.24 ± 17.38 s), respectively, in sodium-metavanadate-induced memory loss in the Morris water maze. It significantly improved exploration and latency in the free field and hanging wire tests, respectively. In addition, the use of stigmasterol stimulated antioxidant enzyme activities, diminished markers of oxidative stress (CAT, SOD, H2O2) and lipid peroxidation (Malondialdehyde: MDA) in mouse hippocampal homogenates, and increased the expression of myelin basic protein (MBP) [108].

Brimson et al. [65] aimed to explore the protective effect of Rhinacanthus nasutus root ethanolic extract against glutamate and amyloid-β25–35 toxicity in cultured mouse clonal hippocampal cells (HT-22). Stigmasterol and other drugs were found to be the bioactive molecules of this extract. They exhibited high free radical scavenging abilities, as well as protected HT-22 cells against glutamate and amyloid-β toxicity. Hence, the synergetic action of various compounds, including stigmasterol, could have antidepressant effects [65].

Since the addition of Amyloid-β (Aβ), a key component of senile plaques in Alzheimer’s disease, stigmasterol has been found to significantly reduce Aβ production in vitro by reducing the expression of all γ-secretase components, by directly decreasing β-secretase activity, reducing cholesterol and presenilin distribution in lipid rafts. On the other hand, positive in vivo effects were reported in the prevention of Alzheimer’s disease when mice were fed a diet high in stigmasterol [66].

8. Antibacterial Activity of Stigmasterol

Many experiments promote stigmasterol as a potential antibacterial agent against a broad spectrum of pathogenic strains belonging to Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [21,67,68]. The stigmasterol compound, isolated from the stem bark of Neocarya macrophylla from Nigeria, exhibited a potent antibacterial effect described by Yusuf et al. [10] using the agar diffusion and broth micro-dilution methods, in which they recorded an important antibacterial effect of this molecule. At a concentration of 100 µg/mL, this compound was able to inhibit the growth of all organisms tested (Φ = 23–30 mm), namely S. aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas fluorescens, except vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Salmonella typhi, and Klebsiella pneumonia. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were low (6.25–25 µg/mL), concomitantly with the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) which ranges from 12.5 to 50 µg/mL, indicating that the compound has very good antibacterial activity against the pathogenic organisms [17]. In addition, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyrogenes, Bacillus subtilis, Corynebacterium ulcerans, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Shigellia dysenteriae were inhibited at modest concentrations of stigmasterol (50 µg/mL), derived from Spillanthes acmella, in which the MIC was 12.5 µg/mL with diameters of 20 ± 0.1 and 24 ±0.1 mm [71]. In another experiment, Abdissa et al. [109] showed that stigmasterol obtained from Caylusea abyssinica roots was able to repress Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC25903), Escherichia coli (ATCC25722), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DSMZ1117), and Salmonella thyphimurium (ATCC13311)) with inhibition diameters between 11 and 18 mm [110]. In another study, the antibacterial activity of this substance was evaluated on three pathogenic bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25922, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC10541, and Salmonella typhi ATCC6539. The researchers demonstrated that stigmasterol is effective against all strains tested with MIC values between 6.25 and 1000 µg/mL [109]. Moreover, Awouafack et al. [111] examined the bacteriostatic activity of stigmasterol extracted from the crude ethanol extract of Eriosema robustum twigs against four bacterial cultures and found that stigmasterol exhibits strong bacteriostatic activity on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (60 µg/mL), and a moderate action on Staphylococcus aureus (250 µg/mL), Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis (250 µg/mL). Interestingly, a study reported that steroids are able to inhibit bacterial cell surface protein, thus preventing transpeptidation [69]. More specifically, stigmasterol from the plant Phyllanthus columnaris has been shown to exhibit bacteriostatic properties against MRSA through a reduction in the translation processes leading to the inhibition of protein synthesis and prevention of bacterial growth [67].

9. Antifungal Activity

Various studies have reported that botanicals rich in stigmasterol possess antifungal properties [70,71]. An important antifungal impact was measured on two fungi strains; Candida albicans and Candida krusei where the stigmasterol inhibition zone diameters were 25 and 27 mm, and the MIC values were 12.5 and 25 µg/mL, respectively [17]. These outcomes were in line with other research, where they found that stigmasterol was able to inhibit Candida albicans and two other Candida species (C. virusei and C. tropicalis) with minimum inhibitory and fungicidal concentrations of 12.5 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL, respectively [71]. Conversely, other findings stated that this phytosterol extracted from the root bark of Zanthoxylum paracanthum does not inhibit the growth of C. albicans (MIC > 1000 μg/mL) [112]. In addition, it revealed a great inhibitory activity on three pathogenic fungal species, namely, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium digitatum, and Fusarium verticilloides with inhibition diameters ranging from 14 to 18 mm [72].

10. Antioxidant Activity

Stigmasterol has shown antioxidant properties in numerous investigations (in vivo and in vitro). One of the first researches on the antioxidant properties of stigmasterol was carried out by Hassanein et al. [113] on Vicia faba previously exposed to salt stress. Findings revealed that stigmasterol treatment (seeds pre-treated with 500 µM of stigmasterol) reduced oxidative damage by increasing the enzymatic antioxidant system (CAT and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)) and the non-enzymatic antioxidant system (GSH). Whereas, in control plants subjected to stressful conditions, the defense mechanisms were not sufficient to stabilize oxidative damage. Furthermore, Osuntokun et al. [114] showed that stigmasterol isolated from ethyl acetate stem bark extract of Spondias mombin acts synergistically with a phytosterol to reduce ROS production in diabetic rats and some oxidoreductase enzymes, including CAT, glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, which are considered an important cause of cellular oxidative stress. The same work revealed that stigmasterol can bind to redox sensor complex and Kelch-like ECH Associated Protein 1 (KEAP 1) that act as a key sensor of oxidative and electrophilic stress in Wistar rat liver cells, to reduce the oxidative stress of electrophiles endoplasmic reticulum stress from ROS. More interestingly, Liang et al. [95,115] studied the effect of stigmasterol on a reperfusion model of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats where the free radical production in brain tissue was increased. The outcomes of this work indicated that stigmasterol can noticeably prevent the decrease in SOD, CAT, and glutathione-peroxydase (GSH-Px) and the increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) in serum and brain tissue of model rats after cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in a dose-dependent manner (20–80 mg/kg) [95,115]. Moreover, some free radical scavenging assays have clearly revealed that the stigmasterol of Clerodendron inerme chloroform extract was able to inhibit the DPPH radical with an IC50 of 220 µg/mL. This compound also showed potent superoxide radical and hydroxyl radical scavenging activities with IC50 values of 210 and 150 µg/mL, respectively. While standard quercetin was more potent than stigmasterol, it exhibited IC50 values ranging from 110 to 135 µg/mL [116].

11. Anti-Diabetic Effects

Stigmasterol has also been found to exert anti-diabetic effects. Indeed, Wang et al. [117] showed that stigmasterol extracted from soybean oil can significantly improve GLUT4 translocation and glucose uptake in L6 cells, after supplementation of 50 and 100 mg/kg of this substance to diabetic KK-Ay mice for 4 weeks, indicating that the hyperglycemic phenotype of diabetic mice significantly improved after stigmasterol treatment. Moreover, the same experiment showed a notable hypoglycemic effect by the reduction in fasting blood glucose, serum insulin levels, and oral glucose tolerance in the treated groups. Another study reported that diabetic rats supplemented with 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg of stigmasterol for 21 days, showed a considerable decrease in fasting blood glucose levels associated with an increase in serum insulin [30]. Moreover, Ramu et al. [118] showed that stigmasterol reduced fasting blood glucose levels and moderated abnormalities in serum/urine protein, urea and creatinine, in an alloxan-induced diabetic rat model after treatment for 4 weeks with 100 and 200 mg/kg stigmasterol solution. Also, some diabetic symptoms such as polyphagia, polyuria, urinary glucose, and body weight loss were ameliorated in the diabetic rat group. Insulin and hemoglobin levels were also shown to be increased, whereas the HbA1c level was reduced. Furthermore, the altered activities of gluconeogenic enzymes (glucose-6-phosphatase, fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase) significantly returned to normal levels. Moreover, histological observations revealed marked regeneration of β-cells in drug-treated diabetic rats. Panda et al. [119] conducted their research to examine the effect of stigmasterol on diabetic female mice. Oral treatment with stigmasterol (2.6 mg/kg b.w.) for 20 days reduced serum glucose concentrations as well as hepatic glucose-6-phophatase (G-6-Pase) activity with a concomitant increase in insulin level. Another study showed that stigmasterol also increases total insulin and improves insulin secretion in cells exposed to glucolipotoxicity [120]. Recently, Reza et al. [121] reported the possible mechanism underlying the anti-diabetic properties of stigmasterol-rich Aeginetia indica. The molecular docking analyses revealed stigmasterol binding to sirtuin 4, an NAD-dependent deacylase enzyme that down-regulates leucine- and glutamate-dehydrogenase-induced insulin secretion.

12. Antiparasitic Activity

The structural features of stigmasterol appear to be crucial against some parasite strains. The in vivo effects of stigmasterol against Trypanosoma congolense in addition to its trypanosomal sialidase inhibitory effects were evaluated. Stigmasterol (200 mg/kg) has been found to significantly reduce parasitemia and improve T. congolense induced anemia as well as liver and kidney damage. Furthermore, the treatment with stigmasterol prevented the T. congolense-associated increase in free serum sialic acid with a corresponding decrease in membrane-bound sialic acid. Subsequently, in vitro enzyme kinetic studies revealed that stigmasterol is an uncompetitive inhibitor of a partially purified bloodstream T. congolense sialidase with an inhibition binding constant of 356.59 mM. Moreover, stigmasterol formed a single hydrogen bond interaction with a major residue (D63) at the catalytic domain of T. rangeli sialidase, showing that stigmasterol could retard the proliferation and the major pathological features of T. congolense infection [73]. Another study assessed the in vitro inhibitory effects of stigmasterol on promastigotes and amastigotes of Leishmania major (MHOM/IR/75/ER) using the MTT assay. Stigmasterol had efficient adverse effects on promastigotes and amastigotes of L. major with a fatality rate of 71.96% at 24 h post-culture in a concentration of 50 μg/mL [74].

13. Antiviral Activity of Stigmasterol

Stigmasterol has been shown to have antiviral properties. Indeed, Soekamto et al. [122] investigated the antiviral effect of this compound isolated from the stem bark extract of Melochia umbellate against dengue virus (DENV-2). The Dengue Antivirus Test revealed a potent inhibitory activity of this compound (IC50 = 9.11 μg/mL). Other studies explored the antiviral properties of stigmasterol derivatives. Specifically, Petrera et al. [123] tested two stigmasterol derivatives, (22S,23S)-22,23-dihydroxystigmast-4-en-3-one and (22S,23S)-3βbromo-5α,22,23-trihydroxystigmastan-6-one against herpes simplex virus type1 (HSV-1). Both compounds inhibited HSV-1 replication and spreading in human epithelial cells derived from ocular tissues. Another study examined the effect of 7-ketostigmasterol isolated from the green Antarctic alga Prasiola crispa on the replication of equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1). Data showed that stigmasterol inhibited EHV-1 in a dose-dependent manner. The inactivation percentages were 12.5 (51%), 25 (67%), 50 (91%), and 100 μM (100%). It could be deduced that 7-keto-stigmasterol probably interferes with EHV-1 attachment to cells with irreversible inactivation of virus infectivity [124].

14. Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability

It has been established that the level of phytosterols in natural foods is not very high, and phytosterols are not soluble in water. The solubility of phytosterols in dietary oil is only about 1% [125]. To deal with this issue, several researchers have attempted to identify alternatives to improve the bioavailability of phytosterols, including stigmasterol. Indeed, the esterification process was an efficient tool to increase the solubility of phytosterols in oil. This is the case of phytosterol oleate ester (PO), phytosterol acetic ester (PA) and phytosterol linoleic ester (PL), and other esters of phytosterol, which have been synthetically produced from phytosterol (PS) and have enhance the total content of phytosterol in food and the solubility in oil [126]. In humans, phytosterols (in esterified or non-esterified form) are principally transported in the blood by LDL, in contrast to rats, where HDL is the major transporter. Unabsorbed phytosterols are excreted mainly unchanged in the feces [127]. It is important to signal that phytosterol esters can be converted in the human body to phytosterols and fatty acids after digestion, and have unchanged biological functions. After entering the human body, phytosterol esters are emulsified by bile and hydrolyzed by lipase. Subsequently, phytosterol esters are absorbed into the bloodstream and transported to the tissues by intestinal absorption. They are then assimilated and utilized within the human body to perform their pharmacological and biological effects [128]. In this context, Wang et al. in their recent study aimed to investigate the bioavailability of synthesized phytosterol esters (stigmasterol as the main constituent) in vitro and in vivo using Caco-2 cell model and Wistar rats. The results showed that the bioavailability of phytosterol after esterification was better in vivo and in vitro, especially for the linoleic ester of phytosterol, which had a bioavailability of four times higher than that of free phytosterol [129]. Considering that phytosterols represent plant sterols structurally similar cholesterol, they can affect the bioaccessibility and bioavailability of cholesterol. Therefore, investigations into the distribution, metabolism, and excretion properties of phytosterols include quantifying the disponibility of cholesterol and comparing the bioavailability of phytosterols with that of cholesterol. In this sense [130], investigated the impact of increased bile salts and the addition of key lipid metabolism enzymes such as gastric lipase and cholesterol esterase on the bioaccessibility of sterols, including stigmasterol, in a plant-sterol-enriched beverage using an in vitro digestion scenario (INFOGEST). The results showed that the total bioaccessibility values of plant sterols obtained from the digestion of the plant sterol-enriched beverage with gastric lipase and cholesterol esterase (0.075 U/mL intestinal digesta) (8.0%) are closer to the absorption in humans (6%), as shown in the study by Kritchevsky and Chen [131]. In addition, the bioaccessibility values of stigmasterol obtained (5.5%) were similar to the absorption rates of stigmasterol (4.8%) reported in human studies [132]. In male rats with thoracic duct cannulation and cholesterol and phytosterol emulsions, only 0.5% of stigmasterol was recovered in the lymph, compared with cholesterol, campesterol, brassicasterol, sitosterol, and sitostanol, for which the percentages obtained were 59.2, 15.4, 3.3, 2.4, and 0.3%, respectively [133]. Overall, studies in both rats and humans indicate that the bioavailability of phytosterols and is influenced by the form of administration [127].

15. Toxicology and Clinical Investigations

The Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) observed that phytosterols are used as emerging new dietary components to lower high serum LDL cholesterol levels, which leads to already fairly high daily intakes of up to about 3 g/day. Furthermore, according to the panel, the estimated average intake of stigmasterol-rich plant sterols is 0.6–11.4 mg/day (0.01–0.2 mg/kg bw/day) for adults and 0.6–8.4 mg/day (0.01–0.1 mg/kg bw/day) for the elderly. The ranges of high-percentile (95%) intakes are 24–443.3 mg/day (0.4–7.4 mg/kg bw/day) for adults and 28.2–192.6 mg/day (0.5–3.2 mg/kg bw/day) for the elderly [134]. In a European investigation, Sioen et al. estimated regional intakes of plant sterol-enriched foods and supplements containing plant sterols that are commonly distributed in Belgium and reported a mean intake of 0.70 g/day for preschoolers and 1.51 g/day for adults. The 95th percentile intake for adults was considered to be 4.2 g/day, and 16.4% of the adult population had a plant sterol intake greater than 3 g/day [135].

With the aim to assess the toxicological effects of free phytostreols and their esters in vivo. In a subchronic toxicity study, Alpk:APfSD (Wistar-derived) rats (20/sex/group) were fed diets containing phytosterol esters at levels of 0, 0.16, 1.6, 3.2 and 8.1% (w/w) in the diet (equivalent to phytosterol concentrations of 0, 0.1, 1, 2 or 5%, respectively) for 90 days. The phytosterols used are derived from a variety of common edible vegetable oil distillates (mainly soya bean) and re-esterified with fatty acids from sunflower oil to increase their oil solubility. The phytosterol profile in the mixture was mainly β-sitosterol (48.7%), stigmasterol (21.6%), and campesterol (25.8%), with minor amounts of β-sitostanol (1.4%), brassicasterol (1.1%), unknowns (0.8%), and cholesterol (0.4%). The consumption of phytosterol esters, phytosterols, and stigmasterol were evaluated. During the study, there were no effects on mortality, nor clinical signs of toxicity, food consumption or utilization, body weights, or organ weights that were attributed to the consumption of phytosterol esters. From the content of stigmasterol in the phytosterol ester mixture (21.6%), the authors calculated a no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) expressed as stigmasterol equivalent to approximately 879 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose tested. Minor statistically significant changes were observed in some hematological and clinical chemistry parameters. The authors considered these changes to be of no toxicological significance [136].

Another study had the objective to investigate in vivo the potential subchronic toxicity of plant sterol esters following daily oral gavage administration to male and female Sprague Dawley rats (10 to 16/sex/group) at dose levels of 0, 1000, 3000, and 9000 mg phytosterol esters/kg bw/day for 90 days. The plant sterols were isolated from soybeans and subsequently esterified with unsaturated fatty acids (oleic acid ≥ 70%) from olive oil to increase their oil solubility. The plant sterol esters were composed of 49.4% β-sitosterol, 27.9% campesterol, and 18.5% stigmasterol as well as other agents. At the end of the experiment, the authors concluded that there were no adverse effects on mortality, clinical signs of toxicity, food and water consumption, ophthalmoscopy, urinalysis, haematology, serum biochemistry, necropsy findings, and organ weights in any treatment group. Due to the suppression of body weight gains in both sexes and the observed infiltration of mononuclear cells in the heart in males at a dose level of 9000 mg phytosterol esters/kg bw/day, the NOAEL for both sexes was considered to be 3000 mg phytosterol esters/kg bw/day [137].

Globally, many investigations report no important side effects of phytosterols on human including stigmasterol. Nevertheless, toxicity studies on stigmasterol-rich plant sterols still missing, and investigations of phytosterols and phytosterol esters to date have been limited to 90-day subchronic toxicity tests in rats, as evidenced in the data obtained in some studies [127,136].

16. Conclusions and Perspectives

Here, we reported biological effects and pharmacological properties of stigmasterol. This compound showed stochastic versatility of biological effects by exhibiting numerous health benefits. The involved mechanisms of stigmasterol are multiple actions including sub-cellular, cellular, and molecular targets. Indeed, this bioactive compound inhibited several human cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo via its different mechanisms, including apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and autophagy. However, anticancer effects of stigmasterol should be completed by other investigations, as well the determination of pharmacodynamic actions and pharmacokinetic ways. On the other hand, in vivo studies of stigmasterol in other pharmacological systems, such as anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic systems, should be carried to investigate more importantly the effect of this compound. In addition, clinical investigations should be also explored for further applications of stigmasterol in pharmaceutical applications. Moreover, toxicological explorations using in vivo models, as well as human patients, will be examined to validate the safety of this natural drug.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B. and T.B.; supervision, A.B.; methodology, K.W.G., L.C.M., A.B., T.B. and S.B.; software, I.B. and A.B.; validation, S.B., A.B., T.B. and L.-H.L.; formal analysis, A.B.; investigation, K.W.G., L.C.M., S.B., N.E.O., N.B., T.B., L.-H.L. and R.A.S.; data curation, N.B. and S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, N.B. and S.B.; T.B. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., N.E.O., L.-H.L., K.W.G. and L.C.M.; visualization, A.B., L.-H.L. and R.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

There was no conflict of interest between authors.

Funding Statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bassols A., Costa C., Eckersall P.D., Osada J., Sabria J., Tibau J. The Pig as an Animal Model for Human Pathologies: A Proteomics Perspective. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2014;8:715–731. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sharifi-Rad J., Ozleyen A., Tumer T.B., Adetunji C.O., El Omari N., Balahbib A., Taheri Y., Bouyahya A., Martorell M., Martins N. Natural Products and Synthetic Analogs as a Source of Antitumor Drugs. Biomolecules. 2019;9:679. doi: 10.3390/biom9110679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bouyahya A., El Omari N., Elmenyiy N., Guaouguaou F.-E., Balahbib A., Belmehdi O., Salhi N., Imtara H., Mrabti H.N., El-Shazly M. Moroccan Antidiabetic Medicinal Plants: Ethnobotanical Studies, Phytochemical Bioactive Compounds, Preclinical Investigations, Toxicological Validations and Clinical Evidences; Challenges, Guidance and Perspectives for Future Management of Diabetes Worldwide. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021;115:147–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bouyahya A., Mechchate H., Oumeslakht L., Zeouk I., Aboulaghras S., Balahbib A., Zengin G., Kamal M.A., Gallo M., Montesano D. The Role of Epigenetic Modifications in Human Cancers and the Use of Natural Compounds as Epidrugs: Mechanistic Pathways and Pharmacodynamic Actions. Biomolecules. 2022;12:367. doi: 10.3390/biom12030367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vanmierlo T., Bogie J.F., Mailleux J., Vanmol J., Lütjohann D., Mulder M., Hendriks J.J. Plant Sterols: Friend or Foe in CNS Disorders? Prog. Lipid Res. 2015;58:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen M.-H., Chen X.-J., Wang M., Lin L.-G., Wang Y.-T. Ophiopogon Japonicus—a Phytochemical, Ethnomedicinal and Pharmacological Review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016;181:193–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ahamed J.I., Francy K., Priya A.V., PremaKumari J., Steiny R.P., Kamalarajan P., Venkatadri B. Computational and Biological Efficacy of Stigmasterol against HeLa Cells and Vero Cells-First Time Isolated from the Ethanolic Extract of Annonamuricata Linn Leaves. J. Mol. Struct. 2022;1252:132186. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2021.132186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghosh S., Kumar A., Sachan N., Chandra P. Evaluation of the Antidepressant-like Effect of Total Sterols Fraction and Stigmasterol Isolated from Leaves of Aegle Marmelos and Possible Mechanism(s) of Action Involved. Curr. Drug Discov. Technol. 2022;19:26–40. doi: 10.2174/1570163818666210729165310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Astuti A.D., Yasir B., Rahim A., Natzir R., Subehan S., Goto K.N., Alam G. Isolation and Characterization of Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol from Plectranthus Scutellarioides Var. Color Blaze Dark Star and Cytotoxicity of Its Fraction. Egypt. J. Chem. 2022;65:1–2. doi: 10.21608/ejchem.2021.80171.3972. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ayele T.T., Gurmessa G.T., Abdissa Z., Kenasa G., Abdissa N. Oleanane and Stigmasterol-Type Triterpenoid Derivatives from the Stem Bark of Albizia Gummifera and Their Antibacterial Activities. J. Chem. 2022;2022:9003143. doi: 10.1155/2022/9003143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Muhammad A.A., Hassan H.S., Sani Y.M., Jimoh A.A., Bakare L.O., Sadam A.A. Isolation and Characterization of Lupeol and Stigmasterol from Methanol Root Extract of Combretum Hypopolinum (Diels.) Okafor (Combretaceae) J. Pharm. Allied Sci. 2021;18:3547–3553. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arora M., Kalia A.N. Isolation and Characterization of Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol-D-Glycoside from Ethanolic Extract of the Stems of Salvadora Persica Linn. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2013;5:245–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Padmasri G., Sarada D.V.L. Isolation and Characterization of Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol from Acacia nilotica (L.) Delile ssp. Indica (Benth.) Brenan. J. Pharm. Res. 2011;4:3601–3602. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yusuf A.J., Abdullahi M.I., Haruna A.K., Idris A.Y., Musa A.M. Isolation and Characterization of Stigmasterol and Bis-(5, 7-Diacetyl-Catechin-4’-α-Rhamnopyranoside) from the Stem Bark of Neocarya Macrophylla (Sabine) Prance (Chrysobalanaceae) Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015;23:15–22. doi: 10.4314/njbas.v23i1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaur K., Michael H., Arora S., Harkonen P.L., Kumar S. Studies on Correlation of Antimutagenic and Antiproliferative Activities of Juglans regia L. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2003;22:57–66. doi: 10.1615/JEnvPathToxOncol.v22.i1.60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kamboj A., Saluja A.K. Isolation of Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol from Petroleum Ether Extract of Aerial Parts of Ageratum Conyzoides (Asteraceae) Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2011;3:94–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mailafiya M.M., Yusuf A.J., Abdullahi M.I., Aleku G.A., Ibrahim I.A., Yahaya M., Abubakar H., Sanusi A., Adamu H.W., Alebiosu C.O. Antimicrobial Activity of Stigmasterol from the Stem Bark of Neocarya Macrophylla. J. Med. Plants Econ. Dev. 2018;2:1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Khan M.E., Odokpe A.U., Tor-Anyiin T.A. Isolation and Characterization of Stigmasterol and B-Sitosterol from Cassia Sieberiana (Fabaceae) Leaf Extract. J. Chem. Soc. Niger. 2020;45:135–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gomes A., Saha A., Chatterjee I., Chakravarty A.K. Viper and Cobra Venom Neutralization by β-Sitosterol and Stigmasterol Isolated from the Root Extract of Pluchea Indica Less.(Asteraceae) Phytomedicine. 2007;14:637–643. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2006.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ali H., Dixit S., Ali D., Alqahtani S.M., Alkahtani S., Alarifi S. Isolation and Evaluation of Anticancer Efficacy of Stigmasterol in a Mouse Model of DMBA-Induced Skin Carcinoma. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015;9:2793. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S83514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Alawode T.T., Lajide L., Olaleye M., Owolabi B. Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol: Antimicrobial Compounds in the Leaves of Icacina Trichantha Identified by GC–MS. Beni-Suef Univ. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2021;10:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s43088-021-00170-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fidan H., Stefanova G., Kostova I., Stankov S., Damyanova S., Stoyanova A., Zheljazkov V.D. Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Laurus nobilis L. Essential Oils from Bulgaria. Molecules. 2019;24:804. doi: 10.3390/molecules24040804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zubair M., Anwar F., Ashraf M., Uddin M.K. Characterization of High-Value Bioactives in Some Selected Varieties of Pakistani Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:4608–4622. doi: 10.3390/ijms13044608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaur N., Chaudhary J., Jain A., Kishore L. Stigmasterol: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2011;2:2259. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Idowu T.O., Ogundaini A.O., Adesanya S.A., Onawunmi G.O., Osungunna M.O., Obuotor E.M., Abegaz B.M. Isolation and Characterization of Chemical Constituents from Chrysophyllum Albidum g. Don-Holl. Stem-Bark Extracts and Their Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2016;13:182–189. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v13i5.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khanam S., Sultana R. Isolation of β-Sitosterol & Stigmasterol as Active Immunomodulatory Constituents from Fruits of Solanum Xanthocarpum (Solanaceae) IJPSR. 2012;3:1057–1060. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cabral C.E., Klein M.R.S.T. Phytosterols in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2017;109:475–482. doi: 10.5935/abc.20170158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Medina-Pastor P., Triacchini G. The 2018 European Union Report on Pesticide Residues in Food. EFSA J. 2020;18:e06057. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ashraf R., Bhatti H.N. A Centum of Valuable Plant Bioactives. Elsevier; Lahore, Pakistan: 2021. Stigmasterol; pp. 213–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nualkaew S., Padee P., Talubmook C. Hypoglycemic Activity in Diabetic Rats of Stigmasterol and Sitosterol-3-O--D-Glucopyranoside Isolated from Pseuderanthemum Palatiferum (Nees) Radlk. Leaf Extract. J. Med. Plants Res. 2015;9:629–635. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dong Y., Chen C., Zhang C., Zhang L., Zhang Y., Li Y., Dong Z. Stigmasterol Inhibits the Progression of Lung Cancer by Regulating Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor C. Histol. Histopathol. 2021;36:18388. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kim Y.-S., Li X.-F., Kang K.-H., Ryu B., Kim S.K. Stigmasterol Isolated from Marine Microalgae Navicula Incerta Induces Apoptosis in Human Hepatoma HepG2 Cells. BMB Rep. 2014;47:433. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2014.47.8.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Braun M.M., Overbeek-Wager E., Grumbo R.J. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am. Fam. Physician. 2016;93:468–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Farshori N.N., Al-Oqail M.M., Al-Sheddi E.S., Al-Massarani S.M., Alam P., Siddiqui M.A., Ahmad J., Al-Khedhairy A.A. HPTLC Estimation and Anticancer Potential of Aloe Perryi Petroleum Ether Extract (APPeE): A Mechanistic Study on Human Breast Cancer Cells (MDA-MB-231) J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2022;34:101968. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kurniasih N., Supriadin A., Harneti D., Abdulah R., Taib M.N.A.M., Supratman U. Ergosterol Peroxide and Stigmasterol from the Stembark of Aglaia Simplicifolia (Meliaceae) and Their Cytotoxic against HeLa Cervical Cancer Cell Lines. J. Kim. Val. 2021;7:46–51. doi: 10.15408/jkv.v7i1.20068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liao H., Zhu D., Bai M., Chen H., Yan S., Yu J., Zhu H., Zheng W., Fan G. Stigmasterol Sensitizes Endometrial Cancer Cells to Chemotherapy by Repressing Nrf2 Signal Pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01470-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mabuchi S., Kuroda H., Takahashi R., Sasano T. The PI3K/AKT/MTOR Pathway as a Therapeutic Target in Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015;137:173–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Omran G., Abd-Alhaseeb M., Houssen M. The Anti-Tumor Effect of Stigmasterol on Sorafenib Treated Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines. Res. Sq. 2021:1–14. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1021248/v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Araldi R.P., Sant’Ana T.A., Módolo D.G., De Melo T.C., Spadacci-Morena D.D., De Cassia Stocco R., Cerutti J.M., De Souza E.B. The Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Related Cancer Biology: An Overview. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;106:1537–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Salaria D., Rolta R., Mehta J., Awofisayo O., Fadare O.A., Kaur B., Kumar B., Da Costa R.A., Chandel S.R., Kaushik N. Phytoconstituents of Traditional Himalayan Herbs as Potential Inhibitors of Human Papillomavirus (HPV-18) for Cervical Cancer Treatment: An In Silico Approach. PLoS ONE. 2022;17:e0265420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kangsamaksin T., Chaithongyot S., Wootthichairangsan C., Hanchaina R., Tangshewinsirikul C., Svasti J. Lupeol and Stigmasterol Suppress Tumor Angiogenesis and Inhibit Cholangiocarcinoma Growth in Mice via Downregulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Spriha S.E., Rahman S.A. In Silico Evaluation of Selected Compounds from Bergenia Ciliata (Haw.) Sternb against Molecular Targets of Breast Cancer. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2022;56:S105–S114. doi: 10.5530/ijper.56.1s.49. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sacitharan P.K. Ageing and Osteoarthritis. Biochem. Cell Biol. Ageing Part II Clin. Sci. 2019;91:123–159. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3681-2_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chen W.-P., Yu C., Hu P.-F., Bao J.-P., Tang J.-L., Wu L.-D. Stigmasterol Blocks Cartilage Degradation in Rabbit Model of Osteoarthritis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2012;59:537–541. doi: 10.18388/abp.2012_2088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sampath S.J.P., Kotikalapudi N., Venkatesan V. A Novel Therapeutic Combination of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Stigmasterol to Attenuate Osteoarthritis in Rodent Model System—A Proof of Concept Study. Stem Cell Investig. 2021;8:5. doi: 10.21037/sci-2020-048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sampath S.J.P., Rath S.N., Kotikalapudi N., Venkatesan V. Beneficial Effects of Secretome Derived from Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Stigmasterol to Negate IL-1β-Induced Inflammation in-Vitro Using Rat Chondrocytes—OA Management. Inflammopharmacology. 2021;29:1701–1717. doi: 10.1007/s10787-021-00874-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mo Z., Xu P., Li H. Stigmasterol Alleviates Interleukin-1beta-Induced Chondrocyte Injury by down-Regulatingsterol Regulatory Element Binding Transcription Factor 2 to Regulateferroptosis. Bioengineered. 2021;12:9332–9340. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.2000742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kariuki D.K., Kanui T.I., Mbugua P.M., Githinji C.G. Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of 9-Hexacosene and Stigmasterol Isolated from Mondia Whytei. Phytopharmacology. 2012;2:212–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Antwi A.O., Obiri D.D., Osafo N., Essel L.B., Forkuo A.D., Atobiga C. Stigmasterol Alleviates Cutaneous Allergic Responses in Rodents. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:3984068. doi: 10.1155/2018/3984068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morais M.G., Saldanha A.A., Azevedo L.S., Mendes I.C., Rodrigues J.P.C., Amado P.A., De Souza Farias K., Zanuncio V.S.S., Cassemiro N.S., Da Silva D.B. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Fractions from Ripe Fruits of Solanum Lycocarpum St. Hil.(Solanaceae) and Putative Identification of Bioactive Compounds by GC–MS and LC-DAD-MS. Food Res. Int. 2022;156:111145. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Morgan L.V., Petry F., Scatolin M., De Oliveira P.V., Alves B.O., Zilli G.A.L., Volfe C.R.B., Oltramari A.R., De Oliveira D., Scapinello J. Investigation of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Stigmasterol in Mice: Insight into Its Mechanism of Action. Behav. Pharmacol. 2021;32:640–651. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Olajubutu O.G., Ogunremi B.I., Adewole A.H., Awotuya O.I., Fakola E.G., Anyim G., Faloye K.O. Topical Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Petiveria Alliacea, Chemical Profiling and Computational Investigation of Phytoconstituents Identified from Its Active Fraction. Chem. Afr. 2022;5:557–565. doi: 10.1007/s42250-022-00339-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wen S., He L., Zhong Z., Zhao R., Weng S., Mi H., Liu F. Stigmasterol Restores the Balance of Treg/Th17 Cells by Activating the Butyrate-PPARγ Axis in Colitis. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:4201. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.741934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ralf K., Gabriel B., Ermilo A.-A.V., Martha M.-G., Mirbella C.-F., Rocio B.-A. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of Critonia Aromatisans Leaves: Downregulation of pro-Inflammatory Cytokines. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016;190:174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sharif M., Anjum I., Shabbir A., Mushtaq M.N. Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Aerva Lanata in Ovalbumin Induced Allergic Asthmatic Mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022;289:115087. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Xiaoyue S., Yanbin L. Myasthenia Gravis: The Pharmacological Basis of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Its Clinical Application. BioFactors. 2022;48:228–238. doi: 10.1002/biof.1812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li H.-L., Zhou J.-P., Deng J.-M. Therapeutic Mechanism of Xiaoqinglong Decoction against COVID-19 Based on Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Technology. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2022 doi: 10.2174/1386207325666220228154231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Soares J.J., Rodrigues D.T., Gonçalves M.B., Lemos M.C., Gallarreta M.S., Bianchini M.C., Gayer M.C., Puntel R.L., Roehrs R., Denardin E.L. Paraquat Exposure-Induced Parkinson’s Disease-like Symptoms and Oxidative Stress in Drosophila Melanogaster: Neuroprotective Effect of Bougainvillea Glabra Choisy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;95:245–251. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yadav M., Parle M., Jindal D.K., Dhingra S. Protective Effects of Stigmasterol against Ketamine-Induced Psychotic Symptoms: Possible Behavioral, Biochemical and Histopathological Changes in Mice. Pharmacol. Rep. 2018;70:591–599. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pattarachotanant N., Prasansuklab A., Tencomnao T. Momordica charantia L. Extract Protects Hippocampal Neuronal Cells against PAHs-Induced Neurotoxicity: Possible Active Constituents Include Stigmasterol and Vitamin E. Nutrients. 2021;13:2368. doi: 10.3390/nu13072368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pratiwi R., Nantasenamat C., Ruankham W., Suwanjang W., Prachayasittikul V., Prachayasittikul S., Phopin K. Mechanisms and Neuroprotective Activities of Stigmasterol against Oxidative Stress-Induced Neuronal Cell Death via Sirtuin Family. Front. Nutr. 2021;8:648995. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.648995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Haque M.N., Hannan M.A., Dash R., Choi S.M., Moon I.S. The Potential LXRβ Agonist Stigmasterol Protects against Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury by Modulating Mitophagy in Primary Hippocampal Neurons. Phytomedicine. 2021;81:153415. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Adebiyi O.E., Olopade J.O., Olayemi F.O. Neuroprotective Effect of Grewia Carpinifolia Extract against Vanadium Induced Behavioural Impairment. Folia Vet. 2016;60:5–13. doi: 10.1515/fv-2016-0031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kumar G., Mukherjee S., Patnaik R. Identification of Withanolide-M and Stigmasterol as Potent Neuroprotectant and Dual Inhibitor of Inducible/Neuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase by Structure-Based Virtual Screening. J. Biol. Eng. Res. Rev. 2017;4:9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brimson J.M., Brimson S.J., Brimson C.A., Rakkhitawatthana V., Tencomnao T. Rhinacanthus Nasutus Extracts Prevent Glutamate and Amyloid-β Neurotoxicity in HT-22 Mouse Hippocampal Cells: Possible Active Compounds Include Lupeol, Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012;13:5074–5097. doi: 10.3390/ijms13045074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Burg V.K., Grimm H.S., Rothhaar T.L., Grösgen S., Hundsdörfer B., Haupenthal V.J., Zimmer V.C., Mett J., Weingärtner O., Laufs U. Plant Sterols the Better Cholesterol in Alzheimer’s Disease? A Mechanistical Study. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:16072–16087. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1506-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ibrahim N., Yaacob W.A. Transcriptome Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Response to Stigmasterol and Lupeol. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017;8:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Odiba J., Musa A., Hassan H., Yahay S., Okolo E. Antimicrobial Activity of Isolated Stigmast-5-En-3-β-Ol (β-Sitosterol) from Honeybee Propolis from North-Western, Nigeria. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2014;5:908–918. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kanokmedhakul K., Kanokmedhakul S., Phatchana R. Biological Activity of Anthraquinones and Triterpenoids from Prismatomeris Fragrans. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005;100:284–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Correa G., Abreu V.D.C., Martins D., Takahashi J.A., Fontoura H.D.S., Cara D.C., Pilo-Veloso D., Alcântara A.F.D.C. Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Activities of Steroids and Triterpenes Isolated from Aerial Parts of Justicia Acuminatissima (Acanthaceae) Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014;6:75–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yinusa I., George N.I., Shuaibu U.O.A., Ayo R.G. Bioactivity of Stigmasterol Isolated from the Aerial Part of Spillanthes Acmella (Murr) on Selected Microorganism. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014;3:475–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mbambo B., Odhav B., Mohanlall V. Antifungal Activity of Stigmasterol, Sitosterol and Ergosterol from Bulbine Natalensis Baker (Asphodelaceae) J. Med. Plants Res. 2012;6:5135–5141. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Aminu R., Umar I.A., Rahman M.A., Ibrahim M.A. Stigmasterol Retards the Proliferation and Pathological Features of Trypanosoma Congolense Infection in Rats and Inhibits Trypanosomal Sialidase in Vitro and in Silico. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;89:482–489. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.02.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Ranjbar R., Shayanfar P., Maniati M. In Vitro Antileishmanial Effects of Saffron Compounds, Crocin and Stigmasterol, on Iranian Strain of Leishmania Major (MHOM/IR/75/ER) Iran. J. Parasitol. 2021;16:151. doi: 10.18502/ijpa.v16i1.5535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.De-Eknamkul W., Potduang B. Biosynthesis of β-Sitosterol and Stigmasterol in Croton Sublyratus Proceeds via a Mixed Origin of Isoprene Units. Phytochemistry. 2003;62:389–398. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00555-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gao J.J., Cheng D.L., Liu X.P. Chemical Constituents of Emilia Sonchifolia L. DC. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi China J. Chin. Mater. Medica. 1993;18:102–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Han Y., Xia C., Cheng X., Xiang R., Liu H., Yan Q., Xu D. Preliminary Studies on Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Action of Eclipta prostrata L. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi China J. Chin. Mater. Medica. 1998;23:680–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jamaluddin F., Mohamed S., Lajis M.N. Hypoglycaemic Effect of Parkia Speciosa Seeds Due to the Synergistic Action of β-Sitosterol and Stigmasterol. Food Chem. 1994;49:339–345. doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(94)90002-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li C., Bu P.-B., Yue D.-K., Sun Y. Chemical Constituents from Roots of Ficus Hirta. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2006;31:131–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Li X.L., Wang H., Liu G., Zhang X.Q., Ye W.C., Zhao S.X. Study on Chemical Constituents from Desmodium Styracifolium. Zhong Yao Cai Zhongyaocai J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2007;30:802–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liu G., Zheng J., Yu Z., Zhang J., Lin R. Study on Sterols and Triterpenes from the Stems of Akebia Quinata. Zhong Yao Cai Zhongyaocai J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2005;28:1060–1062. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Peng T., Dong X., Deng Y., Tu Y., Li X. Research on Chemical Ingredients of the Root from Cultivar Aralia Cordata Thunb. Zhong Yao Cai Zhongyaocai J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2005;28:996–998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Stevens M.M., Honerkamp-Smith A.R., Keller S.L. Solubility Limits of Cholesterol, Lanosterol, Ergosterol, Stigmasterol, and β-Sitosterol in Electroformed Lipid Vesicles. Soft Matter. 2010;6:5882–5890. doi: 10.1039/c0sm00373e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Yang S., Zhong Y., Luo H., Ding X., Zuo C. Studies on Chemical Constituents of the Roots of Gypsophila Oldhamiana Miq. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 1999;24:680–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yang X.-W., Guo Q.-M. Studies on Chemical Constituents in Fruits of Eucalyptus Globulus. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi China J. Chin. Mater. Medica. 2007;32:496–500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zhang M., Chen Y. Chemical Constituents of Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 1996;21:480–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bae H., Song G., Lim W. Stigmasterol Causes Ovarian Cancer Cell Apoptosis by Inducing Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:488. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Li M., Zhang W., Yang L., Wang H., Wang Y., Huang K., Zhang W. The Mechanism of Xiaoyao San in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer by Network Pharmacology and the Effect of Stigmasterol on the PI3K/Akt Pathway. Dis. Markers. 2021;2021:4304507. doi: 10.1155/2021/4304507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 89.Li K., Yuan D., Yan R., Meng L., Zhang Y., Zhu K. Stigmasterol Exhibits Potent Antitumor Effects in Human Gastric Cancer Cells Mediated via Inhibition of Cell Migration, Cell Cycle Arrest, Mitochondrial Mediated Apoptosis and Inhibition of JAK/STAT Signalling Pathway. J. BUON. 2018;23:1420–1425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Alzahrani A.S. Proceedings of the Seminars in Cancer Biology. Volume 59. Elsevier; Alpharetta, GA, USA: 2019. PI3K/Akt/MTOR Inhibitors in Cancer: At the Bench and Bedside; pp. 125–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhao H., Zhang X., Wang M., Lin Y., Zhou S. Stigmasterol Simultaneously Induces Apoptosis and Protective Autophagy by Inhibiting Akt/MTOR Pathway in Gastric Cancer Cells. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:629008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.629008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Pandey P., Bajpai P., Siddiqui M.H., Sayyed U., Tiwari R., Shekh R., Mishra K., Kapoor V.K. Elucidation of the Chemopreventive Role of Stigmasterol against Jab1 in Gall Bladder Carcinoma. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets Former. Curr. Drug Targets Immune Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2019;19:826–837. doi: 10.2174/1871530319666190206124120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ghosh T., Maity T.K., Singh J. Evaluation of Antitumor Activity of Stigmasterol, a Constituent Isolated from Bacopa Monnieri Linn Aerial Parts against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in Mice. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2011;11:41–49. doi: 10.1007/s13596-011-0001-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Scholtysek C., Krukiewicz A.A., Sharma K.P., Sharma P.C., Goldmann W.H. Characterizing Components of the Saw Palmetto Berry Extract (SPBE) on Prostate Cancer Cell Growth and Traction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;379:795–798. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.11.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sun J., Li X., Liu J., Pan X., Zhao Q. Stigmasterol Exerts Neuro-Protective Effect against Ischemic/Reperfusion Injury through Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Inactivation of Autophagy. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019;15:2991. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S220224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gabay O., Sanchez C., Salvat C., Chevy F., Breton M., Nourissat G., Wolf C., Jacques C., Berenbaum F. Stigmasterol: A Phytosterol with Potential Anti-Osteoarthritic Properties. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010;18:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhang L., Shi X., Huang Z., Mao J., Mei W., Ding L., Zhang L., Xing R., Wang P. Network Pharmacology Approach to Uncover the Mechanism Governing the Effect of Radix Achyranthis Bidentatae on Osteoarthritis. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020;20:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-02909-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Gowri K., Chitra V. In-Vitro and Ex-Vivo Evaluation of Plant Sterol in Osteoarthritis by CAM Assay. J. Med. Pharm. Allied Sci. 1899;11:4288–4293. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yu M.-X., Ma X.-Q., Song X., Huang Y.-M., Jiang H.-T., Wang J., Yang W.-H. Validation of the Key Active Ingredients and Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Effects of Shenjin Huoxue Mixture against Osteoarthritis by Integrating Network Pharmacology Approach and Thin-Layer Chromatography Analysis. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020;14:1145. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S243951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Chen W., Lin T., He Q., Yang P., Zhang G., Huang F., Wang Z., Peng H., Li B., Liang D. Study on the Potential Active Components and Molecular Mechanism of Xiao Huoluo Pills in the Treatment of Cartilage Degeneration of Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Bioinformatics Analysis and Molecular Docking Technology. J. Orthop. Surg. 2021;16:1–19. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02552-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Khan M.A., Sarwar A.H.M.G., Rahat R., Ahmed R.S., Umar S. Stigmasterol Protects Rats from Collagen Induced Arthritis by Inhibiting Proinflammatory Cytokines. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020;85:106642. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.He D., Wang S., Fang G., Zhu Q., Wu J., Li J., Shi D., Lian X. LXRs/ABCA1 Activation Contribute to the Anti-Inflammatory Role of Phytosterols on LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury. J. Funct. Foods. 2022;89:104966. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2022.104966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Antwi A.O., Obiri D.D., Osafo N. Stigmasterol Modulates Allergic Airway Inflammation in Guinea Pig Model of Ovalbumin-Induced Asthma. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017;2017:2953930. doi: 10.1155/2017/2953930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Le C.-F., Kailaivasan T.H., Chow S.-C., Abdullah Z., Ling S.-K., Fang C.-M. Phytosterols Isolated from Clinacanthus Nutans Induce Immunosuppressive Activity in Murine Cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2017;44:203–210. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Karim N., Khan I., Abdelhalim A., Halim S.A., Khan A., Al-Harrasi A. Stigmasterol Can Be New Steroidal Drug for Neurological Disorders: Evidence of the GABAergic Mechanism via Receptor Modulation. Phytomedicine. 2021;90:153646. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lee J., Weon J.B., Ma C.J. Neuroprotective Activity of Phytosterols Isolated from Artemisia Apiacea. Korean J. Pharmacogn. 2014;45:214–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Tan M.A., Gonzalez S.J.B., Alejandro G.J.D., An S.S.A. Neuroprotective Effects of Vomifoliol, Isolated from Tarenna Obtusifolia Merr.(Rubiaceae), against Amyloid-Beta1-42-Treated Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells. 3 Biotech. 2020;10:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02421-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Adebiyi O.E., Olopade J.O., Olayemi F.O. Sodium Metavanadate Induced Cognitive Decline, Behavioral Impairments, Oxidative Stress and down Regulation of Myelin Basic Protein in Mice Hippocampus: Ameliorative Roles of β-Spinasterol, and Stigmasterol. Brain Behav. 2018;8:e01014. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tamokou J.D.D., Kuiate J.R., Tene M., Nwemeguela T.J.K., Tane P. The Antimicrobial Activities of Extract and Compounds Isolated from Brillantaisia Lamium. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2011;36:24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Edilu A., Adane L., Woyessa D. In Vitro Antibacterial Activities of Compounds Isolated from Roots of Caylusea Abyssinica. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2015;14:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0072-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Awouafack M.D., McGaw L.J., Gottfried S., Mbouangouere R., Tane P., Spiteller M., Eloff J.N. Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity of the Ethanol Extract, Fractions and Eight Compounds Isolated from Eriosema Robustum (Fabaceae) BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;13:289. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kaigongi M.M., Lukhoba C.W., Yaouba S., Makunga N.P., Githiomi J., Yenesew A. In Vitro Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activities of the Root Bark Extract and Isolated Chemical Constituents of Zanthoxylum Paracanthum Kokwaro (Rutaceae) Plants. 2020;9:920. doi: 10.3390/plants9070920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hassanein R.A., Hashem H.A., Khalil R.R. Stigmasterol Treatment Increases Salt Stress Tolerance of Faba Bean Plants by Enhancing Antioxidant Systems. Plant Omics. 2012;5:476–485. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Osuntokun O.T., Oluduro A.O., Idowu T.O., Omotuyi A.O. Assessment of Nephrotoxicity, Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidant Properties of Epigallocatechin, Epicatechin and Stigmasterol Phytosterol (Synergy) Derived from Ethyl Acetate Stem Bark Extract of Spondias Mombin on Wistar Rats Using Molecular Method of Ana. J. Mol. Microbiol. 2017;1:103. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Liang Q., Yang J., He J., Chen X., Zhang H., Jia M., Liu K., Jia C., Pan Y., Wei J. Stigmasterol Alleviates Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Attenuating Inflammation and Improving Antioxidant Defenses in Rats. Biosci. Rep. 2020;40:BSR20192133. doi: 10.1042/BSR20192133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Shanthakumar B., Sathish M., Suresh A.J. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of Extracts and Stigmasterol from Leaves of Clerodendrum Inerme Linn. Res. J. Pharm. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2013;4:1411–1418. [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Wang J., Huang M., Yang J., Ma X., Zheng S., Deng S., Huang Y., Yang X., Zhao P. Anti-Diabetic Activity of Stigmasterol from Soybean Oil by Targeting the GLUT4 Glucose Transporter. Food Nutr. Res. 2017;61:1364117. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1364117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ramu R., Shirahatti P.S., Nayakavadi S., Vadivelan R., Zameer F., Dhananjaya B.L., Prasad N. The Effect of a Plant Extract Enriched in Stigmasterol and β-Sitosterol on Glycaemic Status and Glucose Metabolism in Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Rats. Food Funct. 2016;7:3999–4011. doi: 10.1039/C6FO00343E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Panda S., Jafri M., Kar A., Meheta B.K. Thyroid Inhibitory, Antiperoxidative and Hypoglycemic Effects of Stigmasterol Isolated from Butea Monosperma. Fitoterapia. 2009;80:123–126. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2008.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ward M.G., Li G., Barbosa-Lorenzi V.C., Hao M. Stigmasterol Prevents Glucolipotoxicity Induced Defects in Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10209-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Reza M.S., Shuvo M.S.R., Hassan M.M., Basher M.A., Islam M.A., Naznin N.E., Jafrin S., Ahmed K.S., Hossain H., Daula A.F.M.S.U. Antidiabetic and Hepatoprotective Potential of Whole Plant Extract and Isolated Compounds of Aeginetia Indica. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;132:110942. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Soekamto N.H., Ahmad F., Appa F.E. Proceedings of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Volume 1341. IOP Publishing; Bristol, UK: 2019. Potential of Stigmasterol from EtOAc Extract Melochia Umbellata (Houtt) Stapf Var. Visenia as Dengue Antivirus; p. 32044. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Petrera E., Níttolo A.G., Alché L.E. Antiviral Action of Synthetic Stigmasterol Derivatives on Herpes Simplex Virus Replication in Nervous Cells in Vitro. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:947560. doi: 10.1155/2014/947560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dos Santos Souza Marinho R., Ramos C.J.B., Leite J.P.G., Teixeira V.L., De Palmer Paixão I.C.N., Belo C.A.D., Pereira A.B., Pinto A.M.V. Antiviral Activity of 7-Keto-Stigmasterol Obtained from Green Antarctic Algae Prasiola Crispa against Equine Herpesvirus 1. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017;29:555–562. doi: 10.1007/s10811-016-0946-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Fakih O., Sanver D., Kane D., Thorne J.L. Exploring the Biophysical Properties of Phytosterols in the Plasma Membrane for Novel Cancer Prevention Strategies. Biochimie. 2018;153:150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2018.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Hellner G., Hoke E.R., Nagy V., Szakács G., Poppe L. Integrated Enzymatic Production of Specific Structured Lipid and Phytosterol Ester Compositions. Process Biochem. 2010;45:1245–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.04.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Schneider K., DiNovi M., Baines J., Schlatter J. Phytosterols, Phytostanols and Their Esters. Saf. Eval. Certain Food Addit. 2009;117:3–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Moghadasian M.H., Tan Z., Le K., Shahidi F. Anti-Atherogenic Effects of Phytosteryl Oleates in Apo-E Deficient Mice. J. Funct. Foods. 2016;21:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.11.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Wang S., Yu D., Shi Y., Jiang L., Yang F., Yu G. Investigation into the Bioavailability of Synthesized Phytosterol Esters in Vitro and in Vivo Using Caco-2 Cell Model and Wistar Rats. Food Sci. Technol. 2021;42 doi: 10.1590/fst.68620. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Makran M., Faubel N., López-García G., Cilla A., Barberá R., Alegría A., Garcia-Llatas G. Sterol Bioaccessibility in a Plant Sterol-Enriched Beverage Using the INFOGEST Digestion Method: Influence of Gastric Lipase, Bile Salts and Cholesterol Esterase. Food Chem. 2022;382:132305. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kritchevsky D., Chen S.C. Phytosterols—Health Benefits and Potential Concerns: A Review. Nutr. Res. 2005;25:413–428. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2005.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Heinemann T., Axtmann G., Bergmann K. von Comparison of Intestinal Absorption of Cholesterol with Different Plant Sterols in Man. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 1993;23:827–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1993.tb00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hamada T., Goto H., Yamahira T., Sugawara T., Imaizumi K., Ikeda I. Solubility in and Affinity for the Bile Salt Micelle of Plant Sterols Are Important Determinants of Their Intestinal Absorption in Rats. Lipids. 2006;41:551–556. doi: 10.1007/s11745-006-5004-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.EFSA Panel on Food additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) Added to Scientific Opinion on the Safety of Stigmasterol-Rich Plant Sterols as Food Additive. EFSA J. 2012;10:2659. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sioen I., Matthys C., Huybrechts I., Van Camp J., De Henauw S. Consumption of Plant Sterols in Belgium: Consumption Patterns of Plant Sterol-Enriched Foods in Flanders, Belgium. Br. J. Nutr. 2011;105:911–918. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510004411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Hepburn P.A., Horner S.A., Smith M. Safety Evaluation of Phytosterol Esters. Part 2. Subchronic 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study on Phytosterol Esters–a Novel Functional Food. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1999;37:521–532. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(99)00030-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Kim J.-C., Kang B.-H., Shin C.-C., Kim Y.-B., Lee H.-S., Kim C.-Y., Han J., Kim K.-S., Chung D.-W., Chung M.-K. Subchronic Toxicity of Plant Sterol Esters Administered by Gavage to Sprague–Dawley Rats. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2002;40:1569–1580. doi: 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antioxidants are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES