Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Act Health. 2016 Oct 24;14(1):36–44. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0685

Table 3.

Odds Ratios (Walking Versus not Walking) by Domain, by Perception of Neighborhood Safety Attributes—Summer ConsumerStyles 2012

Safety attributes
Walking domain No sidewalk No crosswalk Speeding vehicles Poorly lit Crime Dogs
Walkers
 Odds ratio 1.08 (0.86, 1.37) 1.08 (0.78, 1.49) 1.22 (0.94, 1.59) 0.98 (0.72, 1.34) 0.83 (0.57, 1.23) 0.90 (0.66, 1.24)
 Adjusted odds ratio 1.15 (0.91, 1.46) 1.09 (0.79, 1.51) 1.31 (1.01, 1.70) 0.98 (0.71, 1.34) 0.83 (0.56, 1.21) 0.98 (0.70, 1.38)
Transportation walkers
 Odds ratio 0.91 (0.74, 1.12) 1.09 (0.82, 1.46) 1.22 (0.98, 1.52) 0.92 (0.70, 1.21) 1.22 (0.87, 1.72) 0.77 (0.58, 1.01)
 Adjusted odds ratio 0.96 (0.78, 1.19) 1.08 (0.81, 1.44) 1.29 (1.03, 1.62) 0.89 (0.67, 1.18) 1.16 (0.82, 1.64) 0.85 (0.63, 1.14)
Leisure walkers
 Odds ratio 1.13 (0.92, 1.39) 0.90 (0.67, 1.20) 1.05 (0.84, 1.31) 1.13 (0.86, 1.49) 0.95 (0.68, 1.34) 1.13 (0.85, 1.50)
 Adjusted odds ratio 1.17 (0.95, 1.44) 0.92 (0.69, 1.24) 1.10 (0.88, 1.38) 1.15 (0.87, 1.53) 0.97 (0.69, 1.35) 1.14 (0.85, 1.54)

Note. Figures in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Significant odds ratios in boldface. Adjusted models include sex, age-group, race, education level, MSA-status and region.

Abbreviations: MSA, Metropolitan Statistical Area.